User talk:Jakob9999

Welcome!

Hello, Jakob9999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bop rock, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gyrofrog (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bop rock

The article Bop rock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a neologism. No sources, and nothing that isn't already covered in Jazz fusion (or the Jazz-rock section therein). This could be turned into a redirect to that article, except that the term isn't really used in any notable context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bop metal

The article Bop metal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a neologism. No sources, and nothing that isn't already covered in Jazz fusion (or the Jazz-rock section therein). This could be turned into a redirect to that article, except that the term isn't really used in any notable context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael Jackson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ChamithN (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Alternative metal, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Heavy metal music, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Synthmetal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthmetal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthmetal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:File-New Text Document.png

Thanks for uploading File:File-New Text Document.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:File-New Text Document.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:File-New Text Document.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Synthpop reival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthpop reival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthpop reival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carbrera (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Synthpop reival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Industrial and Capital Cities (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Smooth Criminal. Rob van vee 05:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madness (band). Mlpearc (open channel) 20:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Door to Door (album). SummerPhD^v2.0 03:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 70's revival

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Jakob9999, thanks for creating 70's revival!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references to independent, reliable sources. Also, it should be renamed to 70s revival per MOS:DECADE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 70s revival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 70s revival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/70s revival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eleven Fifty Two

The article Eleven Fifty Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 19:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre changes

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Rush (band), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Circuit City, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sources are especially critical for "In popular culture"-type information in terms of establishing significance, as discussed at WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 13:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rockabilly Genre on Dio page

You raised a question about the sourcing for Dio's involvement in the Rockabilly genre, to which I responded. I'd appreciate it if you would state on the Dio Talk Page whether your concern is addressed or not. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]