George Galloway is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and George Galloway has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
George Galloway is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Galloway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This issue has been discussed repeatedly on this talk page. As Galloway has denied a Muslim conversion, and has said his religious views are a private matter, it is not possible to add anything on the issue to the article. Philip Cross (talk) 16:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, not quite actually. Galloway did not deny having converted to Islam or being a Moslem. What he denied was that the specific instance referred to by Jemima Khan was an Islamic conversion ceremony. Not the same thing at all.
Firstly, Muslim. Secondly I have a direct quotation from his own lips that can be place if needed. In an interview with London Real - an online podcast - when asked about people questioning him, and it being a loaded question about being a Muslim... George Galloway: "It is, its put as kind of a accusation, um, and its raised about Islam that it could not be raised about other Religions. If I were quote unquote 'suspected' of being a Jew, nobody could run around after me with a microphone saying are you are Jew, are you A Jew?" Interviewer:"They couldn't ask you that question could they, right." George Galloway: "They couldn't no. Um, but they do it in relation to Islam because I am very close to the Muslim population, I am a champion of the Palestinian cause, most of whom are Muslims but by no means all. I just always give the same answer; that I believe in God; I have always believe in God; I try to live my live, not always successfully, in accordance with the teachings of God; er which are revealed of course in all 3 of the monotheistic faiths, um and err that's really all you really need to know, I say, err about my Religion." Source for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPQQxJmdb-U, 33 minutes 48 seconds in. If the assumption is granted that "3 of the monotheistic faiths" refers to the Abrahamic faiths, then Muslims would consider him a Muslim, but other faiths... not a clue. I'd say it would be fair to place the shortened quotation directly revering to his faith, with the er's removed: "I try to live my live, not always successfully, in accordance with the teachings of God; which are revealed of course in all 3 of the monotheistic faiths. That's really all you really need to know, I say, about my Religion." Maybe ellipsis the "I say" as well? 92.26.147.61 (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How could you object to putting a quote from Galloway into the article? The word "suspected" used in this context does not make it inconclusive, Galloway was illustrating a larger point. Nye, 15:02 23rd March 2015
It is a pretty obscure primary source in which Galloway is being purely speculative. It cannot be used as any kind of confirmation that he is a Muslim, without presenting an editor's own interpretation. This would count as original research. Whether or not Galloway has converted to Islam is a very minor issue. As far as improving the article is concerned, this is frankly irrelevant at present. The really significant issue concerns some of Galloway's statements which might be thought to imply sympathy or support for jihadist acts, his "martyrs" comments in August 2005, for example. See the section currently headed "Iraq after Saddam Hussein (2003–06)". Philip Cross (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A primary source on the subject of the person's religion is not only acceptable. But, by WP principles, it is preferred. A quote would not be OR, as it would not constitute an interpretation. As to whether or not he has converted to Islam is a "minor" issue -- in the absence of an RS on that point, that would be editor POV speaking. It certainly has attracted much RS coverage. Any sympathy or support for jihadist acts would also, if RS-covered, be notable. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Red herring regarding George Galloway's 1994
It is superfluous and almost disingenuous to claim that there is an "issue of the precise context of his statement to Saddam" on the grounds of claims by Galloway and his supporters that he was simply addressing the Iraqi people and not Saddam Hussein personally.
The wording of his speech clearly indicates that he was addressing Saddam personally, beginning his speech "Your Excellency, Mr. President". and repeatedly using the title "Sir".
JD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.149 (talk) 01:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and have removed the sentence. Since the speech was delivered in English, and Galloway does not himself speak Arabic, the comments by Anasal-Tikriti do not make sense. If they were not so well sourced, I would be tempted to delete them. The full text of Galloway's speech in Morley's book also makes the 'speaking for the Iraqi people' defence difficult to sustain. As editors though, we are obliged to cover all significantly sourced points of view and, at present ,Anasal-Tikriti comments are the only ones defending Galloway which are not in the words of the politician himself. Philip Cross (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Despite my comments from nearly 3 months ago, I have decided to remove the Anasal-Tikriti passage as most of it replicates Galloway's own argument. The version provided to Saddam Hussein by his interpreters was outside Galloway's control. Philip Cross (talk) 11:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Legal case involving Galloway (2012–14)
In this edit I have removed a passage detailing the court case involving Galloway's former assistant in Bradford, Aisha Ali Khan, and her husband, which led to them both receiving criminal convictions. While this incident initially involved Galloway directly, his claim of organised "dirty tricks" when the story first broke for example, he seems more distant in the narrative as it progresses.
The passage did not seem substantial enough to stand on its own as a separate article, being mainly News. The other items on WikNews about Galloway do not include any which evolved over a period of time, so the option of creating an article there also seemed untenable. Deletion seemed to be the best option.
I have amended the mention Ali Khan receives in the Respect Party article to include the result of the court case. She is mentioned in connection with the five Respect councillors who resigned from the party having been accused by Galloway of working with her among other reasons. It seems wrong on NPOV grounds in that article not to acknowledge that, on this occasion, Galloway's allegations concerning Ali Khan were not entirely without foundation. Philip Cross (talk) 12:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
“Ferocious assault" on the Ba'ath Party in the late 1980s
In the subsection ‘Member of Parliament for a Glasgow seat’ it is claimed: ‘According to journalist David Aaronovitch, Hansard in the late 1980s, records Galloway delivering "a ferocious assault" on the Ba'ath Party.’ Maybe it’s my research skills (or lack of….) but I can’t find Galloway’s remarks in Hansard’s records for the 1980s – if they’re worthy of note can we track down the official source? JezGrove (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be a mistake made by Aaronovitch. Speeches by Galloway in Hansard about Iraq or Saddam Hussein do not pre-date the first Gulf War. Reference to the Ba'ath (or Baath) Party were not made by Galloway either. I have modified the passages accordingly. Philip Cross (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ex-politician
As George Galloway does not currently hold any political office, and given the previously tenuous claim that he had to influencing British politics even while a Member of Parliament, would it be more accurate to refer to Galloway as an ex-politician, and currently more of a media personality? His current appearances in the news seem to be limited to provocative comments and personal spats rather than genuine impact on political thought or debate. Moreover, his political positions are not considered relevant in today's political climate, in my opinion. U65945 (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not clear to me that an out-of-work politician isn't a politician. George hasn't retired from politics. He announced that he would stand in the election for London Mayor in 2016 if he lost his seat. He is to mount a legal challenge to his recent loss, as well, it has been reported. If a basketball player is an unsigned free agent, we don't call them a former basketball player. So ... seems to me that for the moment, especially absent RS coverage of his as an ex-politician, it would not be appropriate. We can of course certainly call him an "ex-MP." --Epeefleche (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you present an opinion explaining why you do not like George Galloway, it is unlikely to gain support. TFD (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps "in my opinion" was the wrong phrase to use. I meant to say that "it seems apparent" that his political views are no-longer considered relevant in news sources in the UK. For example, his current exposure in the news concerns an ebola scare and previous hate speech charges, not contribution to policy etc. Epeefleche: I see your distinction between an out-of-work politician and an ex-politician, thanks. When is it generally accepted as appropriate to refer to someone as an ex-politician? U65945 (talk) 08:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, The Four Deuces, I'm not sure that my comment expressed any form of obvious distaste for Galloway. I'm generally indifferent to him, but am concerned that the opening paragraph gives a misleading impression of his current impact on British politics. U65945 (talk) 08:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good point! Purely out of interest, when would it become appropriate to define figures such as Galloway as "ex-politicians", and the like. U65945 (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]