Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:NawlinWiki

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by YSB (talk | contribs) at 06:09, 18 June 2015 (→‎Greg Rolen Biographical Article Deletion Query). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

NawlinWiki

Dear nawlin Wiki,

As u said that I shouldn't use Wiki to publicize my self and my books. Then, can u pls suggest me the source or any reasoning for the following pages:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durjoy_Datta 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_It's_Not_Forever 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chetan_Bhagat 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_3_Mistakes_of_My_Life

I can give many examples like this - ten twenty or more.. These pages also based on same criteria. I followed the same pattern these pages used. Please suggest or justify your words.as these pages also include website from where consumer can buy the books... Waiting for ur reply...

Deepanshu Saini 18:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

EQ TEchnologic

I cannot believe you deleted the page again. cant you see the significance of company.i have cited all the important references and still you deleted it like a MAD man. dont you have any job apart from deleting the pages. and this is ridiculous, the article was created for people who lives in India and Pune. they know the significance of the article. who are you to judge it sitting far away with no idea what the article is about. The company page was no way a promotional activity. it helped students to get to know about the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihar.suryawanshi (talk • contribs) 09:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's exactly because we might not know about a company in a faraway country that we rely on verifiable, independent sources, see WP:V, that show that a company is notable per our standards, see WP:CORP. The article that I deleted did not indicate how this company was notable per WP:CORP, and did not cite any sources other than the company's own website. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

East Wing Airlines

I recently got to know from somewhere that this article was deleted. May I know why you deleted it as a "Hoax"? There is existence of "East Wing Airlines"[1][2], they are established in Kazakhstan. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(tpw) OZ, did you notice that the founding date of the airline was stated as "2030"? Did you notice that the airline was supposedly based in Scotland, not Kazakhstan? You rushed your review and mistakenly passed on an obvious hoax. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It might be possible that information was misleading, but that could be corrected and the title of this article had to be checked. I remember a deletion of another article,[3] which would later pass AfD too. If there is a hoax, at least the title should be checked. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it should have been checked. By the reviewer, i.e. you. The article wasn't misleading, it was rubbish - the page was not at all related to the airline based in Kazakhstan, therefore, a hoax. If you had done even a cursory check of what was there, you would have realized that. As for the other article you mention above, it was you who incorrectly marked it for deletion. Stop trying to blame your failings on other editors. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where did I blamed? I only said that it had to be first checked. Now someone wanted this article to be deleted as hoax, because one editor had filled the article with fake information. All it required was, that they had to be removed. Recently there were attempts to delete an old article[4] as hoax, few even agreed. But here, the title needed to be changed. Reason can be different, but it should be thoroughly checked before deletion. That's what I am saying. I cited that above example because it was one of the example from which I had learned. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You said that checks should have been done, therefore shifting the burden and blame to someone else. But again, it is you who should have checked the article for veracity and accuracy before passing it through review. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NawlinWiki, I apologize - I didn't intend for this to go round-and-round on your page like this, though I suppose I should have foreseen it. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No you made some nice points. I had this article on my watchlist, I just thought that I would act towards it, but later. Now it was mentioned elsewhere so I just thought of notifying NawlinWiki about it asap. I have just created East Wing (Kazakhstan) too. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • No problem. The East Wing article that I deleted was the product of a clever serial hoaxer, User:John Daker, who has attempted to post false information on Wikipedia in many ways. He gave himself away this time by attempting to add to the East Wing article a reference to one of his previous hoaxes. So it's not surprising that he used the name of a real (but obscure) airline to post a hoax article. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
May I have East Wing Airlines as a redirect to East Wing (Kazakhstan)? This title is circulated.[5] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's time to try unprotecting Talk:VBulletin

I started a thread recently [6] where I felt I was hearing some support for the idea of not having semi-protected talk pages; the number in this category is down from 86 to 68 now. You semi-protected Talk:VBulletin as a spambot target after four incidents in 2012. I think it should be time to try unprotecting it and see if the bot is really still out there... I sure hope not! Wnt (talk) 23:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. So far so good... at least the spambot hasn't been patiently probing the page all this time. :) Wnt (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect Lord Haw-Haw

Lede needs fixing. Simply, this edit needs to be corrected: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lord_Haw-Haw&oldid=615606365 67.187.5.157 (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with inventing?

What is wrong with inventing a new word and inviting others to use it, too? I use Piggywinkle a lot. --User:Writer freak

Nicknames and hobbies?

new to wikipedia not even sure if this is the right place to add to your page... anyways in regards to your comments: "Sky" is not just a friendly nickname for Schuyler, clients, and journalists refer to him by this. Schuyler is just his full, first name. DId not know hobbies were promotional, Sky's hobby with motorcycles has help fostered deals with clients like Morgan Freeman and UTV. Let me know. Callied (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it--if i fix the language used to present the content I already have, will this page be okay? Thanks! Callied (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dru Yoga Locked Article

YOU ARE HELPING LIFE FOUNDATION DRU YOGA EMPLOYEE VANDALS HIDING BEHIND MANY WIKIPEDIA USERNAMES INTERFERING WITH UNBIASED EDITING OF ARTICLE BY HIDING ALLEGED CHILD ABUSE BY DR. MANSUKH PATEL AND ARREST BY POLICE FOR ASSAULTING A WOMAN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FemkeHanraets (talk • contribs) 19:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

READ THE HIDDEN ARTICLES PROPERLY AND SEE WHY THEY ARE HIDING MUCH OF THE REFLIST. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FemkeHanraets (talk • contribs) 19:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets blocked. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision deletion

Hi NawlinWiki!

Thanks for revision-deleting some problematic content at Dru yoga. As a reminder, the revision deletion summaries under the category FOR USE BY OVERSIGHERS ONLY, when suppressing privacy and defamation should only be used when content is suppressed, not when administrative revision deletion is applied. See Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight for more information. LFaraone 21:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unbabel

Hi NawlinWiki -- Just curious if the page for Unbabel could be edited to conform to Wikipedia's guidelines rather than deleted. I have citations from other sources but had not finished creating the page (I was using the new_page tag, I think) prior to its being deleted. Drakeballew (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Milani Plumbing

Hi NawlinWiki,

I apologize for saving my article to public. I meant to save it as a draft, and I clearly did not. I'll make sure to remedy that next time. I am interested to know your specific thoughts on the deletion of the article. After checking the notability guidelines, I felt that this did meet them considering the sources.

Have a good day,

TheSereneTheif (talk) 20:27, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Additionally, if it would make the company more notable, it has won at least 20 awards in the local area for best business. I chose not to include it due to the fact that I thought it may be promotional in nature. Thanks for your time. TheSereneTheif (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be of bother

Hello, NawlinWiki, this is indef-blocked User:Doughnuthead speaking. I firmly believe I can finally be of positive use to Wikipedia, and I no longer feel the need to gain attention through malicious editing. I'd actually all but forgotten about all the nonsense i had caused in the previous years until i saw a funny picture online of a guy with a swollen head, which reminded me of my username. But more to the point, i realised that my ability to edit the talk page was barred. After taking a look at previous edits, i realised i was being a bit of a tube. You were right to take that ability away. So just a heads up that i can only edit on anon as this account is obviously still suspended. In terms of getting unblocked, i haven't made a single edit to Wikipedia in almost 3 years, and during this time i have matured enough to the point that i look back at what i was getting up to and think 'Oh god! Who was i even trying to impress?!' In terms of where i aim to get involved in on the website, I still hold a strong interest in football (soccer) related articles, along with hip-hop and old school rock related articles- hence my music taste. As it has been so long since I bothered to use the editing facility, I'll need re-shown how to work various parts of the site or whatever it's called. I only remembered how to request unblock by clicking on the 'edit' tab and noticing one of my old templates! Furthermore, I don't intend to be an overly active user on the site, as I begin my university course in September much of my time will be dedicated towards my studies, and so I intend to see Wikipedia as a hobby to input my thoughts and research every now and then. Finally, thank you very much for reading my request - I appreciate the time taken to do so and I apologise for my past behaviour. I was just a stupid kid (it lasted from age 12-15 if I recall!) and I hope to hear from you as soon as possible--89.241.208.230 (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finding quite a bit of people listed as possibly living who are dead on other wikis

Figured I mention this to you-yeah since the bot has been broken for a while. (I'm adding them to the talk page also!) Wgolf (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of M&M Striping and Powerwashing

The Wikipedia page M&M Striping and Powerwashing was in no way promotional. Information--as I'm certain Wikipedia administrators know--is essential to the human condition. Depriving users of information on M&M Striping and Powerwashing is ridiculous, especially when one considers that M&M Striping and Powerwashing's page looks awfully similar to other companies' pages like Public Storage. No number or address to our company was included. No "call us now" was included. All that was included was information pertinent to the lives of Wikipedia users.

Recognizing that you are a Wikipedia administrator, I would be appalled to think that you are simply deleting pages of smaller companies that aren't national icons. Smaller companies are important to our economy; they employ half of our workforce. I have no evidence that you or any other administrators have been using these tactics, but it is not a far stretch to assume so.

Past print encyclopedias never would have had pages for companies like M&M Striping and Powerwashing; nonetheless, Wikipedia is revolutionary not traditionalist.

Cesarmart929 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Cesarmart929: I suggest you read about the notability criteria for companies. From my brief search, it appears that company doesn't meet these criteria, and therefore could be deleted under WP:A7 for lack of notability. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that M&M Striping and Powerwashing may not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements; however, I do not understand why Wikipedia would deny "non-notable" companies a chance to provide information to their customers, however few there may be. Cesarmart929 (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cesarmart929: Because Wikipedia is not a place to promote a business, see WP:NOTADVERTISING. If every company was allowed to have a page, then Wikipedia would have no encyclopedic value, as it would just be a directory of companies. The notability standards are deliberately to maintain the quality of the encyclopedia, so not every company/musician/person can make a page about their obscure company. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A multi-million dollar enterprise, M&M Striping and Powerwashing, although not as notable as Fortune 500 companies, is not obscure. With factuality and proper organization, Wikipedia should not have a problem with adding the pages of smaller companies. Our page contained no factual errors or obscurity. Screening notability is not the way to maintain Wikipedia's value; screening factuality to let smaller companies add Wikipedia pages would add value to this online encyclopedia. Cesarmart929 (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't necessarily the problem, it was deleted as unambiguous advertising. All Wikipedia articles must be neutral in tone, see WP:NPOV, and this wasn't. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Schewe

Hi NawlinWiki, can you get my page Christopher Schewe out of the deletion log so I can fix and edit it so it can be properly published without being speedily deleted and can you help me if you can. User talk:Shoenice1969 Shoenice1969 (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi. I am onto the job of patrolling new pages. Don't we have any bots or tools to auto-patrol pages? Thanks PawanAhuja (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC) PawanAhuja (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to my recent changes on the Government of Romania page: it is not a personal opinion, the current Prime Minister of Romania, victor ponta, has been accused of forgery and in the past of other common crimes. He is in fact a petty criminal, and his page is protected - to hide such fact. I need to spread the word. I will not modify the page again, but need. to. let. people. know. Aflabetagamateta (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

best way to create page for the organisation i m working

Can you please guide me through this Nawlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateen.salim (talk • contribs) 06:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like Drone Razors Through Flesh Sphere (LDRTFS)

I write you about: 16:55, 9 June 2015 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted page Like Drone Razors Through Flesh Sphere (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events))

I understand the delection, but please read. LDRTFS is a uncomercial outfit. An elusive band without website, contact address, line-up... The only proof of their exisitence are their releases and their concerts. I assist to one of this events in a small chapel in Riga, Latvia.

However, this band is important for the avant-garde modern music history.

(i) Importance: LDRTFS is probably the first European band in play Drone Metal style. Releasing since 1997 more than thirty records.

Only the USA band Earth and the Japanese band Boris, released something similar before, so LDRTFS is a pioneer of a music style; at the same era Sunn O))) was doing something similar in the United States.

(ii) I know that provided links are not enough maybe; but there is no more info on the net, simply like that. Even I add some links from wikipedia itself.

All my info comes from analog sources. For this reasons I can not add links. My sources are: a) 'Reacciones Negativas' music magazine #4. Interview with LDRTFS. There is not a digital version of this magazine, so I can not add a link.

b) 'Morbid Visions' fanzine #5. Interview to Teitanblood. There is not a digital version of this magazine, so I can not add a link.

c)Layouts of the LDRTFS's releases. There is not a digital version of this releases, so I can not add a link.

(iii) The few links I provided are proving: a) Their existence. b) Their discography. c) Their importance.

(iiii) There is only one link I do not add before, a bandcamp link: https://ldrtfs.bandcamp.com This link do not add relevant info about the band, only some albums streaming and a few reviews; but is another proof of existence and importance that I can add if my submission is approved.

GP Putnam (talk) 09:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I understand your concerns. The issue for us is that because we don't want to be applying our opinions to what might be musically noteworthy, we rely on verifiable independent sources, see WP:V, to establish that. The fact that we can't verify any of your sources, combined with this being "An elusive band without website, contact address, line-up...", makes me think that the band can't satisfy our criteria for inclusion, see WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ELEQT

Hi NawlinWiki. I see that you deleted our ELEQT Wiki entry due to unambiguous advertising. I let our content team re-write the text and I'm hoping that it will be accepted this time.

Our network has millions of members around the world and we are not looking to advertise our services. We just want a Wiki page that has information regarding our merger and launch, so that people can easily find this data.

The revised text is below. Can I go ahead and create a new entry with this text, or will it be deleted again?

"ELEQT is a company that was founded as a result of the merger between invitation-only social network Elysiants Inc. and Qubers, the social networking business of the Quintessentially Group, creating an exclusive lifestyle discovery network with members from targeted urban locations all over the world.

ELEQT is an invitation-only social networking site focused exclusively on high net worth individuals. It is the company’s mission to establish a trusted lifestyle network that has the power to engage and influence its members not only online, but also in the real world.

Elysiants Inc. was founded in August 2007 by Ruud Smeets and Ronald de la Fuente-Saez. In February 2013, Quintessentially Group’s Qube and Elysiants Inc. announced their partnership to launch ELEQT (www.eleqt.com).

On October 1st, 2014, ELEQT was acquired by EFactor Group Corp (OTCQB: EFCT), owners of a group of entrepreneur-focused service companies and EFactor.com, a social network providing content and resources for entrepreneurs worldwide. EFactor.com has 1.3 million members in 222 territories across 240 industries. It is headquartered in San Francisco and listed on the OTC exchange (OTCQB: EFCT).

Regional offices are located in Amsterdam, Curaçao, Dubai, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, New York, São Paulo, San Francisco and Santiago de Chile."

David Daviddovale (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We've adjusted the text. Will the following be allowed?

ELEQT was founded as a result of the merger between invitation-only social network Elysiants Inc. and Qube, the social networking business of the Quintessentially Group.

--- 2012 launch --- Ruud Smeets and Ronald de la Fuente-Saez founded Elysiants in 2007. In February 2012, Elysiants Inc. and Qube announced their partnership to launch ELEQT (www.eleqt.com). Since then, ELEQT has been launched in the following cities: London, Hong Kong, São Paulo, Dubai, Santiago de Chile, Singapore, New York, Amsterdam, Los Angeles, Beijing, Boston and Mexico.

--- EFactor Group acquisition --- ELEQT was acquired by EFactor Group Corp (OTCQB: EFCT), owners of a group of entrepreneur-focused service companies and EFactor.com (www.efactor.com), on October 1st 2014. EFactor.com is headquartered in San Francisco and listed on the OTC exchange (OTCQB: EFCT).

ELEQT's regional offices are currently located in Amsterdam, Curaçao, Dubai, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, New York, São Paulo, San Francisco and Santiago de Chile.

Daviddovale (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NawlinWiki

20:46, 10 June 2015 NawlinWiki deleted page Mark Gura (A7: No credible indication...) Dear NawlinWiki, you deleted the above named article today about Gura, a notable personality that should be listed in wikipedia. Gura conducts hundreds of seminars, has appeared on radio and TV and is helping to shape a new genre, that of Secular Buddhism. What information do you need me to include so that this article is not deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skierewicz (talk • contribs) 21:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect Lord Haw-Haw

Lede needs fixing. Simply, this edit needs to be corrected: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lord_Haw-Haw&oldid=615606365 67.187.5.157 (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.5.157 (talk)

Community Change, inc.

How does the Community Change, inc. article not demonstrate importance? how can it be made to demonstrate importance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by C0l3rs (talk • contribs) 15:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community Change, inc.

Is it never acceptable to cite an organizations own website? Because that happens on virtually every article about organizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C0l3rs (talk • contribs) 15:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It can't be the principal source of information about the organization. External reporting is what tells us that an organization is notable. Per WP:V, "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as: the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources." Please do read WP:V -- it will answer a lot of your questions. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Cotton (geneticist)

Hey NawlinWiki. You previously deleted Richard Cotton (geneticist) for unambiguous copyright infringement. The original source of the text has just released it under the CC0 zero, so I've recreated the page. Hope this is ok. Tdsmith84 (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Netatmo removed

Hey !

You actualy removed a Netatmo page, i've just made, while saying it was "Spam" or "EXCLUSIVELY promotional"...

I actualy spend time on it, and i don't understand why it is considered as spam.... I've read the list of things for the "Speed deletion" and the article is not concerned.....

If some informations were "promotional" (and i don't know which ?!) just tell me/modify them instead of removing every thing, cause it is not "exclusively promotional"...

I'm actualy going to wait a bit... but i think i'm going to post it again soon....

Thanks a lot for responding....

Gpotter2 (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New to wikipedia

New to wikipedia
Hi there, I am struggling to use Wikipedia as I am new and didn't know how else to contact you. I think what you are doing for Wikipedia is great except for what you just did to me. You just deleted my page and accused me of lying. I have most certainly not lied and that article took me all night to create and I am extremely unhappy. Brandon Groves is my cousin so I think I should know!! Very rude Footymad69 (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me recover the Marianne Fassler page to improve it and make it more credible? Newageadam (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deepanshu Saini

Dear Nawlin Wiki,

Well, This is the first time, I created the page and it has been deleted by you. I read your whole message. But, I didn't found anything promoting product in my page. Two pages were about the book (Fiction Novel) and I checked the formatting of the pages from other indian fiction novels books and mine are similar to them. Another page was about author deepanshu saini. In that page also, there was nothing like promoting. I didn't even post any online portal to buy books. There were just links of social media to contact the author. May u please suggest me what should I do, as such u will not delete the page in future. If you want to omit any line or para, then we can discuss over that. A\Waiting for ur reply.. Please...


Regards, Deepanshu Saini 17:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


Dear nawlin Wiki,

As u said that I shouldn't use Wiki to publicize my self and my books. Then, can u pls suggest me the source or any reasoning for the following pages:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durjoy_Datta 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_It's_Not_Forever 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chetan_Bhagat 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_3_Mistakes_of_My_Life

I can give many examples like this - ten twenty or more.. These pages also based on same criteria. I followed the same pattern these pages used. Please suggest or justify your words.as these pages also include website from where consumer can buy the books... Waiting for ur reply...

Deepanshu Saini 18:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Jackie Cruz

  • Just so you know, I re-created this article (although it is still under construction). Because it was deleted back in 2007, I doubt that it was even about the same person, but now the article is about a notable actress. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Rolen Biographical Article Deletion Query

Hello
I suppose you speedily deleted the article that I posted. I wrote the article with reference to other similar articles. I received a notification that the article needs more citations. But I have seen many articles with much less content and references. Would you Please elaborate the reason it has been taken down.
Thanks
YSB (talk • contribs) 04:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_98&oldid=667451170"