Jump to content

User talk:DragonTiger23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DragonTiger23 (talk | contribs) at 12:08, 27 April 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, DragonTiger23! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kimse (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Reported

You have been reported here. Proudbolsahye (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC) (User:ProudbolsahyeUser:EtienneDolet)[reply]

Topic ban under WP:ARBMAC

− − Please see this result of a complaint at WP:Arbitration enforcement. Under the discretionary sanctions provided by the WP:ARBMAC case, you are topic banned for three months from Greece or Greeks, ancient or modern, on all pages of Wikipedia including talk. If you have any questions whether a particular article is included in the ban, please ask an admin. The ban expires on 12 October 2013. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported at User talk:EdJohnston#Dragon23: Topic ban evasion. This edit is about massacres possibly committed by Greeks. This would violate your WP:ARBMAC topic ban. If you don't have a satisfactory answer the next step is a proposal at WP:AE to block your account for violating the ban. EdJohnston (talk) 23:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

To enforce an arbitration decision,
you have been blocked from editing for 1 week. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

In addition to this block, your topic ban regarding edits concerning Greece and/or Greeks is extended to an indefinite duration. To be clear, this forbids editing or mentioning anything about the banned subjects anywhere, with the exception that you may appeal to have the ban lifted. After a reasonable period of time has passed or if you believe an error was made, you may appeal either to the sanctioning administrator (myself), to arbitration enforcement, or to the arbitration committee. I am watching this page, so if you have any questions or need clarification I will see posts you make here during your block. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of massacres in Turkey

Hello, I am writing this to you in order to inform you that some Turkish-related articles have for quite some time been hijacked by a group of editors whose only goal, it seems, is to negatively portray the Republic of Turkey, its predesseccors and its people as warmongerming murderers.

This has especially become a problem in the article of List of massacres in Turkey where they only allow information about Turks killing others, and delete all reliabely sourced information about massacres against Turks/Muslims. By doing WP:OR, discrediting sources and authors, source falsification, distortion and tag bombing.

Sources which state the number of Muslims casualties during the Greco-Turkish war is persistently being deleted.

Your help is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.178.77.28 (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a problem. Do you want to be topic banned? DragonTiger23 (talk) 16:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
78.178.77.28 You are reported for disruptive behavior. -User1

---admin hoard---

"hijacked" personally attack by 78.178.77.28. I suggest a indefinitive topic ban related on everything. -User:user1-
I agree. -User2
Hmmm, this looks like a serious problem. -Admin1
Ok then its settled 78.178.77.28 is getting a indefinitive topic ban related on everything. -Admin2-

---78.178.77.28---

@ 78.178.77.28, you have been topic banned related on everything. Now remember that this means that your topic ban is related to everything. You are not allowed to edit anything related to everything. If you have a question or make a objection then you have to inform me and I am not going to respond anyway but I have to follow procedure and write this to banned users. -Admin2

A request

Hello! I just noticed that you link to a discussion at my talk page in your userpage and implicitly (or rather explicitly) link me with your getting banned. I would ask you the courtesy of removing it. AFAIK, we have had no interaction other than this discussion, and if you actually read it, I quite clearly state that a) the topics you created are legitimate and b) that a "deserved" block comes after someone steps out of line. I was then and still am entitled to my opinion regarding your motives and methods as I saw them to be at that time. This discussion in fact expresses no more than an opinion that I still hold, based on nine years on the site: wiki-warriors who fight for "truth" as they see it, especially in topics that are nationalist minefields, always get blocked sooner or later, unless they "wisen up", temper their behaviour and take into account that their version of the "truth" is not the only one out there. At the time, I clearly pegged you in the former category. I hope that I was wrong, but I have not followed your edit history since then and don't know. I also don't know and can't judge on why you were blocked, i.e. whether because others ganged up on you or because you lost your calm and did step out of line. In any case, the discussion you link to has no relation with you getting blocked, and implicates me in a case in which I was not involved. Regards, Constantine 11:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]