Jump to content

User talk:BrothaTimothy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 26 December 2014 (→‎A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Nomination of Grammy nominations for Janet Jackson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grammy nominations for Janet Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammy nominations for Janet Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BrothaTimothy, check this IMDb site out!

Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean about not including it in the aricle, kind of like when we included Blondie: The Florence Ballard Story in her article, and no movie on that ever did get made! Also, both of these films had original casted leads who both dropped out. Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information I gave for the album was correct, otherwise I wouldn't have put it. He did have seven number ones for that album. Five in the US, two in other countries. If you want to find out for yourself, check out MJ's singles charts to find out for yourself.Stco23 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I checked to see why you changed it. I guess it's fine. The reason for that was I changed it from six to seven because somebody put six and that person could have done it because he/she saw a number one for one of the songs in another country and decided to change it as a result.Stco23 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The Moonglows.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Moonglows.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:The Moonglows.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammersoft (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enotris Johnson

I don't know whether you've seen this thread- WP:RD/E#Enotris Johnson (+ Little Richard). Anything you can add? Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't. Quite interesting. I'll put in my two cents, thanks. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Happy Holidays!
Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year!
Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hi wish to converse with you outside this forum

My name is Marg...Please contact me by email. I am new to wiki...want to do an article. Would like for YOU to mentor me. And also wish to communicate with you re your article on Harris Womack (I was a VERY close "friend" of his who loved him dearly). My email: poekneegurl@aol.com At your convenience and discretion...I leave the timing in your hands and really wish for your serious consideration in regards to mentoring/training me. Warmest regards, Marg March 9th 2014 "99.167.80.8 (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)"[reply]

You mean when it comes to how to make a Wikipedia article or editing? Sure. I'll send you a message. No prob. Cool you were friends with Harry Womack. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 16:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding re Harry Womack...Helping me...

BrothaTimothy I am not in a hurry and I know you have life outside of here. But when you can manage as far as mentoring me - let me know and I will jump at the opportunity. I will check back here every other day to see if you are able. If you will, will you give me a few dates where you may be available to communicate or when you have the time email me: poekneegurl@aol.com. I am trying to do an article on another friend of mine who is also a bass player, is still alive and I want to honor him. Atleast start on the article so others who are knowledgeable will also post. Hope you are well. Thank you for your time.

poekneegurl (Poekneegurl (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Poekneegurl (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure will, just message me here and I'll tell you how. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 19:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Motown

Hey BrothaTimothy, I agree. The other day, WikiProject The Supremes was tagged as being "inactive". I thought, "that's okay, why not just have a Motown WikiProject which would cover not just only one artist, but all of them!" This way, the Motown WP will have an ongoing lifespan since it could also deal with not only its artists (The Supremes, Four Tops, Vandellas, Miracles, Marvin Gaye, etc.), but also its record labels (Motown, Gordy, Tamla, etc.), families (Gordy, Gaye, Jackson, DeBarge, etc.), and other things of that sort (writers, producers, backups, production, companies, etc.) which are all connected to each other under the Motown umbrella. We could dissolve the Supremes WikiProject if we must, and "merge" it into WP Motown, and anything else out there that might be Motown related, and not just focus on individuals, but the entire Motown genre itself! We could have all of that under one wiki-project! The Motown WikiProject sounds like a great idea! Is that ambitious or what! Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please mentor me... LOL

Pooooollllleeeeeezzzz .LOL

Poekneegurl Poekneegurl (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The Ben (album) article, which you have edited in the past, has failed a good article reassessment. Please see Talk:Ben (album)/GA2 for concerns raised. The review is on hold for an initial seven days. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
you have a good way of expressing opinion
Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Lixxx235 (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know about edit summaries and I should've added one to my recent edit. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 06:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs by year.

This relates to first creation, not subsequent recordings. No song gets two years of creation. See the category for more details. Thanks. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of deaths in rock and roll

I'm trying to coordinate discussion on criteria for inclusion, on the article talk page. You may like to contribute. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Love Never Felt So Good

thanks for taking care of this. I was trying to fix the Russian entry by following the pattern of the others in the list. It didn't work. I didn't put it in originally, just noticed it while reading the article.--FeanorStar7 10:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Russia's chart operates differently on here than other countries, it seems. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure that you know that I have nothing to discuss ... as all I did was revert my accidental rollback click ... that you re-reverted, adding the chart back, the you reverted your revert of the rev ... well, yeah ... Steel1943 (talk) 02:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. You have new messages at Steel1943's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Steel1943 (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

invincible Michael jackson

hi I was interested in changing the intro of Michael Jackson invincible to,,,,,,,,,,"was his final album",, then on the next sentence put "it was his 10th studio album", however I have run into some opposition,,,,,,--65.8.187.36 (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it says "final album in his lifetime" (meaning his final album released while alive), I'll leave it on there. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PointersEnergy2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PointersEnergy2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Happy Holidays!
Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year!
Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

if you don't understand what is the meeing of a producer don't modify any page ok !!!

all producer must be playing keyboards ,michael was playing all of them and the violin comes from "You Rock My World" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedunbreakabletato (talkcontribs) 15:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thanks a lot (y) Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk) 17:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]