Jump to content

Talk:Twitter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.104.132.1 (talk) at 17:56, 30 May 2015 (→‎What is the point?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleTwitter has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 25, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 14, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 19, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
September 1, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 13, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Revisions suggested 12/10/13

Please copy record tweet information from “Growth” section to the “Record Tweets” section. The heading “Record Tweets” only has two record tweets under it, and would be improved by adding more record tweets from the “Growth” section.

The first paragraph of the “Issues and Controversies” section should be altered. Most of the paragraph leads the reader to assume that Twitter has played a large role in the Arab Spring. Then the last sentence discredits that line of thought by stating only a small fraction of the population of Arab Spring countries are active on Twitter. Please revise to state a debate exists as to the size of the role Twitter has had in these revolutions. Twitter revolutions should possibly have its own heading, where this debate can be summarized.

The following text should be included to introduce the Arab Spring section of the first paragraph of “Issues and Controversies”. In 2009, the Western world projected Twitter onto the green revolution in Iran. Twitter did play a role in the uprising, but not to the extent the Western media said it did. An extreme minority of Iranians used Twitter at that point in time. Twitter did help publicize the events of the green revolution in an otherwise secretive and closed country, but Twitter did not drive the masses into the streets of Tehran. source: http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/morozovch1.pdf

Twitter and this article are awful. Where's the criticism and controversy section?

You were than happy to include one for FaceBook and MySpace, but nothing for this godawful social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.207.205 (talk) 05:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Don't expect to see it any time soon, though. Thatguytestw 03:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguytestw (talk • contribs)

Sensor Networks on Twitter

I am interested in sensor networks being run through Twitter. I've not been able to find out much about this type of automation, in which sensors from the field send data out via Twitter to followers. The most famous example is @BeijingAir, but I think there must be others and would like to know about these.

If you would be willing to go out and find multiple reliable sources supporting these claims and their relevancy, I (and I'd assume other users) would be willing to add the content to the page. I do not know enough on the subject but if you can provide sources, we can collectively add this information. Hope this helps! Meatsgains (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what IS twitter?

I have been trying to find the answer to this question for year, but nobody will give a real answer.

The article starts:

"Twitter is an online social networking service that enables users to send and read short 140-character messages called "tweets"."

This does not come anywhere near answering the question.

I can already "send and read short 140-character messages" and I suppose I could call them "tweets" if I wanted to.

So somebody, PLEASE answer the question:

Exactly what IS twitter? ---Dagme (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How would these 140 character messages that you can already send be read by many? If you're just sending a SMS/Text, then it's only readable by the list of people you send it to, and it's private. Nobody else gets to see it. Twitter is essentially a one-to-many relationship. With Twitter, their platform allws you to broadcast your tweets to everyone who chooses to listen (follows you). By using hashtags, you get to broadcast beyond your following audience even, and are broadcasting to all who follow the hashtag. On the receiving side, you choose who to follow and which hashtags you're interested in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.180.142 (talk) 21:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a social network, even if some folks use it as one. It's a means of broadcasting messages on the web. All you do is public, so it's publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.125.253.87 (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2015

I want to add in information regarding Twitters new built in video service. Wikiguy349 (talk) 06:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been in the news [1] but the service has not been launched yet, so there is an element of WP:CRYSTAL. It would be best to wait until the service is launched.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valid banners & possible reassessment?

I have seen some cleanup banners around the page that were planted recently. I will try and look into seeing if these are still valid, and possibly create a reassessment, but considering that I don't really have the time to devote my entire day to the issue, I thought I'd tell other Wikipedians about it. Maybe a couple people could come here and we could work out the issue? I don't know. I'm going to work on it though. Thatguytestw 00:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguytestw (talk • contribs)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2015

Change number of employees to 3600. Source: https://about.twitter.com/company Fluffy379 (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done and Thank you --Chamith (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Change picture

Perhaps a timeline picture would be more useful than the log in?--88.104.132.120 (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this--88.104.133.87 (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is Twitter's timeline, but I'm not sure if it works well as a thumbnail for the infobox.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you should try it--88.104.133.87 (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the infobox image requires WP:CONSENSUS, as it is not a good idea to go back and forth with different images. Other views on changing the infobox image are welcome.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How do we get consensus then?--88.104.138.119 (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment, no-one else has chimed in with a request to change the picture. The standard practice is to give a screenshot of the home page of a website in the infobox, such as at Facebook or YouTube. The screenshot of Twitter's home page isn't all that exciting, but I'm not sure that the timeline works better.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. I agree with the YouTube one as is still indicative of the use of the website, but I've asked what they think about the Facebook one now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.138.119 (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC) * Sorry I forgot to sign.--88.104.138.119 (talk) 13:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Might be difficult to get a consensus on changing the photo, however the current one is most widely recognized as Twitter. TrainsOnTime (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How would we get consensus?--88.104.132.1 (talk) 12:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Follow

I think that this would benefit from a description of what it means to "follow" on Twitter. And that Follow (disambiguation) would benefit from a line pointing to that description. Tx. --Epeefleche (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Noah Glass

Minimal notability outside of involvement with Twitter §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point?

The article says:

"Twitter is an online social networking service that enables users to send and read short 140-character messages called "tweets"."

I don't know much about Twitter, but I knew that. My question is: I understand that images can be sent on twitter. Clearly any reasonable image would have a far larger file size than a 140 character text file. So, my question is: What is the point? ---Dagme (talk) 01:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can send images on Twitter

This is confusing.Please clarify--88.104.132.1 (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Twitter&oldid=664736005"