User talk:KFan II

Ahem...hello? Anyone out there?

Palpatine and Darth Sidious

Since the merging of Palpatine and Darth Sidious is under dispute, please discuss this issue on their talk pages rather than unilaterally merging them on your own. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:19, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

• Because of your recent merge war with Robeykr, I put this issue on Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Article content disputes. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:49, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

• Thank you for stopping the merge war. In the meantime, could you do me a favor? I recently spotted an anonymous user trying to unilaterally change Template:Swwiki to read "This article should be considered as a candidate to be copied to the Star Wars Wiki and then deleted." I persuaded this user to revert it back until there was a formal discussion on the change. So if you are familar and/or contribute to the Star Wars Wiki, could you please make a comment on that template's talk page. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:11, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

It looks like the concensus favors the article being merged under Palpatine. I think that if where to acknowledge this, we could go ahead and merge the articles. You've made some good points, but I think it's time to move on with this. Ace-o-aces 19:26, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

It is not time to "move on with this", Mr., Mrs., Mizz, or Miss Ace-o-aces! Also, Zzyzx11, I have not stopped the merge war! I have not had internet for the last week, actually. Also, I know nothing about a template called Swwiki. I am not the unknown user! I am now going to back to my beloved Star Wars Wiki! Adiosa! KFan II 00:12, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

adding pictures

First you have to upload the picture. Just click on the Upload File link, listed on the left side of the screen. Follow the instructions and after you've uploaded the picture, highlight and copy the Image:name of file.jpg (or whatever extention you used) tag. Now go to whatever article you want to add the picture to and paste the Image tag with the [[]] brackets around it. If its a large picture, you may have to add |thumb after the image name, but before the closing bracket.

Example:

File:Name of file.jpg

You can also use 200px or 300px (or any number) to make the picture appear smaller in the article. To add a caption to the picture (that'll appear when someone holds their cursor over the picture), add |caption|whatever text you want]]

To add a picture to a table, just use the same method, in the designated spot (usually marked as |image= | )

Thats about it. Check Help:Contents for more information. --Kross 22:57, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Thanx. KFan II

Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader

Please do not unilaterally change or move these articles without further discussion with the community. Remember what happened with the Palpatine/Darth Sidious dispute? Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• All to well. Should I consult an admin? KFan II

Ulic Qel-Droma

May I ask why you felt it necessary to add Ulic Qel-Droma as the Dark Lord of the Sith after Exar Kun without explanation? I have reverted this mistake twice already. When Ulic was a Sith, he was Exar Kun's apprentice - the apprentice to the Dark Lord, not the Dark Lord himself. He never achieved that title, as he lost his connection to the Force before his master's demise, and went into isolation shortly after. And I noticed you undid my changes for Bastila aswell. Bastila, like Ulic, was simply an apprentice (albeit for a very short time), and never achieved the status of Dark Lord of the Sith. Also, take into account what Jon Hart has been saying about the Sith Lords from KotOR II. They're just that - Sith Lords. There is only one Dark Lord of the Sith present at any time - neither had that advantage over the others, they were just equally very powerful Sith Lords. I'm going to revert the changes again - please provide some sort of logic or reason if you choose to dispute this. Thank you. Nufy8 22:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You see, Ulic Qel-Droma was Dark Lord of the Sith for a very, very short time between the time his master died and Darth Revan took over. Same thing with Bastila Shan. Afterwards, the duo of Darth Nihilus and Darth Sion took over. Even if they were only the leaders of the Sith Order for a day or so, at that time, they were officially the leaders. I am reverting the changes you made. KFan II

• Could you back that up in any form by chance? I'm wondering how he took on the mantle of Dark Lord of the Sith after Exar's death when he was unable to the feel force - and how the sources I've been reading (such as the Star Wars Databank) say nothing of him returning to the Sith ways after he was cut off from the Force. That goes hand in hand with Bastila - I fail to see where you've come to this conclusion. And, like I said, there can only be one true Dark Lord of the Sith at one time - I doubt there is knowledge out there of Nihilus or Sion taking the title of Dark Lord for only a few days, and it seems like pure speculation to me. But, alas, to avoid an all out edit-war, I won't revert again until we have others comment on this, to add their thoughts. Nufy8 22:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree with you. Let's not have an edit war. I wanted to say one thing. The case with Sion and Nihilus...its an exception to the "one Dark Lord" rule. They were the heads of the Sith Order for ??? years, not just a few days. The following Dark Lords were on only for a few days or less:
• Ulic Qel-Droma
• Bastila Shan
  • • Ok, I understand the Sith Lords from KotOR II being the leaders of the Sith in their time, but can we really refer to them as Dark Lords of the Sith in that case? And how do we know this was meant as an exception that would deliberately change the title of Dark Lord of the Sith? Also - you keep saying that Ulic and Bastila were respective Dark Lords for only a few days, yet I still don't see where you're getting this from. Nufy8 23:00, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • I'm sorry, Nufy8, I don't know where I got it from, but I remember I did get it from somewhere. Maybe from a Star Wars book? Yes, that must have been it, since I didn't get it from the internet. Sion and Nihilus could bend the rules because noone was stopping them, really. KFan II 23:03, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
        • Please, if you would, cite and quote from any books where it is stated that Ulic or Bastila was the Dark Lord of the Sith. Nufy8 23:07, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
          • I don't remember where I got it from, besides the fact that it was not from the internet. Please, if you could, find out where I got it from. I know it is official (unless a LusasThing lied). KFan II 23:09, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
            • You probably shouldn't be adding content that you are unable to verify. It's your responsibility to fact check when you add content, not mine. Nufy8 00:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've checked with Tales of the Jedi: The Sith War- Ulic repents, and is severed (like the Jedi Exile) from the Force before he betrays Exar Kun, and causes Kun's death/ascencion; thus Ulic could never have been the Dark Lord. The arguments against Bastilla I've already said. --maru 01:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't get it. To be a Dark Lord of the Sith, do you have to have a connection to the Force? Also, if you are blocked from the force, don't you die? If you don't, it is against George Lucas's "vision", as Supershadow - a fraud, by the way - would say. I still have the impression that Ulic would be a Dark Lord. When Ulic betrayed Kun, how did the Sith legacy get passed on? --KFan II 14:19, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes to the first (the essence of being a Sith, and thus a Dark Lord, is their peculiar perversion of the Force), no to the second (did Ulic die when Naomi blocked him? Did the Jedi Exile die when he severed himself from the Force?). Ulic very much repented- he was wandering the galaxy seeking forgiveness, some way he could 'become a Jedi again'- does that sound very evil and Sith-y to you? And the Sith legacy got passed on the way it had before- artifacts, places of darkness, Sith spirits (hm... like the one of Freedon Nadd, who instructed Exar Kun in the Sith ways? Or like Kyp Durron and Exar Kun? For that matter, where did Revan get his instruction?) etc. --maru 15:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

So Ulic's not a Dark Lord person! Okay!I'll fix that. Thanx. --KFan II 15:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Good, we settled that pretty well. Thanks for your help, Maru. On another note, are you still disputing Bastila's Dark Lord/Lady of the Sith title or should we remove the succession box on her page? Nufy8 18:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Still disputing. KFan II 18:51, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bastila had to be a Dark Lord of the Sith. After all, wasn't she trained by Malak? She must have inherited the title. True? KFan II 18:51, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just discovered this is true. It says so in the article that after Malak died, she became Revan's apprentice. Since Revan wasn't on the Dark Side, Bastila assumed this role. Afterwards she was defeated, so then her "reign" - I guess you could call it - was taken over by Darth Traya. KFan II 18:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In the light side ending, Bastila is converted by Revan before Malak dies, so she does not take on the title. For the dark side ending, after Malak dies, she does indeed become Revan's apprentice. However, Revan did turn to the dark side (hence dark side ending), and took the title of Dark Lord of the Sith before he went missing. Whether Bastila inherits the title after Revan leaves is never stated. --Nufy8 20:04, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Irrelevant. The succession boxes deal with what is canon, not the varied possibilities. We can't actually say what happens after Revan bugs out for the Unknown regions in the dark side ending of KOTOR II, because the source which would tell us, KOTOR II, tells only what happens after the light side ending. In the canon ending, the Light side ending, Bastilla is killed (?)/converted back to the Lightside, before Revan confronts and kills Malak. And KOTOR II tells us she never relapses, so the segment of time where she could have become Dark Lord, she didn't. --maru 22:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay, here's the way things are. The light side ending of Knights of the Old Republic is the canon ending, i.e. the one that "really" happened. Therefore, Revan redeemed Bastila, killed Malak, and saved the Republic as a Jedi. You will note, of course, that Bastila was redeemed before the death of Darth Malak, the reigning Dark Lord of the Sith. This means that Bastila was never, at any time, in any way, shape, or form, the Dark Lord of the Sith. She is alive, well, and still a Jedi in The Sith Lords. That's it. --Jon Hart

Precisely what I meant! You said it much better than I. --maru 01:30, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about everything, you obviously know Star Wars better than me. I just assumed that Shan would be Malak's apprentice, since he trained her. Lucasfilm people should make Star Wars easier to follow. KFan II

I see you've changed pages to include that the trio from The Sith Lords be included as Dark Lords of the Sith. Like the edit summaries on the history pages say, you need to provide some sort of proof of this. It's never said that either of them are Dark Lords of the Sith. I'm going to revert those changes... Nufy8

• Wait a sec, Nufy8. In a very old version of Darth Malak's page, it said he was succeeded by the triad of Traya, Nihilus, and Sion. Then I realized this could be impossible, because Traya was the master of both. Because of this, she succeeded Malak, and in turn Sion and Nihilus both succeeded their master. Since I have not read up that much on thier histories, I asssume they didn't murder each other. It seems Sion was somehow convinced by Exile to kill himself, but I don't know what happened to Nihilus. KFan II 17:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Traya succeeded Malak in terms of becoming the more powerful of the Lords who would attempt to lead the Sith, but not necessarily take on the title "Dark Lord of the Sith". When Sion and Nihilus betrayed Traya, both took their own paths - neither unified the Sith under one command, and the persona of Darth Traya was temporarily abandoned. Sion does indeed kill himself, but before that (yet still at the end of KotOR II), Nihilus is vanquished on his ship by the Jedi Exile. Nufy8 18:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Speculation about Mew and Lucario

Could you please not insert speculation into the Mew (Pokémon) or Lucario articles unless you're prepared to cite sources? There's no evidence that Mew and Lucario are linked by evolution, as far as I'm aware. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:43, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Lordkaan.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lordkaan.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion★talk 07:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Calsusie.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Calsusie.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 15:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Moonforwiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Moonforwiki.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 17:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I recreated the image from scratch since it's just the intersection of two circles, and reuploaded it. Please advise if that raises concerns for you. PS there is a wiki for LEGO, http://brickwiki.org, it's linkable here and it has a dearth of brickwiki:Bionicle articles. If you can add stuff there, that would be swell! Just make sure you adhere to how things are done there and you can be sure your additions will be well received. ++Lar: t/c 18:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Calworm.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Calworm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 14:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Calmoe.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Calmoe.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jacki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I know it

Hi. I think we know each other. Anyway, I found another competitor wiki and a... well, something related to Code: LYOKO. I'm also pretty sure I know who the leader/maker of Code Lyoko Wiki is, and he's at Code: WIKI. I'll only tell you this if you unblock me at Code: WIKI. And if you unblock, then block me indefinitely again, well... I have 4 other IP addresses. I promise I won't add anything about Code Aelita, either way. - 82^Something

You forgot to unblock my IP address. It autoblocks the user account if it's been recently used by a blocked IP address. - IP Address

What's your IP address? KFan II 17:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I forget most of it, but it begins with 67. It's the only one that begins with 67, and is currently blocked for infinite time. - Nam sdrawkcaB's IP address

There. I unblocked your IP adress. Now who created Code Lyoko and Code Lyoko Jc? I must know! KFan II 17:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Code WIKI's gone!

Code WIKI's gone! --User:Angie Y.

Oh no! This cannot be happening! I've contacted RobKohr, Angie, everything will be okay, I promise. Its a site error, Angie, nothing more. And if not, we'll recreate it via Wikia. Don't worry, Ang, Code: WIKI will not just disappear one day. I'll see to that! KFan II 02:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

I sure hope so. With all these disagreements we've been having, I'm sure it won't either. --User:Angie Y.

I am a Code:LYOKO fan, too!

I just wanted to say hello. Code:Lyoko's elements contain my favorite genres.

My favorite character is XANA. The plot twists are really neat, too, huh? Xana1 20:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree thoroughly. Check out Code: WIKI, the free Code Lyoko wiki if you like it. The plots are excellent, I must agree. KFan II 02:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Homo, Template:Human Evolution, Homo (genus)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Look, why do you classify Wikipedians as another species if they are not? KFan II 16:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean? Where are Wikipedians classified as another species? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

On this page. KFan II 18:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that's a joke. It's not in the main encyclopedia. Consider this your last warning. Vandalize again and I'll block you. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. Jeez. KFan II 01:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Help!

Excuse me, al-mighty Supercomputer. I am Xana1, remember? I am blocked from Code:WIKI for doing nothing. Can you help? My IP address is 12.211.93.190. Thanks! Xana1 19:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Xana, you tried to delete everything. That's not what I call "not doing anything". KFan II 01:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, yeah. Xana1 20:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 20:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

What do you have to say for yourself? KFan II 22:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I heard that some guy using the name Xana hurt your Wiki. I didn't do it! P.S. That's what the 'oh, yeah' was for. Xana1 21:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

You can't worm yourself out of this. Your IP address, 12.211.93.190, was deleting everything on the wiki. KFan II 21:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

That was my brother! He deletes things on all my favorite websites! Have mercy! P.S. You are so cool.Xana1 20:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

You honestly think I'm going to believe that? KFan II 02:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, you are stupid, after all. Xana1 20:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Right. So, I'm very stupid. Because I am very stupid, I need you to explain to me why I should believe that. KFan II 21:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

That is the role of stupid people in American and World Society. To believe whatever their smarter superiors say without question or comment. Xana1 16:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

How dare you talk to me that way! I am the future Emperor of the Planet, and all opposition will be crushed when I take control! So respect me - you do not know what the future holds. What were we talking about again? Oh yes. How can Code: WIKI be sure you are not just making this "little brother" business of yours up? KFan II 17:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Because that is your place. Believe all your superiors like XANA, stupid monkey boy! P.S. With people like our beloved President Bush influencing America, you have no chance at even cleaning dishes for the government. Xana1 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

You are not my superior, and you just called me stupid. Well, I will have to talk to Angela about this... KFan II 22:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

XANA IS YOUR SUPERIOR NOW AND FOREVER MORE! --Xana1 20:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

If by "Angela" you mean me, KFan, then I'm all ears. --User:Angie Y.

Not you, Angie. I mean Angela Beesley, one of the primary administrators of Wikipedia. Is Angie really short for Angela? KFan II 19:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello? Hello? Anybody out there? I'm still here! P.S. How could you possibly be a genius if you didn't know Angie meant Angela?! Xana1 21:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

The Hello? Anybody out there? message was when I fits came to Wikiped the Pedia of All Pedias. And do not quetion my genius, Xana1! KFan II 00:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

You are full of grammar mistakes. Do not quetion my genius? message was when I fits? Weirdo! Xana1 19:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Your reverted messages

There's a difference between discouraging current talk and spamming the same message on talk pages for no apparent reason. What you did was in no way helpful. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Someguy, it seems whatever you do is with reason, and whatever I do is stupid. Why is this so? KFan II 22:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Let me explain. You posted your message in sections which hadn't been responded to in weeks. They already dropped the discussion. You're not helping by posting that link in the section. It's also fairly clear you're only doing so because I discouraged your link spamming earlier. I am not saying anything about your actions being stupid. I'm saying they're inappropriate. At the very least, you should have been clearer in your messages. Just linking to the soapbox section isn't that helpful. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

One other thing. It's not very helpful to go about listing me and anyone else you disagree with as an enemy on your userpage. It only erodes your own position. For your own good, I'd suggest taking it down. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:57, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Its my userpage, you do not dictate what is on it and what is not. KFan II 23:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm not dictating anything. I'm suggesting for your own good that you take it down. It comes dangerously close to violating WP:CIVIL, and there's no point in breaking policy out of spite. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Look, Someguy, why don't we just make a compromise: I'll stop bothering you, and we put a link to Code: WIKI from the Code Lyoko page - once I've fixed it, of course. Due to the fact its offline, I can't really do that. KFan II 23:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

So, let me get this straight, you're blackmailing me? You're joking, right? I've told you why you're website doesn't belong. On top of that, it's a dead link until Thursday, so there's really no point in adding it. If and when you fix it I'd have no problem with you adding it, so that's not a concern, but believe me when I say you're a long way off. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't blackmailing you, I'm I made it seem that way. What I mean is we've had this whole war about things, and it is not a dead link! The person who manages my servers, the Robert Kohr, is just moving my website to a more reliable network. I just want to stop fighting! How can you not see my point of view? Code: WIKI is a good site for several reasons.

1. Although Wikipedia is an excellent site, Code: WIKI provides interesting information Wikipedia might overlook.
2. It allows for general discussion about topics in semi-forum-like manner, which Wikipedia does not provide.
3. It provides a vast array of images for secondary characters and episodes Wikipedia doesn't have.
4. It mostly has canon, most fanon is in the process of being pointed out, marked, and/or destroyed.
5. Code: WIKI provides in-depth infornmation about episodes, such as animation errors, trivia, and pictures for every episode - which we will have soon.

Someguy, you are just deleting the link to Code: WIKI out of spite, I know, because in the past, you had edited Code: WIKI, and banished you. I realize now that I was wrong - you were merely trying to help the site. The problem was that I (having not seen Season 2) thought you were trying to delete everything. I apologize for my brash response, but your edits were so drastic I misinterpreted them. You should have left notes on the talk pages that would have been considered by users.

I am sorry. You are welcome to contribute to Code: WIKI, its just that it will be offline until the week of May 14-20, during which it will reopen. Please reconsider the link thing. Look forward to various interesting debates on Code: WIKI! KFan II 00:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I also did not make up the "Lyoko Monarch" entry. It's hinted at throughout the show, especially in "The Key". --User:Angie Y.

But you did, Angie, make up Leon Corbet. So, Someguy, what do you say? KFan II 00:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The Lyoko Monarchy thing isn't canon (absolute masters =/= monarchy), and Leon Corbet is an actual person in the show, KFan. She's right about him. Also, you never banished me. I can edit there just as easily now as I could then. I choose not to because of confrontational and overly stubborn attitude you take on that website. I removed the link here because of the terribly inaccurate information I found while surfing that site. Also, a dead link is a link that doesn't work. Your link is dead for the moment. The description is accurate. Now to cover your points.

1. Name one.
2. Wikipedia isn't a forum, and the fact that you are more leinent about that on your website is not a qualifying factor.
3. And? What does that have to do with anything? So you have more pictures. That doesn't mean your content is better (and it isn't).
4. Last I checked, that process is nowhere near completed.
5. This is the only thing that is somewhat relevant, but does not excuse the rest of your site. Wikipedia isn't a trivia site, so small animation errors are not a concern. Plus, I've read your trivia. It's wrong in quite a few instances. For example, the tower in "Teddygozilla" does glow red.

That pretty much covers my point. Generalized information on unimportant characters is not helpful, and images are only marginally so. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 00:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Are you a pessimist, Someguy? Because why do you never look at the good things about Code: WIKI? KFan II 00:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I look at the overall view. Unfortunately for you, most of that is pessimistic in nature. Your episode summaries are a good point, but they're not complete. Pictures are only so useful, and as I've mentioned in other talk pages, there are external links to complete galleries, eliminating the need for them to be here. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 00:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

So basically, what you're saying is that galleries with no captions whatsoever and no bios of the characters, episode sumaries, creator biographies, and other miscellanea, are better than Code: WIKI. Well, I've got ~50 users and more than 100000 views is a good site. KFan II 03:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

What biographes do you have? "This guy danced on a table." "This guy was a zombie." "This guy played soccer." How very useful. Don't overplay minor things in an attempt to bloat your site's importance. Also, your site has virtually zero Google hits, mostly due to your poor choice of a title. You don't have biographies of the minor characters, because nothing has been said about them. You have random facts. You don't have biographies of the creators, either. You have two-line entries that state what they do. You have completely biased articles on other websites, clearly demeaning then in favor of your own tiny wiki. You're constantly paranoid about every other Code Lyoko wiki on that site, even going to far to announce it as some sort of event. You keep blaming Angie for every problem I point out, even going so far as to accuse her of completely making up a factual article (Leon Corbet). I could go on. Point is, your site not nearly as important as you think it is. I suggest you realize that instead of cligning to your belief that 50 people (most of whom do not contribute) somehow makes your site important. At the rate you're going, your site will never be accurate. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 04:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Alright, you win, Someguy. Personally, I don't care. I wouldn't care if I had only one other user who contributed. Because some people like my site. I have at least seven people working on it, including Angie Y., myself, Gandalf1992, Xana, Magus, Sharp, and Backwards Man. Although they might not contribute anymore for whatever reason, that's all the people I need.

Oh, and by the way, all the other Code Lyoko wikis were made by people who did not like me. KFan II 04:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Code WIKI has a few problems

Code WIKI's name has been changed and very few people are editing now. For the Realm, I'll also need help creating the "upload file" directory, like on Code WIKI. --User:Angie Y.