Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hong Kong

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Hong Kong. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Hong Kong|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Hong Kong. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to China.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hong Kong/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Hong Kong related deletions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈^discuss 09:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ching Cheung Ying

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability guidelines. JTtheOG (talk) 01:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Sha Tin District Council, weak keep One of the more significant mention [1]. Medal of Honour source is extremely weak [2], amounting only like "Ching did good at the DC, so here's a medal". Mostly it is just Ching invited for comment for various news events (eg. [3][4][5]) passing passing passingly listed passing in DC opponent interview passing. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 03:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 03:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 03:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 03:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't see any more than local notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I found the same sources as User:Hisashiyarouin and would say they amount to a bare pass of WP:GNG. I think his inclusion on the 2007 Hong Kong honours list is of substantial importance - very few opposition politicians in Hong Kong get them. Local notability is still notability. Der yck C. 16:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Gaertner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person has had minor acting roles, don't believe he meets WP:NACTOR. Has his own company but don't believe that makes him notable. Fails GNG as well IMO Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's nothing to suggest better notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There's this interview on one of the two English newspapers in Hong Kong, but otherwise it's mostly passing interviews and routine mentions of his work in mainstream media. Der yck C. 17:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Trivial roles. DGG ( talk ) 22:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.