User talk:12.189.68.253

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Prohibition in the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prohibition in the United States was changed by 12.189.68.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921944 on 2014-01-09T15:23:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prohibition in the United States with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Racial segregation in the United States, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Prohibition in the United States, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prohibition, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mark Hamill, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pez was changed by 12.189.68.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873085 on 2014-02-05T16:20:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Potassium, you may be blocked from editing. J991 18:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Potassium. --   Edderso     talk    contribs  18:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Gilliam (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

12.189.68.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No one is here after 4:15 PM so its very weird that there are edits after, also I (supercell121 is my wikipedia) revert vandalism on this IP if it is the current and no bot has reverted it 12.189.68.253 (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No one is here after 4:15 PM so its very weird that there are edits after, also I (supercell121 is my wikipedia) revert vandalism on this IP if it is the current and no bot has reverted it [[Special:Contributions/12.189.68.253|12.189.68.253]] ([[User talk:12.189.68.253#top|talk]]) 17:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No one is here after 4:15 PM so its very weird that there are edits after, also I (supercell121 is my wikipedia) revert vandalism on this IP if it is the current and no bot has reverted it [[Special:Contributions/12.189.68.253|12.189.68.253]] ([[User talk:12.189.68.253#top|talk]]) 17:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No one is here after 4:15 PM so its very weird that there are edits after, also I (supercell121 is my wikipedia) revert vandalism on this IP if it is the current and no bot has reverted it [[Special:Contributions/12.189.68.253|12.189.68.253]] ([[User talk:12.189.68.253#top|talk]]) 17:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

No one is here after 4:15 PM so its very weird that there are edits after, also I (supercell121 is my wikipedia) revert vandalism on this IP if it is the current and no bot has reverted it

---