Talk:Mahabharata
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mahabharata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mahabharata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Mahabharata was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2016
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Mahabharata is not the longest epic in the world. Manas and the Tibetan King of Gesar are the longest epics. Will provide sources later today. Alva2bryant (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Feel free to re-open template when you provide the sources Cannolis (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Use in German anti-Semitism
I have removed the section on "Use in German anti-Semitism". From the Mahabharata's point of view that's irrelevant trivia. It was hardly a significant work inspiring or affecting anti-Semitic thought in any way, and while it may have been abused in that way, that's not relevant to an understanding of the Mahabharata. Besides, the section offered too little context to be useful. There was no timeframe to allow us to put it in context - which idologists did so, when did they do so? Where did it cause anti-Brahminism - in Germany? in India? If the latter, why would British colonial authorities or the Indian public be influenced by anti-Semitic German ideologues and their far-fetched schemes? If the former, would regular Germans even have been able to tell Brahmins from other Indians? I rather doubt that. The reference pointed to more than a hundred pages; that's rather unspecific. If this line of German indology should be discussed at all, it's in the article on indology itself, not here. Huon (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- See discussion above. There was a dispute over whether to call it German or Nazi anti-Semitism, but no one suggested to delete the info. This material has CONSENSUS.VictoriaGraysonTalk 13:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- A vague, unclear passage about some tenuous connection to anti-semitism is irrelevant and inappropriate in an article on a millenia-old text. I don't see any consensus for adding that random section. There will be thousands of reliable sources on a subject like this - we don't include everything in this article, WP:WEIGHT is the guiding policy here. I'm removing that section again. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Written In city of Rourkela in Odisha
I want to share, It was written by Ganesh where as dictated by Ved Vyasa in Rourkela a city in Odisha. There is very big temple of Lord Shiva in a place called "Vedvyas" which is in the side of River Brahmani. In the ancient temple the cave and meditation place of rishi is also there. The tree is also present where Lord Ganesh sat and wrote the Granth. Itsyouranmol (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Synopsis
Would it be useful to have a brief book by book synopsis, instead of the current synopsis section?Bodha2 (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Nudity
Not essential to the Mahabharatha - just typical Wikiporn - the Fisherwoman picture showing the nipple is not at all modest and is in violation of Indian, Hindu, and Vedic standards of decency. I propose it should be removed. Samsbanned (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm curious to know whether the Khajuraho temple complex of Madhya Pradesh, India is also in violation of "Indian, Hindu, and Vedic standards of decency." CMurdock (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- B-Class Hinduism articles
- Top-importance Hinduism articles
- B-Class Krishnaism articles
- Top-importance Krishnaism articles
- B-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of High-importance
- B-Class Indian literature articles
- Unknown-importance Indian literature articles
- B-Class Indian literature articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Indian literature articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Poetry articles
- High-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- B-Class Mythology articles
- Top-importance Mythology articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles