Jump to content

User talk:Malik Shabazz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikiman2244 (talk | contribs) at 20:35, 3 January 2014 (→‎J Street U edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

Why you deleted my Article

Hey, May I know why you have deleted my article, if it was based on real person with citation than why you are getting pain from it. Here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usama_abbasi

You can tell me on my email too which is abbasi9211@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.48.236.128 (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User:Malik Shabazz/CSD#A7. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

My overwriting of your response was accidental. Sposer (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was no big deal. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About Port City International University Page

HI As far as I know you've deleted that page. But I'd like to say it should be in Wikipedia. coz other's university page's are in wikipedia, so whats wrong about this page? I thought Later I'll update that page.but now I don't get it to edit to add more info so hope you'll consider to give it back

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipoon07 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The page was copied and pasted from another website in violation of copyright law. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Funnel Design Group

Regarding this page. I tried to just put facts about this organization with no promotional info. I do know the user name 'funnel design group' adding a page called 'funnel design group' throws up red flags. I just want the location of this organization and who it is to be out there and factual. If you disagree, please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchanging (talk • contribs) 15:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In order to qualify for an encyclopedia article, a company must be "notable". Please see WP:COMPANY, the relevant notability guideline. If Funnel Design Group satisfies the guideline, please write a new article by summarizing in your own words what reliable sources have written about them. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish land purchase in palestine

I think a book is a good source, why did you delete my citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.94.113 (talk) 17:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources. I don't think The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem qualifies as a reliable source. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Drop Internet Radio

Why was the page deleted? i asked for a reason and u just had it removed? Can you please enlighten me please — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveArm (talk • contribs) 20:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The page was deleted because it was promotional (see WP:G11) and failed to explain why The Drop is important or significant (see WP:A7). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBC_Radio_Overnight <<<

Numerous pages you can remove too — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveArm (talk • contribs) 20:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre.fm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_Rock_Radio — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveArm (talk • contribs) 20:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Left Hand of God (novel)

The Left Hand Of God (Novel) page you deleted, and some how redirected to some form of religious text, is infact a Sci-Fi book written by a different author, in a different year. I will leave links below to prove it, one being a wiki page that clearly defines a difference between The Left Hand Of God written by Paul Hoffman in 2010 and the other, written by Michael Lerner in 2006.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Hand_of_God (this being the article that defines there is a difference)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Left-Hand-God-Paul-Hoffman/dp/0141042370 (This, clearly a non-existant novel i am definatley not reading)

and finally, http://www.harpercollins.com/books/Left-Hand-God-Michael-Lerner/?isbn=9780060873738 (clearly not the same book as the previous link)

Restore the page. 2.29.204.49 (talk) 22:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, there has never been a Wikipedia article about the novel The Left Hand of God. This morning, another editor moved the page about the religious book to the title The Left Hand of God (novel) and I moved it back (because it's not the novel). I deleted the page titled "novel" so that readers would see a red link instead of a Wikilink when they see that name. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please Delete my account

Please Delete my account.

Or send me the instructions on how to Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by House of Sextazy (talk • contribs) 02:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid there is no way to delete an account, but you can blank your Talk page (just edit the page and delete everything on it) and leave Wikipedia. If that's what you want to do. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If my account cannot be deleted then please remove you libelous statement accusing me of Copyright Infringement. NOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by House of Sextazy (talk • contribs) 02:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I AM A PUBLISHED AND COPYWRITTEN AUTHOR OF 25 YEARS AND OVER 400 RHYMES, SONGS AND SHORT STORIES. I AM ALSO THE OWNER OF THE WEBSITE AND PROFILES WHERE MY WORK IS PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED BY ME, THE AUTHOR AND OWNER. I AM INSULTED BY YOUR INABILITY TO COMMUNICATE IN A PROPER MANNER ABOUT YOUR QUESTIONS AND YOUR PUBLIC DELETION AND ACCUSATION OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IS LIBELOUS AND DEFAMING TO MY PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION.

I AM DISAPPOINTED THAT MY MATERIAL DID NOT SUIT YOUR GUIDLINES. I WONT COME BACK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by House of Sextazy (talk • contribs) 02:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Theroy of Evolution

Can it be deleted on some other basis? I personally don't care as I was not involved in the creation of the page (nor have contributed to it). I just happened to notice the spelling error and thought would reported to keep the encyclopedia "clean". Since you seem to be more familiar than I regarding delete criteria, perhaps you can nominate it for deletion under the proper cause factor. Whatever... Mercy11 (talk) 03:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can bring the matter to WP:Redirects for discussion and ask that the page be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry? Perhaps you did not understand what I meant when I said "Whatever". So, over and out. Mercy11 (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Ratchford - deletion

Hello Malik,

I am writing to you in an attempt to get clarification on your recent deletion of my article "Abigail Ratchford" ... 04:32, 30 December 2013 Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) deleted page Abigail Ratchford (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion (CSDH))

Abigail Ratchford [[1]] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abigail_Ratchford

Could you tell me how I could get my article restored?

I am very willing to address all concerns of yours in this matter, and I certainly appreciate your knowledge and help/guidance through the Wikipedia experience. My article for Abigail is definitely a "legitimate" article for a brand new star in the modeling world who, as you could see from the content, has been extremely successful. I plan to add much more to this article, as Abigail is embarking on several noteworthy endeavors.

Also, could you provide me with the text of my article? It seems to have disappeared, and I would like to retain it in order to make any necessary amendments.

I appreciate your time Malik, as I know you are most likely extremely busy. I am anxious to hear from you soon, and hopefully fix this situation to your standards.

Thank you, and Happy New Year!!

Scoocher16

Scoocher16 (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC) --Scoocher16 (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to write a new article about Abigail Ratchford that satisfies Wikipedia's requirements is to summarize in your own words what reliable sources have written about her. (Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources to get a sense of what types of sources are considered reliable.) Please don't copy and paste text from Ratchford's Tumblr page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Malik. Can you restore the article, and I can edit the text appropriately? I can do this immediately. Or, could you provide me with the text from my original article, so I can amend it (it is now not visible anywhere)? I am part of Miss Ratchford's management team, and I wasn't aware that the content was also used on her Tumblr page. I can easily change the verbiage.
Scoocher16 (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only the opening paragraph was similar to the Tumblr page ... common content we use for her in various outlets. the bulk of the article was unique content.
Scoocher16 (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored it to User:Scoocher16/Abigail Ratchford. When you've finished working on it, you can move it back by following the instructions at WP:Moving a page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Malik. I am working on it now. I really appreciate that.
Scoocher16 (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Malik. I just "moved" the article back to Abigail Ratchford. I edited the intro paragraph completely, and I believe that it should now comply with your standards. Can I now have the two alerts at the top of the page removed? For "This page is a new unreviewed article." and "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline."?
Thank you again for your help. i very much appreciate it.
Scoocher16 (talk) 17:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I now notice an alert ... This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion for the following reasons: ...
How do I get that removed? Is this something you can do?
Scoocher16 (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read what I wrote about using reliable sources? Where are they? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have several sources cited throughout the article ... from the websites themselves ... where the content is derived from.
Scoocher16 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But they're not considered reliable sources. It's a moot point now, as another administrator has deleted the article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand ... the sources are where the information is drawn from. How could they be "unreliable"?
Scoocher16 (talk) 18:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources. We need secondary sources about Abigail Ratchford, not links to websites where her pictures have appeared. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected Speedy Deletion of Catanese Disambiguation

Malik,

I am writing you about the rejected speedy deletion of the redirect page "Catanese". I completely agree that it should be turned into a disambiguation as you noted. I am still fairly new to the wiki world, so I was not able to figure out a way to change the name of the page to "Catanese (disambiguation)". Is there a way I can do this, and also remove my request to create a new page with that name?

Thanks,

Mr. Neo Anderson (talk) 15:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neo. I'm not sure the page needs "(disambiguation)" at the end of the title, but if you feel it does you can move ("rename") a page by following the instructions at WP:Moving a page. You can remove your AfC request by adding {{db-g7}} to the page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Malik,
I requested a move to "Catanese (disambiguation)" and put a delete request on the new page I created, as you advised. If you do not think that "(disambiguation)" is necessary in the name, feel free to remove it. Looking at your talk page, I see that being an admin is pretty hard work at times. Thanks for teaching me something new.
Mr. Neo Anderson (talk) 17:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IAFD

Happy (almost) New Year Malik! :) With all of the conversation going on, I was checking out the IAFD article and noticed that some of the "obvious things" were missing and started a Google news and book search along with checking AVN for citable references. It's not my intention to add content just for the sale of content. I want IAFD to be treated as a WP:RS and so I'm adding information that a someone that is completely ignorant of the site might find edifying. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year to you, too! In general, IAFD isn't a reliable source (neither is IMDB), and rewriting the article isn't going to change that.
By the way, the source you added to the first paragraph (The Complete Internet Pornography Encyclopedia) is a collection of Wikipedia articles. It can't be used as a source (see WP:MIRROR). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, crap. I was trying to see if that was the case, but couldn't find it. Thank you for doing so, I'll keep looking,. I found some good stuff for the media section. Plus I'm the one that wrote about the statistical study that Millard did. I don't know if IAFD will ever be beyond reproach, but it has its uses and a certain level of reliability. Again, I'm trying to educate the uninformed. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A user edited source may well itself be notable, but its coverage of a topic can't be used to establish notability of that topic. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And you're referring to what? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am referring to your comment at the beginning of this thread, namely, "I want IAFD to be treated as a WP:RS". User edited websites like IMDb and Wikipedia itself are not considered reliable sources. The same applies to IAFD. We need coverage in reliable sources to establish notability of a topic or as references for any claims likely to be challenged in an article about a notable topic. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I get it, its your source of information about IMDb and IAFD that is faulty or incomplete, hence your statement, "User edited websites...". First off, both IMDb (owned by Amazon) and IAFD have paid staff that fact check information before its made live in their primary databases. As for-profit companies, neither is interested in being sued for posting false information that could affect the livelihood of the people listed on it. I don't know if IAFD has been sued, but Amazon has. Hence the paid staff and fact checkers.

Now, are there areas of each site that ARE user edited such as discussion forums, yes - no question about it. But if you're going to discredit the entire site base on that, almost every online news source will have to be discredited because they contain similar "user edited areas" as well.

So explain to me again why IAFD can't be considered a reliable source, at least in part? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, ya... sorry

Hi... I see your deleting my pages from my userspaces straight after I nominate them... ya... just thought I say sorry because I am not done yet... I still have at least 20 left... spring cleaning for 2014 and all that. Sorry again and happy new year if it is 2014 for you. :) --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 03:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Happy new year to you, too! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Be right back in eight minutes... almost there!!! --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now HAPPY NEW YEARS! First edit of the year! Thanks mate! --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Malik Shabazz!

Happy New Year!
Hello Malik Shabazz:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 05:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

DYK for The Diary of Malcolm X

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Malik Shabazz

Pratyya (Hello!) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2014. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2014 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2014 goes well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

--Pratyya (Hello!) 13:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Government Ship Stanley

Oh, dear. In trying to undo all the damage I've done, I can't seem to find the original text for Canadian Government Ship Stanley. I thank you for all your help with Canadian Government Ship Minto, which has now been restored to its pre-Shawn state, and I'd like to ask you if you could also please recreate Canadian Government Ship Stanley, or provide me with the text so I could? Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you moved it to Stanley (icebreaker). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank goodness, there it is. Never again! Not a nautical editor, me... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Evans (artist)

Howdy! This article was recently deleted. Could you put a copy of it in my user space please? Thanks in advance, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've restored it to User:Pdfpdf/Bernard Evans (artist). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kai bannister

(kai Douglas-Bannister) and the article is about me and my life — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparkskai11 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice. Please read User:Malik Shabazz/CSD#A7. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

its an honor sir

great job on the interview go get them neo cons! [2] Vizier loki (talk) 08:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've got me confused with Malik Zulu Shabazz. No connection. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 14:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of Breaking the silence

You seem to ignore other users that are deleting my contributions. The article is in violation of Wikipedia's honesty and integrity standards. If I'm in violation of undoing their reversal of my work, they should also be held to the same standard of multiple edits. (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman2244 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Has any editor undone your changes more than once? You're the one who's edit warring, not them.
By the way, there's a one revert restriction on the article, which means editors are not permitted to make more than one reversion during any 24-hour period. That's true of all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed. You can read more about it at WP:ARBPIA#Further remedies and WP:1RR. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J Street U edit

Hello, Thank you for cleaning some things up. However, I noticed that you changed the words "Many students" to "Some students". Your edit seems to lack honesty considering the following: J Street U received 2 votes in favor and 8 votes against joining the Berkley's JSU. This reveals that many (or if I can be more specific) the majority of the board denied the group's membership. The article also quotes the following: “For a lot of members … the (Jewish Student Union is) the only place where they can express their love for Israel because of such an anti-Israel campus climate,” Torbati said. “A lot of people have said that they want the (Jewish Student Union) to stay a place they feel comfortable saying they love Israel.” I would like to change the wording to many or the majority. Please advise on my ability to take the following action so that I can stay within the Wikipedia editing guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman2244 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tell you what "lacks honesty"—confusing the action of eight members of the JSU board with the views of the majority of Berkeley's students. I know you would like to change the article to say "many or the majority". The problem is that the facts—and the sources—don't support your interpretation of the situation. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be confusing the "views of the majority of Berkeley's students" with the votes and voices of the JSU. Your self proclaimed neutrality is in question. Wikiman2244
No, I think it is you who are confusing the two. You wrote "Many of the students", which means "many of the students [at Berkeley]", not "many of the JSU board members". — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think we can agree that in order to keep the article honest it should state, "The majority of the Berkley's JSU board members" and then elaborate about the exact voting numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman2244 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Malik_Shabazz&oldid=589029398"