Jump to content

User talk:Trincres17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Trincres17 (talk | contribs) at 11:15, 30 September 2015 (→Assistance with your COI issue). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!Template:Z129

Krai album

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Krai album, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.whatrecords.co.uk/items/60779.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krai album

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krai album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.whatrecords.co.uk/items/60779.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO   A&E⇑ 14:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nothankyou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alternative and Classical
Olga Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alternative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God damn band

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on God damn band, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God Damn (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on God Damn (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte 12:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read any of my answers to your questions on my talk page? I have deleted the page again. Please read and understand the things I linked to before you ask about this, and do not create the page again. —Kusma (t·c) 11:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the kind message :) Would be kind enough to explain exactly why, in simple terms, I am unable to create this page for God Damn? As I have previously created very similar pages from other artists, and they have been fine. Sorry, I am struggling to understand and navigate the Wikipedia jargon. Thanks a lot!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited God Damn (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy rock and Garage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should check out Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and follow the instructions there. —Kusma (t·c) 12:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wild Palms (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wild Palms (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://allevents.in/events/popular-reading-w-wild-palms-younghusband-ctm-djs/290483287640304. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fylbecatulous talk 18:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nothankyou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nothankyou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.music-news.com/shownews.asp?H=Tom-Vek-and-Olga-Bell--collaborate-on-new-single&nItemID=68800. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fylbecatulous talk 18:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Trincres17. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 13:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC) {subst:coin-notice}} Brianhe (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi Joe,

please have another look at this discussion, which has useful advice. Also, please remember you have to follow the wmf:Terms of Use (search for "Paid contributions"). You should declare your conflict of interest in the manner described there before your next article edit. Also, please stick to one account. Thank you, —Kusma (t·c) 11:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even listening to me? Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure or you will be blocked from editing. —Kusma (t·c) 14:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fufanu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fufanu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foxtrott (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Trincres17, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yann (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance with your COI issue

Hello Trincres17, I have good news for you: One of my "hobbies" here at Wikipedia is helping people with a conflict of interest get articles created or edited the way they want (insofar as that is possible within Wikipedia rules), and your situation has come to my attention. I see that you have worked on a number of articles and draft articles since creating your account. It's unlikely that I will be able to help you with all of them, but if you would pick one or two articles you most want assistance with, I'll see what I can do.

When replying to this message, please copy and paste [[User:GrammarFascist|GrammarFascist]] (it will display as just my username, but Wikipedia's software will alert me to your reply) somewhere in your response. If you don't, it could be days (or longer) before I see you have responded. Also don't forget to use a colon : at the beginning of every paragraph to indent your response, and to put four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your response so that it's "signed" with your username and timestamp. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 00:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GrammarFascist. Hi, Thanks a lot for noticing my predicament and offering to help, it is much appreciated. In terms of Artist pages that I would appreciate help with the most, I would focus on maybe 2 or 3 initially. Foxtrott is one that I tried to set up via the article recommendation area of Wikipedia, but was rejected. I still have the text saved if you need it? Along with this, there are warnings looming over Fufanu, God Damn (band) and Olga Bell, it would be nice to clear these up somehow? I'm sure you have the knowledge. Thanks, Joe Trincres17 (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just to reassure you, Trincres17 (or Joe if you prefer), the deletion evaluation for Fufanu has already ended with the consensus reached being to keep the article; the deletion evaluation for God Damn (band) has voting currently at 5 to keep and only 2 to delete; and it does not appear Olga Bell was ever nominated for deletion. The other notices at the top of each of those pages are found on many thousands of Wikipedia articles, and just mean that Wikipedia is aware the articles should be improved. (To link to any Wikipedia article from within Wikipedia, just put double square brackets around the article title, like so: [[Fufanu]] will display as Fufanu.)
I will evaluate the availability of sources to establish the notability of Draft:Foxtrott (Wikipedia has saved it as well) and, if there seem to be good reliable sources for that, I will start with it. Note that one benefit to being involved with the label, in terms of Wikipedia policies, is that it should be relatively easy for you to get photos which can be uploaded with the appropriate license for use in each of these articles.
I will probably only be able to work on one article about artists you represent at a time, aside from perhaps some minor edits. You should consider what your second choice of band/musician should be in case it looks like there are not (yet) enough reliable sources to establish Foxtrott's notability. Be aware, however, that the draft article will be saved so long as it is being worked on at least every few months, so waiting for articles to be written in major publications, then citing those properly in the draft and resubmitting, would be an option. Articles can be resubmitted indefinitely.
I know Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidelines and it can all be a bit bewildering to newcomers. Don't hesitate to ask if you have more questions, either by copy and pasting [[User:GrammarFascist|GrammarFascist]] here, or by going to the Teahouse. Just as a reminder, though, while you are not forbidden from editing articles for which you have a conflict of interest, you are discouraged from doing so. It's better to post on the Talk page of the article in question stating what additional information, correction or other edit you think should be made is. You can find instructions for making such a request at Wikipedia:Edit requests. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 18:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, it appears that Foxtrott does not meet Wikipedia's notability standard at this time. You should keep an eye out for in-depth articles about her, her albums, and/or her performances; articles should be at least a full page (for magazines), and ideally run multiple pages. A minimum of two such articles (that are not simply interviews, though they can include quotes from her) from notable publications are needed in order for Foxtrott to be eligible for a Wikipedia article. I did make a few improvements to the draft including adding a new source and putting in source information for a quotation that was in the draft but unattributed.
I am now going to evaluate the artists for whom you previously tried to create an article which was deleted. Perhaps one of them can have an article after all. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GrammarFascist, Hi, Thank you so much for your continued help. Wild Palms (band) is another article i created that appears to be up for deletion soon, it might might worth some editing to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia guidelines and standards to help avoid deletion. Trincres17 (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Olga Bell's Krai album

Great news! Olga Bell's album Krai, for which you previously tried to create a Wikipedia article, is sufficiently notable to have its own article. I will begin working on it now. You will be able to view the draft at this link: Draft:Krai (album). You can leave any suggestions or corrections here, just be sure to paste my username code so that Wikipedia notifies me. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 23:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've run into something that confuses me. Some sources say Krai was released on New Amsterdam Records, but others say One Little Indian Records released the album. Can you clarify which it is? Is this maybe a US vs. UK distribution thing? Also, is there a way you can give me access to the liner notes from the album so I can fill in other performers, any co-writers, etc.? Credits for the album don't seem to be up online even at the labels' websites. As you can see in the draft, the Track listing table is kind of empty. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 01:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've discovered my guess was correct regarding the two labels, and the distinction is now in the article with a source cited. I would still like information about album credits such as any other credited writers, credited musicians, etc.
  • Since this article is (I think) nearly ready to be upgraded from draft status, you should consider the feasibility of making an album cover image available for use on Wikipedia. A promotional image from the Krai premiere performance would also make a nice illustration for the article, if the label owns copyright to any such images.
  • Please check the draft carefully for any incorrect information. Sources, even reliable ones, aren't always 100% correct. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 06:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trincres17&oldid=683451058"