User talk:Greatuser

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

Vidya Balan

The article looks good. Ask User:Dwaipayanc, Bollyjeff or IndianBio they are active in that area.--Tito Dutta (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan/archive2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan/archive2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 08:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A little explanation please

Hi Greatuser. I'm a little concerned about some of your recent edits and I was hoping you might be able to explain them to me. It concerns primarily User:Great User, an unregistered account on Wikipedia. Now I understand that you'd like to make sure that it redirects to your page as part of a doppelgänger account, however you'll need to actually create the account before redirecting (or find an account creator to do it for you).

What concerns me more though, is this move. User talk pages should not be moved to user pages, especially when they are then instantly redirected. I'm hoping you'll be able to explain why that happened.

Finally, a small quibble, would you mind removing the orange bar from your userpage? I know the text is different, but it is sufficiently similar that it falls afoul of simulating the wikipedia interface, which is against policy. Worm^TT(talk) 11:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the same thing but didn't bother to notify you. If you want the User page to redirect here, you should create the account, tag it as a doppelganger account, and then all is well. The current strategy is a bit of a policy violation. I also agree with the removal of the orange message bar. Vacation^nine 22:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

Regarding the FLC and the reason I closed it. This was primarily due to the fact that the previous nom had only been closed a few days earlier and the concerns raised there had not been addressed. Namely, the poor prose and formatting of the tables. You were encouraged to take the list to peer review, yet you did not. In its current state, the list is nowhere near featured standard. It requires an extensive copyedit of the prose by a native English speaker and the tables need to meet MOS:DTT. Please do this before you re nominate again. Also it is not good practice to revert my decision to close the FLC. Two other users raised concerns and for reasons outlined above I closed the discussion. As an FLC delegate I am allowed to do so. I understand you want to improve the. List and get it to feature standard, as we all do at FLC, but you to take our criticism on board. I look forward to seeing the list back at FLC after a peer review and copyedit. NapHit (talk) 13:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May i ask you (native English speaker) to have a look through the page, please clear error in the page and copyedit the page? Because i want to let the page be a FLC. Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 08:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently travelling round Australia, so I have limited time on here at the moment. Due to this, I won't be able to copyedit the list. I suggest putting it up for peer review, although you won't get a full copyedit, you'll get a lot of good suggestions on how to improve the article. Good luck! NapHit (talk) 12:04, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I hereby award you the Editor's Barnstar for your contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan. 182.183.130.172 (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammad Nazim

The article Mohammad Nazim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 22:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor Barnstar
	I am awarding you this barnstar for your ~~copyediting~~ Contributions in Bade Achhe Lagte Hain. Great Ali Hussain (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ali Mohammad Khilji (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greatuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I even don't know [[::User:Ali Mohammad Khilji|Ali Mohammad Khilji]] ([[::User talk:Ali Mohammad Khilji|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Ali Mohammad Khilji|contribs]]) so how could i be a sock of the user, Please ask a checkuser to check back it may be a mistake. and once see my and Ali's contributions, they are simply different from each other, (s)he works on Pakistani related articles while i work on Indian related articles. please ask a Checkuser to investigate back it might be a mistake. Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 10:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The discussion is located here, and CU confirms that you are a sock. Bjelleklang - talk 11:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AN report

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammad Nazim

The article Mohammad Nazim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 23:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zakhmi Zameen 1990 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Zakhmi Zameen 1990 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greatuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Note: This is not an unblock request but I have included this template to attract sysops towards my talk page. (When you (admin) reply it please don't replace this with {{unblock reviewed}})

Is there any solution of this sockpuppetry case, I don't know how i became a sock of Muhammad Ali Khinjil when i even don't know him/her, Anyways i want the solution of this sockpuppetry case, Can i get unblocked? Because i am a great lover of Wikipedia editingGreatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 04:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is confusing. You state it's not an unblock request, then you request an unblock in the next sentence. Max Semenik (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not requesting to be unblocked but i'm asking solution of being unblocked, if any body have the solution please post it here Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 11:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to attract an administrator's attention without requesting an unblock, then put {{adminhelp}} on this page, followed by a statement of what help you want. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

.

I am looking for the solution of this sock case, if there is please reply me, i don't know how checkuser has identified me a sockpuppet. Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 09:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Try WP:BASC. Max Semenik (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, try BASC, but please consider not wasting the community's time. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Nazim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Nazim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Nazim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Forgot to put name 17:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MRS.-KAUSHIK-KI-PAANCH-BAHUEIN.png)

Thanks for uploading File:MRS.-KAUSHIK-KI-PAANCH-BAHUEIN.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help! plz

Administrator help needed

Ask your question below.
If the issue requires immediate attention or input from many administrators, please go to the administrators' noticeboard for incidents instead.
If you want to edit a fully protected page, please use the edit request wizard or {{edit fully-protected}} instead. If you want an administrator to move a page, please go to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. If the page needs repair from cut-and-paste moves, please go to Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
If other users can help, please use the template {{help me}} instead.
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC is notified when this template is used. Alternatively, you can join the IRC channel directly.

When help has been offered, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

The above one did not help me at all, ok now leave it i know i will not be unblocked, but now if i create another account, will i be blocked again as a sock or not blocked? Greatuser _(t@lk)^{My edits} 19:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]