I'm a newbie at this, so please forgive me for probably overlooking the obvious! Your reason was "Previous issues not addressed." And yet there was only one issue the first time, and that was an excessive amount of sources. I had about 72 citations, and was worried that there were too many; so I reduced it to 15 and deleted some material.
I was under the impression that documentation is important. So I do have have external and internal (Wikipedia) links for those who seek additional facts.
Kamala Devi is very important in her field of expertise, and I'm totally frustrated that I can't seem to finalize a submission!!!! I've read the rules and have tried to follow them. But clearly I'm missing something.
Would you explain to me what I'm doing wrong so I can correct it? I'd really love to have this article published on Wikipedia. :-)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
@Aman33445: Stop it. This is enough. First of all, you don't own page, so everyone is free to remove any content. Second off al, most of the conten you add is unsourced which is a big no-no. You want advice? Here it is: stop adding unsourced content and stop asking people to remove information. It's not your decision; it's the community's. I'm done with you. Callmemirela🍁{Talk}♑12:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a lot of info about her being in this film including a reference just after the film name in the intro, her mention as starring in the lead and referenced mention in the production section. Given your edit summary "Rv, no mention of her being given a role or just a cameo appearance; all we know is she just filmed." you may wish to make the rest of the article consistent. I'm not generally following this article, I was just cleaning up after an IP vandal when I came across it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Geraldo Perez: Oh, I understand. I thought you were apart of the article. All we've known so far is that Selena Gomez has filmed for the film. That's it. Is it a main role? A cameo? A minimal role? We don't know. That's why adding her is rather unsourced. She should only be added until she is confirmed a role of any kind in the movie. I hope that makes it clearly? I am open to suggestions. I will clean the article in regards to this. Callmemirela🍁{Talk}♑22:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking time to review, could you please be a little more specific in highlighting offending sales type text. For me it doesn't read as a sales message so I am blind. A few pointers will go a long way in helping me resolve these issues.