User talk:Cabe6403

edit count | edit summary usage Cabe6403 Home | Talk | Contributions | Gallery | To do | Sign! | Email me Please click here to leave me a message My YouTube Channel A kitten for you! Thanks for the GA review of Uttarakhand . Ayanosh (talk) 05:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC) No problem, I enjoyed learning about the region. Good work to yourself and other contributors Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 15:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Would you please mention it somewhere in Talk:Uttarakhand/GA2 that you passed it after keeping on hold? --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Done. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 15:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Notice to DR/N volunteers! Dispute resolution discussions need attention Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there are currently discussions at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard which require the attention of a volunteer. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. Below this message is the DR/N status update. You are receiving this notification to request assistance at the DR/N where you are listed as a volunteer. The number of cases has either become too large and/or there are many cases shaded with an alert status. Those shaded pink are marked as: "This request requires a volunteer's attention". Those shaded blue have had a volunteers attention recently Case Created Last volunteer edit Last modified Title Status User Time User Time User Time RRR Closed SaibaK (t) 4 days, 19 hours Robert McClenon (t) 19 hours Robert McClenon (t) 19 hours If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options. Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 00:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Always use {{subst :DRN Volunteer-notice }} when using this template as notification. If your replies are directed to the template talkpage, the template was used without subst.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks Thank you for the respectful manner in which you offered the third opinion. ~Adjwilley (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC) No problem, glad I could help - Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 23:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Hello, Cabe6403. You have new messages at Wilhelmina Will's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Prescott Studios Dear Cabe6403. My Wikipedia name is Italo Tedesco and my real name Mauro Conti. I would like to explain you why «Prescott Studio» shouldn't be delete. - Surtitling (the theatrical version of subtitling, created in 1984, in Canada) is one of the most relevant newness in the field of translation. - Theatre (opera and drama) is the start point of every form of performing art but, today, is a very fragile artistic area because of the strong competition with every kind of video. - The use of surtitling in theatre increased a lot the audience, but it needs a several specializations to operate. - Prescott Studio, in this sense, create a particular editing system that begins to be a model for others operators. - No other company, in Europe, has been so deeply involved in surtitling as Prescott Studio. - Academic studies have been dedicated to Prescott Studio. Those are the main reasons why, I think, Prescott Studio should have a place in Wikipedia. Best regards, Mauro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Italo Tedesco (talk • contribs) 15:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Hi there Mauro, first of all, welcome to Wikipedia, I see you are relatively new. Here on wikipedia we have a number of policies that determine if a subject/event/etc is notable enough for inclusion in wikipedia. Regarding businesses those policies can be found here: WP:NCOMPANY. In order to establish notability we need to have WP:Verifiability using independent third party sources. If you can, take a read of both those pages and hopefully it will answer the question of why I have tagged the article you created for deletion. If you have further questions once you have read, feel free to ask me here. One more thing, if you are associated with Prescott Studio then you shouldn't be the one to make the article as you have a conflict of interest. If the company is notable enough, don't worry, someone will come along and make the article for you soon enough Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 15:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Hi Cabe, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the speedy deletion tag from the article. It looks like it was placed there about 2 minutes after the article was created, and I was thinking we should probably give Mauro a little more time than that to address the concerns about notability, etc. ~Adjwilley (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Lee Kaplan deletion I am puzzled by your instant deletion. Kaplan came to my attention because of this article [1] I noticed that the subject of the article Anna Baltzer has a wikipedia page. It appears to me that the level of her notability and the kind of work she does is in many ways similar to the work Kaplan does. They are both high politicized journalists working on opposite sides of a dispute. Now, if you look at this page [2] about Baltzer, you will see that the arguments for deleting her page [3] were discussed, but it was kept. I think that there should at least be a debate about kaplan's notability as there was with Baltzer.FinchleyRd (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Hi there, firstly, please take a read of WP:OTHERSTUFF, the jist of it is 'just because X exists, doesn't mean that Y should too'. Doing a quick google search there is very little in the way of WP:RS to confirm that Lee Kaplan meets WP:NJOURNALIST, i.e. 3rd party sources about himself. However, searching Anna Baltzer produces articles on her as an individual. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 16:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC) I see that the page is still up. I'll add to it. Cheers.FinchleyRd (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks. The first article I cited was a long article , a profile of kaplan and his journalism in the SF Weekly. But I'll work on it. There's a controversy about one of his article today, so others will probably add.FinchleyRd (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Your Speedy of Rose Rock IFC Hallo, Buildings aren't covered by A-7, as I understand it. I've found a reliable-looking source to add, too. PamD 17:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Lee Kaplan (journalist) Hello Cabe6403. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lee Kaplan (journalist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC) becoacht Hi Cabe, can you maybe help me with my project becoacht ? That would be really awesome. David Widmann (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hi David, I will do what I can to assist you in the creation of the article. Are you associated with Becoacht? (i.e. do you work for them, one of the founders, etc?) Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, indeed. I am the business developer at becoacht. I will add more sources to the articel but we are a new start-up and therefore we do not have too much sources. I will try my best to add as much as possible and it would be great if you could me with referencing mistakes. Thank you so much in advance. David Widmann (talk) 10:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC) David, here on wikipedia we have a number of requirements for notability the dictates whether something should be included in Wikipedia. You can find the general outline here: WP:GNG and, specifically, the part relevant to your company here: WP:NCOMPANY. Additionally, we have two policies that you may wish to read over, WP:COI and WP:NPOV. COI is about having a conflict of interest in the article which would make it difficult to retain a Neutral Point Of View. You, as the business director of the company should not be creating and editing the article as you have a COI. If the company is notable, don't worry, someone else will come along and make it sooner or later. I would suggest going over to Wikipedia:Requested articles and requesting that an article on Becoacht is created. That way someone independant to your company can work on the article. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hi Cabe, thank you very much for your answer and i totally understand that. But if you delete the article it will be still possible to write one (from another person) in the future and we will not like be baned from wiki now ? David Widmann (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hi David, no problem. You would not be banned from Wikipedia simply for creating the article. Best thing to do is wait for someone independant from you to create the article. One day you might search becoacht and discover that is exactly what has happened. As your company grows and receives independant reliable source coverage it will likely pop up here by itself. Like I say, swing by WP:RA if you wish to put in a request that someone creates an article sooner rather than later but, unfortunately, I think you might find that it won't happen just yet due to WP:NCOMPANY, at least for now anyway. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Want to know the reason for deletion of D.P. Singh page Hey Mr, Cabe6403 or whatever your name is I want to know about your eagerness to delete the page D.P.Singh i have created. Do tell me a healthy reason for that If you proposed deletion for absence of references than take a good look at the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantanu Chakraborty (talk • contribs) 13:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hi there, the references you have added are the staff pages at the university Mr Singh works at. That is nothing like enough for notability in Wikipedia's sense, which needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", that is to say not entries in lists or things that he has written, but something substantial written about him by other people. See WP:ANS for more explanation of what that means. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Cabe6403. You have new messages at Hamtechperson's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hamtechperson 14:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Bishop Moore Vidyapith Kayamkulam I don't think educational institutions are covered under A-7. Why do you think Bishop Moore Vidyapith Kayamkulam needs to be deleted when it seems to enjoy the same status and notability of Bishop Moore Vidyapith Mavelikara? Please consider the request by not removing the tag, but by reasoning the tag. I can see that the article is under development, but i don't see how it may develop with a deletion tag over it. bc-ndra (talk) 05:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 2 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RockNess 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC) UltraViolet POV Dispute Resolution Request Hi, I just found out about this request. I went to the noticeboard and didn't see an active discussion. I found a note from you buried in the history. How do I participate in the discussion? (I've never had to deal with a dispute resolution, so I don't know how this works.) Thanks. JimTheFrog (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Never mind. Looks like the person who filed it didn't do it right. JimTheFrog (talk) 04:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC) COI Notice - Folly Wildlife Rescue Hi I see that you have put a COI notice on the Folly Wildlife Rescue Trust article. I do indeed have a connection with the trust, but believe I have worded the article in a factual and neutral manner. I am new to Wikipedia so would be grateful for some advice on this as I am unsure what I have written that could be deemed biased. I have removed the part where I mention that the Trust has won local community awards as I can only assume this might be the reason? Thank you in advance. Nunnsofunky (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Hi there, I added the COI notice because you have a connection with the trust. As the primary article writer thus far it doesn't matter how neutral you attempt to write you will still have a COI. The tag will allow someone who is unaffiliated to come along at some point in the future and work/expand on the article. At which point the tag can be removed. Cheers, Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC) OK - so the notice needs to remain there on the article unless someone else unconnected with the Trust contributes? Nunnsofunky (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Oana Bogdan Hello Cabe6403. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oana Bogdan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The claim of being a government advisor on architecture is good enough to pass the relatively low bar of WP:A7. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Time on Deaths We discussed this last year. What is 5 am now EDT is the break of the new day across the world. Vanutau is the 2nd time zone into the new day. Here is a link so you can watch it. It swings 1 to 3 hours with the time zone ahead of it depending on time of year. http://www.worldtimeserver.com/current_time_in_VU.aspx . Regards. Sunnydoo (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Ah, of course. I completely forgot about timezones. Bork. I'm GMT. Please accept my appologies Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Not a problem. Comes up a couple times of year. Keep on keeping on.Sunnydoo (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC) i create the Coşkun Yılmaz biography, why you gonna delete this content.? what is wrong with this content.?