Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kudpung (talk | contribs) at 07:34, 19 January 2014 (→‎User:Davidelit: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add requestview requests)
Bot that is creating lots of needed reviews on pages such as this and this--Mdann52talk to me! 08:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded, for what it's worth - assuming the bot is (or can be) programmed to review its reverts. A significant fraction of the reviewing I've done over the past few days has been approving PseudoBot reversions to days of the year. I haven't seen a false positive yet. --ElHef (Meep?) 05:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@ElHef: it should automatically be accepted by the PC software. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Quite right, I was getting mixed up by some functionality I was seeing from Twinkle. Thanks for the correction. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have Mickey Rooney on my watchlist and believe my 'Reviewer' access can be useful for it Lyverbe (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to review and verify the information suggested by contributors about the new and subsisting articles included in Wikipedia.org either in my native language (i.e., Arabic) or in the English language. Eyadnalsamman (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Eyadnalsamman: Are you aware what you can do with this right? --Mdann52talk to me! 08:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. User has only 65 mainspace edits and does not appear to fully understand what this tool is for. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So I can approve or deny pending edits as I come across them and where I feel comfortable making that judgement call. —Locke Coletc 02:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 14:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My experience on Wikipedia is of about four years, with multiple articles created and multiple issues improved and long experience in fighting sock-puppets and trolls. My long-going work on the List of ongoing armed conflicts article led me to this request. GreyShark (dibra) 19:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 14:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Back after a Wiki-break to find I have a number of frequently vandalized but infrequently (properly) edited pages, mostly related to Indonesia, on my watchlist, and it would be handy to be able to approve them (or not). Davidelit (Talk) 04:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I want to review pending changes :D Newyorkadam (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done use it well --Guerillero | My Talk 22:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I recently received rollback rights and figured I'd ask here. I generally have not come across pages that require edit reviews, but felt if I was exploring Wikipedia outside my little work area, I could be a help to editors of review-locked pages and aid in the process. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm already a Wikipedia rollbacker, and looking at everybody else using Popups, it seems like everybody else is also a reviewer, and I want to join the crowd! But for more reasonable reasons, I would like reviewer status because I sometimes track down vandalism on articles with pending changes protection. If the protection level automatically accepts autoconfirmed users, then it's no big deal. However, if the protection level is a bit stricter, then my edit has to be confirmed by a reviewer. I don't want to waste other reviewers time when I've already identified an edit as vandalism and know for sure it doesn't belong. K6ka (talk | contrib) 02:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]