User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Callmemirela. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Jessie episode guide
What's wrong with saying "Kids" in the episode descriptions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.55.157 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Please read WP:SLANG. It's been explained a bunch of times. I will not reexplain for others. Callmemirela (Go Habs Go!) 22:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Jessie Guide
"Kids" isn't slang at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.55.157 (talk) 00:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. It is the informal version of "children". Please open a discussion at Talk:List of Jessie episodes to discuss about with other users. It's been explained before and it is wrong to use kids on Wikipedia. Callmemirela (Go Habs Go!) 01:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are interested in the article on the talk page. After removing tons of useless information only one reference turned out and good and the page remains a stub. I though I'd let you know and am seeing if you think it should be deleted or merged with Scythian religion. With regards Psychotic Spartan 123 12:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- @PsychoticSpartan123: I am not exactly familiar with the article or its origins. I was merely reviewing that article during the time. However, after reviewing the article, I do agree that it should be moved to Scythian religion as there is not enough content to go on with the article and it's just a waste for a page with small content. However, I don't if the move should be made right away or we should consult other involved editors? Though, since no replies have been to your discussion on the talk page, the first option seems to be fitting. Callmemirela (Go Habs Go!) 23:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Callmemirela: Thanks for redirecting the page. I forgot all about it. Psychotic Spartan 123 02:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Jamie Dornan's image
There has been a conflict over the use of the infobox image in the Jamie Dornan page, I'm hoping that a vote to choose a preferred image would settle the dispute. I am therefore writing to those editors who have ever edited Jamie Dornan page to voice their opinion in the Jamie Dornan Talk page so we can reach a consensus. I would welcome your opinion. Hzh (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Hzh: I added input. Callmemirela (Talk) 20:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. It's often difficult to get people to vote on particular issue for many pages, so your contribution is very much appreciated. Just a note that the Image 1 you chose is the one from 2011 (I probably should have mentioned that the images are arranged from the earliest to the latest), the latest image is Image 3 which is from this year 2015. Sorry for any confusion. Hzh (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
TY
Appreciate your support at AN/I. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Winkelvi: No problem ☺️ Callmemirela (Talk) 01:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Weegeerunner (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Donald Sadler article
Thanks for reviewing the new article and for the encouraging comment! TowardsTheLight (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- @TowardsTheLight: You are most welcome (: Callmemirela (Talk) 23:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Responding to your message at my Rockies77 talk page about 2015 in ice sports
Hello to you. Well, I do have 9 categories there. However, I am still new to adding relevant categories to a new article. As you probably have seen the 2015 in sports article is way too large. Anyway, thank you for your input in this matter. I will see what other categories to add there. Rockies77 (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Rockies77: No problem. However, there is more to 2015 in ice sports. What events have happened in 2015 in terms of ice sports? The recent IIHF is one example. This is what I meant by additional categories. Callmemirela (Talk) 00:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Young and Hungry
I accidently reverted your edit. Sorry!!Catty319 (talk) 23:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Catty319: No worries (: Callmemirela (Talk) 23:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks
Many thanks for reverting an edit on my talk page. An editor put an item about an international cup (?) on my talk page and it is very unclear why this was done. Many thanks again-RFD (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- @RFD: You are most welcome :D Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 22:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Re: Rules
- And where exactly is this rule?
It's in many places, and it plays a role not just in best practices, but also in our policies and guidelines. To begin with, you can find its foundation in two of our policies: WP:CIV (participate in a respectful and considerate way, and avoid directing offensive language at others; discussion of other editors should be limited to polite discourse about their actions; avoid belittling a fellow editor) and WP:NPA (comment on content, not on the contributor). Finally, you can find these policies applied in the behavioral guidelines, such as those governing discussions in project space, such as Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, which stipulates how to avoid attacking other editors in the headings of discussions (see WP:TALKNEW): don't be critical in headings, don't address other users in a heading, and never use headings to attack other users. I should note, that in practice, there is an exception for addressing other users in a heading, but that only applies to admin noticeboards about editorial conduct disputes. On the other hand, on a regular article talk page, we generally avoid talking about other users in the heading, preferring to focus only on content. I realize that this can get confusing. Viriditas (talk) 22:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
The Originals
Why do you say TO averaged 1.81M and 0.9? That article was posted back in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.212.129 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- First off, I am not saying anything in regards of content. I revert you is because of the way you remove it. You add discussions in the article, which fails policy. Secondly, in regards to the average, it gets confusing. I know. But those average are right, even if the show or series never reached whatever share. Two and a Half Men is one example and Bones (TV series) as well. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 18:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
But that article is from May 2014, way before the season even began. Its not confusing, It's just completely wrong, and not a valid source. It should be TBA until Deadline or TVbytheNumbers posts an article about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisLoudMorningxThisQuietNight (talk • contribs) 18:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- @ThisLoudMorningxThisQuietNight: I will review the source. But please next time, discuss on talk pages. This is an encyclopedia not a forum. Discuss changes by on talk page not in articles by using the <!-- --> tags. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 19:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- @ThisLoudMorningxThisQuietNight: You were right. However, the ratings were correct it was that the source used was wrong. I have updated it. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 19:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me!!! Chicago MED
HI I PROVIDED A SOURCE ON THE CHARACTER. AND THAT MEANS I PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU??? YOU NEED HELP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:1C80:221C:88F4:4633:8DB4:DE01 (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Another personal attack. First, I do not need help. Second of all, you were being uncivil by stating that I need "Red it and pay attention." That is very offensive for me. I can read; I am not stupid. I am enforcing policy is all I am doing. I am giving you my last warning for all edits. You are using multiple accounts to edit per WP:SOCK. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 05:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Callmemirela. As a reminder, WP:3RR applies to you as well. Please note that reverting material that you feel violates WP:NPOV is not an exception to WP:EDITWAR or the 3RR rule. I suggest ceasing immediately and discussing the edit on the talk page or requesting a third opinion. Continuing to revert will result in a block. Tiptoety talk 05:36, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Tiptoety: I understand that, but the user has commited sockpuppetry and has made uncivil comments towards me. What else should I do? I've tried but the IP is being an IP, unfortunately. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 05:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- You have a lot of other options. Report them as a sock, ask for the article to be protected, contact an administrator. Just don't edit war, it does nothing and just ends up getting you in trouble. Tiptoety talk 05:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Tiptoety: This is all a lot of work to be done by mobile. I've ceased the reverts. It has happened to everyone to be on edge, unfortunately. And I don't plan to get blocked anytime soon. Thank you for the notice! Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 05:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Tiptoety: Uh oh, another sockpuppet. I am staying out, but could you do something? Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 05:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Problem solved. Tiptoety talk 06:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Tiptoety: Thank you for the help! And again, thank you for the notice. I am never perfect with my 3RR. It will take time to adjust, just like anybody else, but I will get it someday. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 06:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Problem solved. Tiptoety talk 06:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- You have a lot of other options. Report them as a sock, ask for the article to be protected, contact an administrator. Just don't edit war, it does nothing and just ends up getting you in trouble. Tiptoety talk 05:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Grey (book) (June 14)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grey (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Callmemirela,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Grey (novel) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)- I'd declined this but I ended up double thinking this. I figure that between the theft and the initial reports on the impending release, that should be enough to merit an article. It'll release in 4 days so there are bound to be a few reviews in the next couple of days. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- It'd probably be a good idea to start a page for the series/franchise since now there are the films, the books, and the merchandise as a whole. You interested? If so, hit me up on my talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Please reconsider your archiving
Hello C. I notice that you are archiving threads like this one on the same day that they are closed. There are some problems with that. First and foremost, due to the nature of how time is kept on Earth, there are editors who will not have had a chance to read the threads. For example most of the thread that I linked to took place while I was asleep. Even if it has been closed there is informative value to editors by reading a closed thread. Next, threads have been known to be reopened. Next, the bot archiving still works and it is only in special cases (like an extraordinarily long thread) that it is helpful to manually archive a thread. Don't get me wrong I know that you are trying to be helpful but these are things that you need to consider as you proceed. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 15:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- @MarnetteD: It would be helpful if the time stamp was in EST. UTC confuses me all the time and it gets me annoyed. Normally I leave it for half of the day to a day. I archive threads, perhaps too early, it's because to avoid clutter. Have you seen the number of threads open as right now? It's long and very detailed. However, I have not ruled out the other involved editors. Nonetheless, I will limit my archiving. May I ask, in your opinion, how long it should be before I archive? PS: I restored the thread in your message. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 15:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply C. I know there is clutter but that is the nature of that page. If it were me I would, at the least, let 48 hours pass before archiving. 72 hours might be better. Another thing to consider is if the close takes place on a weekend. There are times that even the most active editor takes the weekend off. Now these are just one persons opinions and suggestions. If you want you could seek out other editors input. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 15:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you (: I will limit the archiving as of now. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 15:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- There's a couple of available solutions to your clock problem. Go to Preferences→Appearance, and check either "Add a clock in the personal toolbar that displays the current time in UTC" or " Change UTC-based times and dates, such as those used in signatures, to be relative to local time". -- Diannaa (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I unfortunately do not have anything to check in relation to the options you just mentioned. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 01:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad, try Preferences→Gadgets→Appearance, and see if these options are listed. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I found it! Thanks. It's been checked. Now this will save me a lot of time. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 03:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad, try Preferences→Gadgets→Appearance, and see if these options are listed. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I unfortunately do not have anything to check in relation to the options you just mentioned. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 01:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- There's a couple of available solutions to your clock problem. Go to Preferences→Appearance, and check either "Add a clock in the personal toolbar that displays the current time in UTC" or " Change UTC-based times and dates, such as those used in signatures, to be relative to local time". -- Diannaa (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you (: I will limit the archiving as of now. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 15:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply C. I know there is clutter but that is the nature of that page. If it were me I would, at the least, let 48 hours pass before archiving. 72 hours might be better. Another thing to consider is if the close takes place on a weekend. There are times that even the most active editor takes the weekend off. Now these are just one persons opinions and suggestions. If you want you could seek out other editors input. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 15:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Darkwind (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Callmemirela (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit to my wrongdoings, quite frankly. I know that edit warring wasn't the place and I should have reported them earlier rather than dealing with a block (something I had been trying to avoid for two years). I do apologize for my actions and I seriously promise to avoid edit warring and violating 3rr again. After 1 revert, I let other users handle it. Thank you for considering my unblock, Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Sounds fine to me - - unblocking based on time served. I feel a block was particularly inappropriate as it prevents you from explaining to the IP why they should not repeatedly add unverifiable content, and it stops you from requesting page protection. I would personally have semi-protected the article for 12 hours, not blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: Thank you so much. I know that edit warring wasn't the right solution, but I was doing it for the right reasons since it doesn't follow WP:SOURCES and WP:Verifiability which eventually lead to a WP:NPA by the sock puppet. I also think that the block was unfair, but hey every admin has their own morals and reasons. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 15:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
non-admin closures
Regarding your closure here [1] if you really aren't sure if the situation is resolved, as a non-admin you really shouldn't be closing it.--211.215.156.184 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- You don't get to tell me what to do. The conversation ceased when the user was blocked and no action had taken place. People are more than welcome to continue the conversation. So I request you leave me alone and mind your own business. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 13:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
50 First Dates
Hello, Callmemirela (or should I call you Mirela?). Anyway, just to let you know, someone's repeatedly vandalized the article on the movie 50 First Dates, changing names, pronouns etc. You know this already, because you reverted this person's first "edit". Afterwards, he undid your reversion. Just now, I re-reverted the page to your version. Perhaps, if this person keeps it up, it would by a good idea to put the article under lock and key, yes? 80.61.230.65 (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC) (Sorry, didn't take the time to log in. I'm Ieneach fan 'e Esk, from the Frisian Wikipedia.)
- You can call me by my username or by real name Mirela, it really doesn't matter (: Regarding the IP, I do see some similarities of changing names, however they've only made one edit with that IP and it isn't enough to report them. Nevertheless, I have added the article to my watchlist to keep an eye on it. If more vandalism returns, I will request page protection. Thank you for the notice (: Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Glad to be of service. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
FYI
Hi again C. I wanted to let you know that 67.184.255.230 (talk · contribs) has already been blocked. I know that those 3rr reports take some work (whew) so you can leave it or remove it as you wish. Enjoy the week ahead. MarnetteD|Talk 18:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- @MarnetteD: I like how you're calling me C. It's cute :P Anyways, yes, I knew after I reported them to the boards. I have removed the report and the notice as it was no longer required. On a side note, I would like to thank you for your recent help, reverting personal attacks when I wasn't around and so on. It's not easy to do it by mobile :P Again, I thank you so much for your help (: Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 18:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- You are most welcome C :-) I am glad to help when I can. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 19:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Chicago Med Art
Hi you took off the Chicago Med picture on the page, and didn't replace it with a new one. Why are you always deleting and not editing properly? the page needs a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:245:0:101F:2D7A:3A06:9B0D:4056 (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Seriously, I agree with the comment above, why did you remove the shows picture and not replace it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchme420 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- I find it ironic how the IP posts on my talk page then Watchme420 is created around the same time and agrees to this. WP:SOCK it seems. To answer your questions, I removed the main image because it was a fan-made poster and not real. The image was real, but not the poster. I can't upload a new key art, because it has to follow WP:FREEIMAGE or else it fails WP:COPYRIGHT. Understood? This is the last time I deal with the same persistent user from the Chicago Med page. Leave me alone or else I will report you. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 17:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
CSI: Cyber
The tv show has been renewed for a second season. Caden cool 19:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Caden: That has nothing to do with the reversions... Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 20:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Whether or not you can or can't see the video is not my responsibility. However if you must challenge the other editor's source, that's fine. The burden falls on you. Caden cool 21:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Caden: And yet you keep reverting my reverts without a proper reason. You haven't even dealt with the main issue that if the said content is true or not. You are not being very cooperative right now. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- I gave you a proper reason and dealt with the main reason, you choose to ignore it. The burden lies with you. And implying that User:Lucd13 is lying will not help your case. Btw you are at the 3rr limit. Caden cool 22:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oh and this [2] is called canvassing. That's a big no no. Caden cool 22:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Caden: Are you hounding me now? Explain to me how exactly my message asking a user to check about the source then just plainly then expressing an opinion is canvassing? It doesn't violate the canvassing's innapropriate ways. Am I spamming? No. Am I campaigning? No. Am I vote staking? No. There's no off-wiki discussion. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 23:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oh and this [2] is called canvassing. That's a big no no. Caden cool 22:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- I gave you a proper reason and dealt with the main reason, you choose to ignore it. The burden lies with you. And implying that User:Lucd13 is lying will not help your case. Btw you are at the 3rr limit. Caden cool 22:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Caden: And yet you keep reverting my reverts without a proper reason. You haven't even dealt with the main issue that if the said content is true or not. You are not being very cooperative right now. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Whether or not you can or can't see the video is not my responsibility. However if you must challenge the other editor's source, that's fine. The burden falls on you. Caden cool 21:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Callmemirela, you were in the wrong in this business, and made trouble for a user who didn't deserve it, so please don't be so defensive. Nobody's "hounding" you. (Though you might as well stop posting here, Caden; you've made your point.) Did you see this reference to what the policy is re sources some people can't access? Well, I expect you did, since you posted right after it. I'm sure you won't keep edit warring on CSI: Cyber now that you've seen it. Bishonen | talk 07:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: Yes, I read that user's post on the ANI. I checked it out and made a request on the resource, and a user confirmed the said content was true. However, on my part, a source not being accessible to anyone is not exactly right. Anyone is capable of saying whatever and add whatever source from other countries and it was plainly improperly sourced. That's just my opinion. I have moved on. When I get the time today (I'm on a weekend trip in Toronto), I will send my excuses to L (I don't remember his name, unfortunately) and explain to him/her my actions, but remind them communication would had been better than this ordeal. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 13:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Message was sent. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 14:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)