User talk:Trivialist

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

hey trivialist - thanks for the heads up on Carrot. I actually still had more to add and atually have no monetary tie to Carrot or Vice past having worked for a few month contract for Vice a few years back. I'm just interested. :)

I'll post the same as you suggested but wanted to give you a thanks for letting me know.

Recent

I reported him to AIV. No need to give warnings. User has major CIR and IDHT issues. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Birds Seasons app icon (by Rowdypup

Do you know why the Angry Birds Seasons app icon image is always being reverted back to "Fairy Hogmother"? I've been playing the game since it was released, and that icon was for February- 5 months from now! Why isn't the app icon current (Summer Camp) like it's supposed to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowdypup (talk • contribs) 15:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete File:Fattymariosm64ds.jpg, File:Mario64dscourtyardlwm.jpg, and File:SmittenKitten4.jpg

Can you restore these 3 images? YoshiFan155 (talk) 00:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films directed by John Schultz (director) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Films directed by John Schultz (director), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Incidents at McDonald's has been nominated for discussion

Category:Incidents at McDonald's, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ansh 666 01:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kells dead link

Hi. The dead link which you correctly identified turned out to have been moved to a different address on the same website, which was easily found by typing "Kells" into the search box on that page. It's always better to have a go at updating an apparently "dead" link before removing all reference to it. Cheers and best wishes, Bjenks (talk) 01:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my edit

really sorry about that, done it on the wrong page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.12.22 (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take On Me

Please see Talk:Take on Me#Requested move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swedish Norwegian Guy (talk • contribs) 01:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what? The requested move was from two years ago and completed to move TO "Take On Me"... why has this now been moved back to "Take on Me" with no prior discussion? Richard3120 (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Norwegian Guy, why has your first edit on Wikipedia been to notify another editor of a requested move that was completed two years ago? Richard3120 (talk) 02:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this and this

I've been dealing with that troll for a while now. Since you have reverted them multiple times, I was wondering if you could provide me with any context? Is it a known sock? Any discussions about this? If there's any link like that it would be very handy. —DangerousJXD (talk) 23:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

mks_vir – Proposed Deletion

I disagreed with your Proposed Deletion. Explanation in the Talk:mks_vir. We may continue the discussion there. Kpc21 [TALK] 01:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpc21 (talk • contribs)

Regarding Sourced Media Books and Osmond Marketing

In reviewing Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, I can see how the pages "Sourced Media Books" and "Osmond Marketing" would have been deleted before, because the voice wasn't as neutral and objective as it should have been per G11. However, the new articles are not substantially similar. With the previous iterations, there was a comment claiming A7 applied. However, these companies are notable, as the film "Waffle Street" starring Danny Glover and James Lafferty was based on a book published by Sourced Media Books (Sourced Media Books is owned by Osmond Marketing). I have listed many independent, 3rd party sources vouching for this, so it represents a credible claim to significance. If you believe something to the contrary, an explanation as to which rules you're referencing would certainly help determine whether there's any validity to your claim. Any feedback from you regarding this would be appreciated. Thank you!

Jeremyb949 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Kayleigh McEnany is a famous and newsworthy person

Kayleigh McEnany is a constant guest on CNN and must be known by tens of millions of people already, just on that basis. I can't help but wonder if you want to delete the article because you don't like her. That is not a legitimate reason to delete an article on anybody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tesint (talk • contribs) 02:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6] Kayleigh McEnany clearly meets this standard, having received coverage hundreds of times in third party websites. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7] The number of references clearly works to establish notability Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in What Wikipedia is not. KM clearly does not meet any exclusionary criteria. Tesint (talk) 22:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dog-whistle politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Food stamps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trivialist, not sure why my Bea Munro page was marked for speedy deletion, and if so could you remove? The artist is a UK upcoming artist and therefore I feel there was no need to mark for speedy deletion, as the subject is notable enough to be included in an online encyclopedia

JD1991 (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Television controversies in the United States

You recently created a category on Category:Television controversies in the United States. When creating categories on such topics, could you please add them as subcategories to Category:Television in the United States which covers relevant subjects?

I think you are doing a pretty good job on creating new categories, but some of them may need additional parents to be easy to locate. Dimadick (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm Iboughttoomanygames, and I never intended my Project Shrine Maiden page to go on the mainspace. I KNOW it's a hoax, and want it to stay on my userspace. I know it isn't real, but it's my userspace, and I can play with it. Thank you. 64.134.66.10 (talk) 02:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the year dates in the Warner Bros. Cartoons article

Saying Founded 1933 and Defunct 1969 makes it sound like Warner Bros. Cartoons didn't get defunct in 1963 and continued producing cartoons after 1964. 71.95.61.24 (talk) 17:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Social Security lawsuits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television series created by Barbara Hall (TV producer) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Television series created by Barbara Hall (TV producer), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Hello, just wanted to give you a heads up that three recent edits of yours were reverted by me at Warner Home Video while reverting edits made by a socking IP. I believe all of your edits were only necessary because of the edits made by the IP, but I could be wrong, so please feel free to check if you have a moment. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Teleplays by Joss Whedon has been nominated for discussion

Category:Teleplays by Joss Whedon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Publix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Food stamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV Tracker

The TV Tracker is created by someone who has access to the programming. He uses them to show them to us. The Time Warner Cable website also has the Looney Tunes programming back on the air. SquishyZ1 (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Check Time Warner Cable's programming. At 10am pacific time, they air Looney Tunes. SquishyZ1 (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reruns of Looney Tunes

I know that, but TWC has a full schedule for Looney Tunes. SquishyZ1 (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Na Mooneys (album)

What the hell? HurluGumene (talk) 01:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Jennifer Freed, PhD.

How can I make it so that the page doesn't get deleted? I've never done an entry before and would like some help.