Talk:Starbucks
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Starbucks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 91 days |
Stars and Bucks Cafe was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 September 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Starbucks. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Olo 07. This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Yeilingma. |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
International expansion: contradictions.
Seoul, Korea alone probably has over 700 Starbucks. South Korea alone probably more than 870 Stores. I would say 900-1,000 Stores. South Korea need Starbucks Drive-Thru system in all City or City outskirt areas. Weather, people, Culture, family, friends make Starbucks very big business in Korea.
None of the countries listed in the continent columns are referenced, and some listed in there are not colored on the map, e.g. South Africa. -- Jeandré, 2011-06-18t13:43z
Logo
Is it still Ishtar on the logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.28.108 (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Unicorn Frappuccino
Interested in helping to expand Unicorn Frappuccino? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
In the Israel section it says Howard Shultz is the CEO
In the Israel section it says Howard Shultz is the CEOJsd57 (talk) 17:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- 142.116.206.150 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. General Ization Talk 15:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Cyprus should be listed under Europe, not Asia. It is a European Union state and the Starbucks franchise in the country is owned by the Greek franchise owners. Thank you. Nowplusone (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. I tend to agree with you, but the sourced content at Cyprus#Geography suggests it's not quite as simple as that. I'd like to see consensus for the change. RivertorchFIREWATER 17:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Please delete or edit this
"Starbucks' chairman, Howard Schultz, has talked about making sure growth does not dilute the company's culture[56]" under Corporate Governance. This statement is out of place, newly irrelevant and inaccurate, and currently lacks credibility (the link from 2006 does not provide quality evidence). The rest of this section talks about the governing structure within the company, while this statement stands alone without elaboration. Howard Shultz is no longer the chairman, making this statement inaccurate. Therefore this statement regarding the company's cultural philosophy is no longer relevant. In addition, the link is outdated (2006) while the statement seems to speak in the present (company's culture can change rapidly). The link also does not provide direct credibility for this statement. My wish is for this to be removed or rewritten and moved to a more appropriate location in the article. Everydaycurious (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change these source links back from:
- https://online.wsj.com/article/SB125418430092348015.html
- https://online.wsj.com/article/SB121494400432420449.html
- https://online.wsj.com/article/SB123317714771825681.html
- https://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303902404579148871471212170
To:
- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125418430092348015.html
- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121494400432420449.html
- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123317714771825681.html
- http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303902404579148871471212170
120.72.90.170 (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Your reason being...? JTP (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. We prefer HTTPS. Your change reverts to HTTP, so you're going to need consensus. Izno (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)- Invalid. Links. 2A03:4A80:A:B:B:7173:98A4:73A8 (talk) 03:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not done and not likely to be done' Wall Street Journal articles are behind a paywall. The non-secure versions of these links provide at most a one paragraph lede to the reader, which is not going to help a reader with verification of the claims any better than the version behind the secure link. Wikimedia uses https and links with https are preferred. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- They're currently DEAD LINKS that REDIRECT to LOG IN PAGES! Just HURRY UP and CHANGE them back! 116.74.236.77 (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- They are not dead links and re-directing them to log-in pages is the Journal's right as a commercial entity. Just because they are inconvenient is no reason to change them. The http versions do not supply significantly more information than the https versions and are also mostly paywalled. 18:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, they REDIRECT to log in pages now because of Bender the Bot adding the S in HTTP where it doesn't need to be, and NOW no one can read the articles themselves anymore. Why don't you change them back? 116.74.236.77 (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Asked and answered, more than once. WP:DROPTHESTICK Meters (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Just for documentary purposes: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bender the Bot 8. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- GRRR. NONE OF THE HTTPS LINKS WORK. YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE ME. 156.194.233.191 (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Just for documentary purposes: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bender the Bot 8. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Asked and answered, more than once. WP:DROPTHESTICK Meters (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, they REDIRECT to log in pages now because of Bender the Bot adding the S in HTTP where it doesn't need to be, and NOW no one can read the articles themselves anymore. Why don't you change them back? 116.74.236.77 (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- They are not dead links and re-directing them to log-in pages is the Journal's right as a commercial entity. Just because they are inconvenient is no reason to change them. The http versions do not supply significantly more information than the https versions and are also mostly paywalled. 18:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- They're currently DEAD LINKS that REDIRECT to LOG IN PAGES! Just HURRY UP and CHANGE them back! 116.74.236.77 (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not done and not likely to be done' Wall Street Journal articles are behind a paywall. The non-secure versions of these links provide at most a one paragraph lede to the reader, which is not going to help a reader with verification of the claims any better than the version behind the secure link. Wikimedia uses https and links with https are preferred. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Invalid. Links. 2A03:4A80:A:B:B:7173:98A4:73A8 (talk) 03:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- B-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- B-Class Foodservice articles
- High-importance Foodservice articles
- Foodservice taskforce articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class Washington articles
- High-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- B-Class Seattle articles
- Mid-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press