Jump to content

Talk:Pawan Kalyan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 125.22.43.14 (talk) at 09:32, 13 March 2014 (→‎image). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
WikiProject iconIndia: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in April 2012.

image

I thought Wikipedia didn't accept images like that (I mean see how it says Indiglitz)--71.163.64.48 23:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name

There is caste name included in the Birth Place category. Since these two are two different entities and cannot be grouped together I am deleting the caste entry. Please avoid such entries and feel free to contact me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinadh.munipalli (talkcontribs) 17:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article looks more like a fan page than a neutral unbiased article on the actor. Please be more unbiased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vvmanoj (talkcontribs) 07:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC) Age seems to be a joke[reply]

I visited this page some years back and as quoted below it showed his year of birth as 1973. Now it shows 1971. The claim that he is 39 years old is a joke. He must be at least 44. Going by the pictures of his childhood with his brothers as correctly cited below.

Pawan's DOB is a joke and a fraud. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangosnip (talkcontribs) 12:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mspraveen's cleanup vs previous (and now reverted-to) form? The cleanup is huge improvement. The other is a large amount of WP:POV analysis and PR/fluff wording. Uncited statements like "huge hit", "failed gigantically", etc.? Come on, just state its ranking or profits. "Every high has a low" would be good in a literary magazine, but no, it's not a certainty or true statement in context--it's just a throw-away linker between unrelated ideas, an uncited analysis by a wikipedia editor. "Known to have particular social consciousness among his fans" is even worse. There's no site proving that either he does or that he's known for it, there are just bare facts of some actions. The statement about his motivations is pure WP:OR. DMacks (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a note at the user's talk page about this. Let's see if this holds. Mspraveen (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Dmacks. This page contains abnormal amounts of inappropriate material. There are whole paragraphs of WP:PEACOCK sentences with no sources whatsoever, some of which I have just removed - but I'm sure they'll be back, given this page's editing history. And the entire section labeled "Career" needs to be rewritten to actually be about Pawan Kalyan's career. Actor articles are not supposed to contain detailed plot summaries of every movie the actor has ever been in.
I'm sure the editors who have added all this fancruft think they are helping their favorite actor, but it's really an embarrassment to the cause. If I were a popular actor, I would hope my Wikipedia article would be a well-written summary of my actual achievements, not a vapid orgy of content-free adulation. AtticusX (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I ripped out a huge hunk of it...extensive discourse and plot analysis of individual movies is WP:UNDUE and use of copyrighted images in a movie-summaries section fails WP:NFCC policy. DMacks (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gudumba shankar is average grosser and remaining movies balu abcdefg,bangaram,annavaram are flops. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.235.48.164 (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Except johnny no other movie is a flop and there is no definition for flop at wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malliktajmahal (talkcontribs) 06:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Age

I dont think Pawan's DOB mentioned in main page is correct. I have seen Chiranjeevi childhood pic and you can see age difference between(chiranjeevi born in 1955) these 2 actors not more than 10-12 years in that pic.So, his real DOB might be in early 60's, not in 70's.


http://celebs.ceeby.com/actors/pavankalyan.cfm

Pavan Kalyan is a Younger Brother of Megastar Chiranjeevi, was born on september 2nd 1973. Father Name is Konidela Venkata Rao and Mother Name is Anjana Devi. He started his filmi career with 'Akkada Ammayi - Ikkada Abbayi', a telugu movie. He has created a commercial market for himself with his sensational hit film Toliprema. To become a top star, with just fine films is a phenomenal thing in the field. Movies were never his passion. He spent most of his youth practicing martial arts , which helped him gain the confidence and discipline which are the prime aspects of his charecter that shows very much on screen.


—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:93.97.231.220 (talkcontribs) 21:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The year has been edit-warred for a while. I checked several sources, and some list 1973 while others list 1971. I could not find specific evidence of credibility (or lack of it) to pick one vs another, so I removed the year entirely, per WP:V and WP:BLP policy. DMacks (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

User:DMacks, please refrain from making more than 3 reverts in one day. We all have different opinions, but sometimes we must draw a line on how far to pursue your opinions, and let others' have their way. (You have 3 reverts on April 17th [[1]] and your next edit this day is clearly another revert because someone added something this day [2] that was the only thing you deleted in your edit [3].) Instead, when you have already made 3 reverts in an article, you should discuss until you either reach consensus with the editors you disagree with, so that they'll revert their own edits, or until 24 hours are up and you can revert. There is no hurry. Waiting 24 hours before reverting doesn't do you any harm. An average human in North America lives for 600 000 hours. You have plenty of time to wait before reverting. Unless you didn't know you last edit had reverted someone else, this is a warning for breaking the rule, and further edit warring will result in being reported to ANI. 173.183.79.81 (talk) 00:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ball's in your court to explain why this page should not follow consensus for table data but instead include uncited analysis (against WP:V policy) and/or citedly disputed personal information (against WP:BLP policy), both previously discussed on this very talk-page as well as the larger wikiproject pages that are trying to keep these pages up to Wikipedia standards. Note that the page is currently protected (a step I support but was not involved with). DMacks (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pawan 1234.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pawan 1234.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image 1 pawan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Image 1 pawan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pawan kalyan @ T20 (10).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pawan kalyan @ T20 (10).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pawan at vishwas bro marriage.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pawan at vishwas bro marriage.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pawanpic.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pawanpic.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Power-Star-Pawan-Kalyan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Power-Star-Pawan-Kalyan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pawan-kalyan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pawan-kalyan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Political & Social Life

please enter his political life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.5.186 (talk) 07:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources

Per the WP:EL guidelines, i have moved these potential sources from the External link section. -- The Red Pen of Doom 15:57, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection

I have fully protected this article from edits for 3 days due to edit warring. The current version should not be considered the "proper" version, it is just the version when I protected it. Lalith10 has already exceeded 3RR and others have gotten close enough to justify blocks without warning. I'm choosing this in the good faith hope that you are all wise enough to hammer it out here. Work this out here on the talk page, build a consensus, then you can add/delete the material at the end of the page protection. Dennis Brown - © 11:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbar Singh 63 Days Box Office Collections Reports

File:Http://superwoods.com/cinema-images/news-images/gabbar-singh-12-07-12.jpg Gabbar Singh 63 Days Box Office Collections Reports — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaianu (talkcontribs) 04:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 21 December 2012

Pawan Kalyan is a huge star in the industry and so this article should display his picture. I request you to provide me to put a picture of him for this article. Admanoj (talk) 13:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There already is a picture. And, I think it may be a copyright violation. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 3 April 2013

In popularity heading, it was written as "Recently Indian Pop Singer Baba Sehgal composed a single on Pawan Kalyan" but it is supposed to be "Recently Indian Pop Singer Baba Sehgal composed a song on Pawan Kalyan". Here the change is that "single" to "song". Please do the change. Gabbar Singh 15:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Done I wouldn't go so far as to call this a minor edit, but it is benign. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 October 2013

There is no proof from any of the reliable sources saying that Pawan Kalyan and Renu Desai couple has been estranged and with Renu moving to her parents' house along with her children. So can you please remove this as it may cause legal issue. Crekapalli08 (talk) 23:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You're right, it was unsourced, and such claims need reliable sources. Thanks very much. --Stfg (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 8 October 2013

please change the picture of pawankalyan in this article and upload https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Powerstar_pawankalyan_at_atharintiki_daredhi_movie_audio_launch.jpg this file Saivarunn9 (talk) 10:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Not done for now: the image you've linked to is tagged as having insufficient information on its copyright status, and it may be deleted. If you can resolve this issue on Commons, you can reply here to say so and set answered=no above, and it will be looked at again. --Stfg (talk) 11:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 18 November 2013

Hello, Please add this in awards Big Telugu Entertainment Awards 2013-Best Actor male – Attarintiki Daredi

Can you please provide a reliable source for this? --    L o g  X   20:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Link for the awards !! http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/2013-11-19/Pawan-Kalyans-Athariniki-Daredi-Awards-begin-77331 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venkateshkancherla7 (talkcontribs) 20:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --    L o g  X   20:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

few picture inclusions as a part of edit

1. Adding a picture of pawan kalyan from his debut film 'AKKADA AMMAI IKKADA ABBAI' would make the EARLY CAREER column much attractive. For this I suggest the following link. http://www.google.co.in/imgres?client=firefox-a&hs=DnD&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1320&bih=718&tbm=isch&tbnid=di1IecuBHmXqsM:&imgrefurl=http://powerpawanism.blogspot.com/2013/10/akkada-ammayi-ikkada-abbayi-1996.html&docid=OjwEkzvH2-zfhM&imgurl=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Fxz7MtDoZVA/UmA9YsNqFwI/AAAAAAAAAB4/VpZTXFsx7uw/s640/s3n66d.jpg.png&w=640&h=288&ei=oPqMUuypGcaFrQfIsYGQCA&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:0,s:0,i:78&iact=rc&page=1&tbnh=150&tbnw=327&start=0&ndsp=17&tx=187&ty=65

2. Replacing the existing identification picture of pawan kalyan with one of his latest pictures from 'ATHARINTIKI DHAREDHI' makes people recognize him better. Also people will be updated with his present posture.

Thank you

Dattu 18:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done: The films are copyrighted and not "free", therefore using images (or posters, etc.) from them here would violate wikipedia's policy on non-free images. DMacks (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request, 21 November 2013

Aswath 117.244.4.140 (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. --Stfg (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

citation details

in the coloumn 2008-present of pawan kalyan career, there is a detail about the 100 days of his movie jalsa in 25 centres, you can refer to this following link as reference for his movie details of his careeer

http://www.weekendcreations.com/tollywood_talk.php?talk_id=682#.UpH9p8RplaE

Dinesh gedi (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. That appears to be a self-published source. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 3 December 2013

Hyderabad Times had announced awards for the year 2012. TIMES 2012 Awards Best Actor: Pawan Kalyan for Gabbar Singh. Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/regional/telugu/news-interviews/Hyderabad-Times-Film-Awards-2012/articleshow/26743534.cms

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2013

Please Highlet the word Power star like pawan kalyan is popularlly known as power star in the introduction

add about his new production house that started previous month

add about his popularity in web and social networks take a example for orkut site

add his relation with allu arjun relatives field Mamidisudhir (talk) 06:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done We don't highlight nicknames. The rest of your requests need to be exactly the sentences you want to add along with the references to go along with them. --NeilN talk to me 06:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2013

117.213.209.191 (talk) 08:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 57 crore (US$6.8 million)[reply]

What about it? You'll have to be specific about where and what you want changed, and provide a reliable source to verify it. DMacks (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2013

His Spouse is Anna Lezhneva, A Russian From 30 Sep 2013. Wikichaitanya (talk) 07:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --NeilN talk to me 14:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2014

1. Please add Sai Dharam Tej to relatives List. 2. Reg. 3rd further citation could be required. Rajvaida (talk) 07:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done -
1) please provide a reliably published source for the first claim.
2) it is unclear what you want done. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 6 January 2014

Please remove the name Anna Lezhneva from Pavankalyan spouses. You don't have any proof for this. When Pavan declares this then u can add her name. Till then his wife is Renu. Dont believe any false websites & Articles. Be genuine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venkateshkancherla7 (talkcontribs) 15:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We go with what reliable sources like the Times of India say. --NeilN talk to me 16:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have a complaint from the Central Feedback Page about the same thing. Apparently, there is some controversy about the marriage. I would suggest a section about the issue if this continues to be discussed in the media. --Super Goku V (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PawanKalyan revolution

  1. Pawanism MeArunkumar (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2014

please take off remaked films list in notes 103.246.65.21 (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. BryanG (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2014

its not confirmed that pawan kalyan is married for anna lezniva, its better to remove Ranginenibalu (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)  Not done it is in fact confirmed. You will need to provide reliably published sources from after 29th Dec 2013 calling the Deccan Chronicle into question before there will be any consideration of changing the content.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2014

Sumanteche (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

add a photo ...display pic of hero ..

 Done The previous picture was removed because it was a copyright violation. We only have two copyright-free pictures of Kalyan - the other one is this one - so I hope you like the one I chose. Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2014

Present Founder of Jana Sena Party Presideent Jana Sena Party Prasadreddy.c (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2014

eswar 125.22.43.14 (talk) 09:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]