User talk:Sro23

Archives

Consensus

How do you want to come to this? Mateoski06 (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mateoski06, when your edits are reverted by more than one person, instead of simply re-reverting, the wiser decision would be to start a discussion on the relevant talk page. Also, the more opinions the better, so WP:RFC might be a good idea as well. That way, we can come to reach consensus to move forward while minimizing disruption and edit-warring. Sro23 (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the talk page for this specific article and sidebar? Mateoski06 (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean Template talk:Discrimination sidebar? Sro23 (talk) 21:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for removing the barnstar on my page. When I saw it I confused Pederasty and Pedagogy and I was trying to work out who I'd been teaching. When I spotted the error I was appaled. Thank you for the speedy removal SPACKlick (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you Sro from me, and Favonian for mopping up. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Judging from this list, the creep was ramping up for a major assault. Stay tuned! Favonian (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! KingShowman had a way with words and liked showing it off... _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hair clippers

Why are you removing my information on hair clippers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.52.48 (talk) 02:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

‎Hair clippers

Good call on that sock. I didn't recognize him. No offense, but I nuked the entire thread from my talk page even though you had commented there too. Meters (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No offense taken, Filipz123 has a tendency to annoy editors who revert their edits so I can understand why you would want to remove that rant. Sro23 (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And he's already shown up on my page again with his latest IP. Meters (talk) 03:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been busy...

reverting that annoying little sock on my talk page. Thank you very much. My talk page and user page are now semi-protected, so they should be safe. However, I'm sure he will turn his attention to something else equally annoying. thanks again Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Talk:Abkhazia.The discussion is about the topic Talk:Abkhazia. Thank you. Lurking shadow (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your persistent and careful research on flagging and fixing sockpuppetry on Steven G. Bradbury. Ich (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Scott Chamberlain db-a7

Hi. I'm afraid I just wasn't sure which speedy criterion would count for this page, which once had a not-notable bio but now has nowhere it ought really to point to — it now points to a bishop with a completely different middle name, so I thought complete deletion best. DBD 18:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now, and I have redirected the page to Nicholas Chamberlaine with the "e". I guess it was originally created as a common misspelling redirect before the Nicholas Chamberlain w/o the "e" article was created. Sro23 (talk) 18:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ritvik12

Whyd you remoev my message from WP:Refund. I want my original account block lifted. 2600:1010:B024:A937:9080:6B:B044:9E79 (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've told you this before, your best option is to try the standard offer of no editing (this includes as an IP) for six months, then appealing via UTRS once again. Sro23 (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't wait for that long, as a few admins said I can appeal it now. SummerPhD2v.0. also said that. I did it multiple times. Did you see the request? I was also told to discuss the issue on Ritvik12 sockpuppet page, but it's semi-protected. 2600:1010:B024:A937:9080:6B:B044:9E79 (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you wait that long? What's the rush? --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 22:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

You have requested speedy deletions on 3 articles, Brendan Anthem, Jaxon Calkins, and The TA Network. I ask that you remove the speedy deletion notice from those pages, because they are all suffieciently following the guildlines and criteria. All information that has been made about the network and its actors was put on the articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceSong (talk • contribs) 22:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brendanator22. That is all. Sro23 (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These articles have simply been made in correspondence to the The TA Network's upcoming show. I was wrongfully thought to be creating these articles about myself, and made the mistake of deleting the speedy deletions when I did not know what they were. There was no sock puppetry going on here. I requested the name change to clear up any confusion.PrinceSong (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

trolls

Subsidized Internet connections, eh? Wish I had one of those. clpo13_(talk) 22:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

Hi there,

I've added semi-protection to your talk page for 2 weeks due to all the vandalism. If you'd like me to remove it, please let me know. Best, Mike V • Talk 18:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mike V. I gave it some thought and in my opinion, it's no longer necessary. Would you mind unprotecting? Sro23 (talk) 12:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mike V • Talk 14:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You want protection back? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~No, I think I'll be okay. Sro23 (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)~~ Actually this is getting ridiculous. How about for like a few hours? Sro23 (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huffington post talk discussion

Hi,

Do you have anything to add to the talk? If there is no further discussion or objections than the discussion is resolved. Marquis de Faux (talk) 03:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rectify 54

Wait, I am proving the right paragraphs, I was trying to help,. Rectify 54 (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

What I meant when I said "again"

"Again", basically not to do it again a second time in future, not so much an accusation for having done it before. Thanks for pointing out. International Pumpkin (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fexlajahd

I noticed this one too. Considering their only non-userspace edits are to Hamas-related areas, where ECP is often applied, it may be best to report them at ANI. They just hit 500 edits. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 22:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just made this edit. I have reverted. Sro23 (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I would've done it myself, but I had to step away for a bit. At any rate, it's been handled. Thanks again, and happy editing. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 23:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the reverts on my talk, That IP just ain't giving up.Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 01:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		I suppose you're not a true recent changes patroller until you've had gay porn splashed on your talk page. Thanks for all the shit you put up with; I hope you're getting the support you need. Kuru (talk) 02:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! Why revert my edits ?

I saw that you reverted 2 of my edits in Kottarakara, I only added the correct information, and by the way the new edit has Karunagapally & Punalur written as cities, they are not cities but are municipal towns, I wonder why you reverted my edit, if you would tell me it would be good, and please I am putting my edits back again to Kottarakara, please do not revert them this time.

Thank You

D'artanian (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Love (Justin Timberlake song)

Can you keep an eye of the page? 115.164.91.40 (talk) 04:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?

Hi Sro23! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a very active Twinkle user (top 25, actually!). The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle User. Include the following information:

Username
Email where we can reach you
Your city or time zone
Best time to talk to you
Your primary use of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atacama Skeleton

Sro23, My apologies for editing without providing an RS. I am a novice wikipedia user and am unfamiliar with the policies. However, the information I provided is crucial to the truthfulness of this page. I have provided an RS with my information so that it is not "PoV", yet my edit was still reverted. I would like to know why. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgbrux (talk • contribs) 22:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About Blue Cat Blues..

The Tom and Jerry short "Blue Cat Blues" was removed in future syndications on Cartoon Network internationally likely due to the references of alcohol and the morbid joke of Tom and Jerry killing themselves on a railroad track that would be not suitable for Cartoon Network's standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasPussyCat (talk • contribs) 10:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet accusations

What makes you think I'm a sockpuppet? A picture of a dead fish (talk) 02:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't say why. WP:BEANS. Sro23 (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you haven't filed an SPI yet? A picture of a dead fish (talk) 02:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because SPI requires the filer to provide evidence, and again, WP:BEANS. I guess maybe I could email them, but honestly I feel too lazy right now. Sro23 (talk) 02:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buhid alphabet

Hi, I'm not sure I see why you did that. Is there any thing I'm missing? Uanfala (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see: most of the content was contributed by a now blocked puppet. Are they known to produce bad content on alphabet articles? 08:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talk • contribs)

Yes, it was added by a Vodkapoise sock, and I don't trust anything this person says as they have a history of hoaxing and vandalism. Examples:[1] [2] etc. I should have explained in my edit summary, sorry about that. Sro23 (talk) 13:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Sro, how do you even keep count??? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. I'll add back the parts of the table I can source and leave out the (dubious) IPA info. Thanks. DRMcCreedy (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rectify 54

Sro 23, Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rectify 54 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC) Disney's Hocus Pocus is not one of the horror films we see.[reply]

Joe Menendez

Please don't undo these edits. They are correct and verifiable and in most case referenced dutifully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belloq69 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected edits. DO NOT UNDO. --Belloq69 (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Belloq69: You are welcome to join the discussion I started on Talk:Joe Menendez. I really, really don't want to notify WP:BLPN or WP:ANEW, I would much rather we come to some sort of agreement on our own, but if you continue edit warring and violating BLP policies by adding unsourced/poorly sourced information about a living person, I might have to. Also, I see you have referenced IMDb quite a lot in the article. Per WP:RS/IMDB, it is not considered a reliable source. Sro23 (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accusation

Might I ask why you tagged User:A picture of a dead fish as a sockpuppet? Per WP:HSOCK, only blocked accounts should be tagged and only upon sufficient evidence. Removing. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again. No evidence has been provided. Please do not make any more reverts without first replying to this comment. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've already said this once before, but per WP:BEANS: if I say why I think the accounts are sockpuppets, you will change your behavior. You are free to keep creating a new sock each time I spot you, but I have a feeling that even if I present no evidence or open a SPI, the accounts will be blocked soon enough. Sro23 (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason, per WP:HSOCK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.78.77.19 (talk) 00:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, with 24.15.68.186. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 02:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[3]. Sro23 (talk) 02:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 02:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to start an SPI? 126.78.77.19 (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you would want to start an SPI concerning yourself, but sure, I guess that would mean less work for the rest of us. Sro23 (talk)

You are very funny. I also urge you to please stop reverting suspected socks on the grounds that you believe that they're socks without evidence as you did here and here. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 03:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How does reverting an edit make me a sock? Essential Oils (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You think I'm a sock don't you! Then why don't you report me?

question

Do you believe that User:A picture of a dead fish and User:Essential Oils are sockpuppets because of their shared habit of recent changes patrolling as new users, and similar account creation date? Because IMHO, that's a very weak reason! 126.78.77.19 (talk) 03:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, there's more to it than that, but again, WP:BEANS. Sro23 (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing that would be rhetorical style and/or punctuation. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 03:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, I'm not telling why. It would not be very smart of me to give away how I know it's you. Sro23 (talk) 03:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With only 10 edits, there's a very limited amount of information which can be discovered about the User:Essential Oils account. You've practically spilled the WP:BEANS already! Game over. 126.78.77.19 (talk) 03:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And User:Essential Oils are good for you! Why do you want to have them blocked from Wikipedia? 126.78.77.19 (talk) 04:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for keeping so many articles clean of vandalism and other disruptive edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizing

Stop Vandalizing the Candace Young page i created it so respect thatAlanpopo123 (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage

Thanks for defending my userpage. If you've noticed, many people have changed it, even more than I have :/. I'd let the anon do whatever he wants with it until he's blocked. It's the easier way. Thanks again, and happy editing! -Primetime (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NYC DCAS

Hello Sro23

You keep making changes to this wiki page with wrong information. NYC DCAS (police) is not as a Police agency as pre the following (NYS CPL,NYC charter and NYS Divsion of Criminal justics service). A simple Google check and you will see that they are not listed in any of the above provided sites as a police dept or agency. As a member of a law enforcement agency in new York city I can assure you these facts, they are NYS peace officers who carry a firearm after the new York city police dept issue them a pistol permit. No Police agency in NYS issues their police officers a pistol permit. This is a fact that you can't dispute. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7085:AB00:7D58:1EC6:41B5:B3C (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop This Disruptive Editing !

Why did you revert edits by Arun.V.Paravur to Kollam article, this is 'Disruptive' he reverted edits done by Prof TPMS because he has respect for his hometown, while you simply revert edits and do nonsense without understanding other's feelings. Please stop doing this or I will report you.

Regards

117.250.215.96 (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

Hi Sro! If you don't mind, I've requested semi-protection for your talk page. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 19:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking out for me, I truly appreciate it. I don't mind the vandalism too much, so I think semi protection is not needed. Sro23 (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting the crazy vandal gone wild tonight! -- Dane2007 ^talk 00:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thank you Sro23 for blocking that idiot Sockpuppet who vandalised 3primetime3's user page, me and another WP user made tags for his user page and his IP socks.

Thank You

Gandalf the Wizard 07:49, 2 October 2016 (UTC)