User talk:Kinu/Archive 14
Are you here because I deleted/reverted something you had contributed? Read me first, please!
|
---|
More than likely, the reason you're here is because I deleted something you had contributed. Before writing here, why not see if you can answer your question yourself?
|
Are you here to ask me to perform an administrative action (a block, page protection, deletion, etc.)? Read me first, please!
|
---|
|
IBCPirates
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, um...that message on my talk page. I responded there, and I usually don't speak to anybody on their talk pages if they left a message on my talk page but this is urgent, and besides, this is where you told me to talk. Anyway, it's a screenshot. Screenshots have been used on wikipedia. So what's the problem? --IBCPirates (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
|
A Dobos torte for you!
| ||
---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
And for your dog, too
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Muir_Trail. I thought Wikipedia wasn't a travel guide. And there is nothing about back country camping on any asseteague island links on Wikipedia, and you are claiming my information can be found on other wiki pages, you are a piece of work.....what's your problem, why can't I give other users this awesome information about what to expect at this awesome park. All u do is hide behind your generic copy and paste protocols, you give no real suggestions. And the way I see it people are making wiki pages about everything and for some reason you are picking on me? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by L!0NRAWR (talk • contribs) 22:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
|
71.202.1.48
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You blocked this IP in June for disruptive editing, and I've just now blocked it for a week for the same thing. Could you look quickly through contributions and then offer an opinion regarding whether it's the same person or not? Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
|
AIV Report
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hey there, saw your comment on AIV regarding 2601:6:6F00:538:10AA:EE25:452C:BFBC (talk · contribs). IPv6 IPs are possible to rangeblock. It's a little complicated to explain so I hope I can. Users who are not using mobile ISPs will usually have anywhere from a /48 or smaller ranges. Mobile ISPs can be as large as /29 from what I've seen. Blocking a range is a bit different. For example, to block a /48 range, just type in AAAA:BBBB:CCCC::/48. Another example is blocking a /64 range which would be something like AAAA:BBBB:CCCC:DDDD::/64. So like 2601:6:6F00:538:10AA:EE25:452C:BFBC would be 2601:6:6F00:538::/64 and a /64 address is usually allocated to one customer. Here's also a helpful site to determine what IP addresses are blocked for each range. Elockid (Talk) 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
|
CSD Category Question
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, I saw that you've proposed speedy deletion of a few Movie articles that this user created. He just created another one (here), and I'm having trouble remembering the correct category to file a CSD proposal of this type of article under. None of the guidelines on the Criteria for speedy deletion page (that I can see, at least) explicitly define a section to file for pages lacking the importance or significance of a film or movie. Which category is considered the proper one for this type of article? Thanks in advance :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
seeing as you like banning people can u ban the user pawak who ahs both threatened and patronized me for no reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.248.212 (talk • contribs)
|
Rangeblock
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu. I just wanted to let you know that I had to change one of your blocks here due to there being a huge number of unrelated registered users on it. —DoRD (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC) |
VERY URGENT!!!!
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi, Kinu. It's me, User:IBCPirates. Somebody sabotaged my ENTIRE account and changed my password. I didn't provide an email address, so, what am I going to do??????? --CaptainElizabethSwann (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I could use your feeback, please. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Zipmagic spammer is back
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, Kinu. Recently you've semi-protected Microsoft Surface-series articles from the notorious Zipmagic spammer sockpuppeter. At the 13th of the September protection has expired. No wonder he's back to Wikipedia to promote his crapware. Protection you did really worked. Please extend it at least to 3 months more.
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there, a group of specialists have been working to update the Ultrapure water article and I've been helping them with solving some of the issues within the article. I've cleaned up the section headers and helped them add in more inline citations. However, those issues still exist. Would you be able to help clarify some of the comments and let us know how we can remedy the problems that still exist? Also, with regards to the comment about "excessive amount of intricate detail," how can this issue be solved? The authors feel like their contributions add good information to the topic, even if parts of the article are fairly detailed. Thank you for your help! Ks3212 (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi, as you blocked this user previously, they have returned with the same edit warring as previously. 86.189.5.13 (talk) 12:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
|
You deleted my company page and listing there was no advertising.
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, You deleted my Indie Game Company Wikipedia page and game page Phantasy Quest, as well as my listing on the List_of_indie_game_developers. I created those pages because I am a legitimate Indie Game Studio in Boise, Idaho. I wanted to provide information about the company and the game information as do a lot of other Indie Game Developers and before I got a chance to get to work and start developing the page more it gets deleted. I am not a spammer, or someone who is advertising with Wikipedia. I am just trying to provide information about my company and the games we create. Can you please revert these changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monydragon (talk • contribs) 04:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Vandalism accounts
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Do you think that the accounts you're blocking right now could be related? I filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anonbae earlier. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
|
October 2014
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You left "Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Please do not create unnecessary talk pages that only link to the associated article. Kinu t/c 09:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)" in my talk page. Which page exactly are you talking about? -- Annonymus User 1000 (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Vagif Ibrahimov
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I noticed that you have prodded Vagif Ibrahimov Rza oglu. By now, that articles has one rather useless "reference". But more important is the existence of Vagif Ibrahimov, created after your prod-nomination. How to deal with this? The Banner talk 22:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
|
BigFuzzyKitten
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, saw your recent block of user BigFuzzyKitten. Found similar content about "TheMysteriousMrEnter" at this user's sandbox and in this diff from an IPv6 editor. I haven't researched the users, so I don't know for sure if it's all pernicious, but my guess is that it might be. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC) |
WHY
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
hello sir why did you remove 'Rajesh Kaji Shrestha' in the article shrestha ? the information is quite right.Jojolpa (talk) 00:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Page blocked - ok, but we have reviewed it and it is ready
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, I see you have blocked the "Tring Digital" page from creation. Can you unblock it? The page now exists like "Tring-Albania", but I want to be able to place a redirect, or create the "Tring Digital" page and then place the redirect on "Tring-Albania". Junuz Mustafa (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Email failure
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi, Kinu. I tried to send you an email, but I got a message saying delivery had failed. If I correctly understand the error message, it's because your email service declined the message because it said it came from my email service, but really came from the Wikipedia servers. (If that is the correct understanding, then it is going to wreak havoc with Wikipedia's email system.) Cutting the message down to a minimum, missing out much of what was in the email, I have received an email from an editor whose unblock request you declined, as it looked like a compromised account. I promised the editor confidentiality, but I think the explanation he gave is probably true. You didn't need to know that, but I just thought that you might be interested. I am not unblocking though, and won't unless we receive good reason to believe the same kind of problem won't happen again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Hayatgm
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, I was curious about this edit. What other accounts do you suspect are related to this user? I didn't find anything at SPI. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
|
tired light theory
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, I am curious why you reverted my edits on tired light page. You claim it's fringe. Tired light is a fringe theory itself so why not delete the whole page? My point is that there are different tired light theories. The theory I am referring to overcomes falsifying claims based on the Tolman surface brightness test. Therefore the claim that the Tolman surface brightness test rules out tired light theory is misleading. It does rule out specific tired light theory but not the tired light theory I mention. The reason is that old tired light theories are incomplete, and a complete tired light theory (the one I am referring to) overcomes falsifying claims based on the stretching of supernovae light curves, the luminosity distance versus redshift relationship of supernovae, and the Tolman surface brightness test. Therefore, this tired light theory has it place in this page--2A02:120B:C3FA:9030:85A5:A918:A0E4:9CF8 (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC).User:tiredlight — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:120B:C3FA:9030:85A5:A918:A0E4:9CF8 (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC) --2A02:120B:C3FA:9030:85A5:A918:A0E4:9CF8 (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Please can You unblock the "Tring Digital" page from creation?
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
This is the second time I write You. Can You please remove the block from creation of the "Tring Digital" page? Thank You! Junuz Mustafa (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Seasonal Greets!
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Davey2010
I just read WP:BATTLE and WP:AGF, and accordingly I find your message to Davey mentioning me in that context (while deliberately trying to hide it from me) as extremely upsetting. I have nothing personal against Davey (despite what he claims), I am certainly not trying to make him afraid or upset or otherwise miserable. If he tries to claim I am, I will vigorously defend myself against such lies. If anyone has been treated unfairly, it has been me by him - he reported me for being a VANDAL for crying out loud! I assume you know exactly how wrong that was (I sadly only properly realised that after the event). AGF says "If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives without clear evidence." Well, I have quite a lot of clear evidence now that Davey's lack of care in the subject area of buses/bus transport can only really be explained by him having a motive that is harmful to Wikipedia (to degrade the overall quantity and quality of its content on the subject). How else can you explain the phenomena of someone who claims to be a bus enthusiast and know a lot about buses, not having any clue how or why a list of trolleybus routes would be encyclopedic? Entire books have been written on just that subject! This is just one example. I have many more. If he had never claimed to know a lot about this subject, then yes, I could have assumed that this was just a case of amateurish but entirely innocent intent. But not any more. He clearly has a very specific idea about what Wikipedia should and should not contain on this subject, and it is quite clearly not explicitly supported by any of the rules. So, he is pushing the envelope far beyond the limits, and in some cases there's only one word to describe the things he says - pure lies. I'm sorry he's upset by the fact that I have the subject knowledge to be able to spot when he's not being truthful about certain things he says on this subject, and I'm sorry that he's upset that when he says something here breaks some rule or other, I actually take the time to check if that's true or not. But do not for a second confuse that with someone who is genuinely upset by someone stalking them or questioning their motives for no good reason. I could even go so far to say these might even be crocodile tears, since he doesn't appear to have been this sensitive over other issues where people are disagreeing with him - indeed he seems quite capable of telling people in no uncertain terms what he thinks of them. This is no shrinking violet, that's for sure. Notforlackofeffort (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have nothing to say here. Have a good day. --Kinu t/c 20:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I gather that this is standard procedure on Wikipedia in situations where replying would require the other person to admit they were wrong, or have otherwise not fully thought out their position. It seems to be the Wikipedia version of taking the 5th, albeit deployed in even more cynical ways. I was going to follow up with a specific example of how a few days ago Davey made a massively bad faith assumption about me, but I guess there's no point now. Notforlackofeffort (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Logic: if you keep saying you're right, and everyone else disagrees with you, perhaps it's not everyone else who is wrong. See you at WP:ANI. --Kinu t/c 20:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I gather that this is standard procedure on Wikipedia in situations where replying would require the other person to admit they were wrong, or have otherwise not fully thought out their position. It seems to be the Wikipedia version of taking the 5th, albeit deployed in even more cynical ways. I was going to follow up with a specific example of how a few days ago Davey made a massively bad faith assumption about me, but I guess there's no point now. Notforlackofeffort (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Zipmagic crapware promotion by vandal of MS Surface articles is here again
Hello, Kinu. Recently the term of semi-protection of Surface-series articles, which you set up this fall, is expired and Zipmagic vandal is here again resuming his activities. Please prolong the protection for an half an year more. TranslucentCloud (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know! I've semi-protected the pages for 6 months each and blocked/tagged the IPsock. --Kinu t/c 19:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- That's great, thanks a lot. TranslucentCloud (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Consideration of the removal of a flag on article: Gregor Collins
Hi, Kinu - I'm writing you because the flag that still exists on the said article was originally tagged by you. Let me say that first of all, based on my username, there's obviously no hiding the fact that it's my page (Gregor Collins), however I didn't create it and I haven't been the only one contributing to it, and if I have, I've added facts backed up by sources, written in a neutral manner. I'm not pulling any wool over anyone's eyes, nor have any interest in creating a "false" article. I just think a few things are due to be communicated: Since September 2013, the date of the flag, reliable sources and additional, validated wiki links (including the recently approved article Goodbye Promise, of which I was a well-documented large part, as well as the memoir The Accidental Caregiver, about Maria Altmann, very well documented as a bestselling book on Amazon, and a story that will be performed on stage in New York at the end of this month). All this has been provided since the date of the flag over a year ago. In regards to links: I understand many YouTube links and blogs - this type of thing - aren't worthy sources (and IMDB, to an extent, however at least this provides an "FYI cross-reference" amidst, ideally, more credible sources), and I'd be happy to remove any of them you find dubious, however if you'll notice there exists "top-shelf links" like the LA Times article about Goodbye Promise[1], and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer article about the memoir[2], as well as more "medium shelf" - yet credible - sources like Blip TV[3], Film Threat[4], Arizona Sports and Lifestyle Magazine[5], Filmmaking Stuff[6], and Cinema Editor Magazine. These are not blogs or "wordpress" sites, they are legitimate, well-sourced publications. Please also note that this YouTube link[7] shouldn't be lumped into just any old video anyone can throw up, it's from a reputable online show (Media Mayhem, TheLip.TV) hosted by writer, lawyer and journalist Allison Hope Weiner (sister of Matthew Weiner, about Maria Altmann, The Accidental Caregiver, and its pending production). Please also note that Gregor Collins has been linked to many other approved Wikipedia articles (including Fred Roos, Maria Altmann, Woman in Gold, and Adele Bloch-Bauer I, and these are all regarding his book The Accidental Caregiver, which should, itself, be a worthy candidate for an article in the next few weeks). If for some reason what I'm writing you today still lacks credibility, or is still flag-worthy, I'd love to know more specifically what you need in order to have it flag-less. I do have a great deal of respect for the fact that you are all volunteers. Thanks for your time, and happy new year. Gregorcollins (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- ^ http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/01/entertainment/la-et-goodbye-promise-capsule-20120601
- ^ http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/blogcritics/article/Book-Review-The-Accidental-Caregiver-by-Gregor-3834960.php
- ^ http://blip.tv/talkingabout/talking-about-gregor-collins-4247735
- ^ http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/53857/
- ^ http://azsal.com/book-review/the-accidental-best-seller-the-accidental-caregiver/
- ^ http://www.filmmakingstuff.com/without-hollywood-agents/
- ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el7BCaVAup8