User talk:S.tollyfield

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	You have really added a lot of great content in Simon Clark (novelist). Also, you have a chance to bring this article to the Main Page. All you have to do is add some more citations, expand the lead and I'll help you nominate it! ΤheQ Editor ^Talk? 22:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wings to the Kingdom (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lor was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wings to the Kingdom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lor^Chat 04:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! S.tollyfield, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lor^Chat 04:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Child Arrangements Programme (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:

How is this notable? Please provide sources that show evidence of notability, not just that it exists. The draft also needs to be cleaned up, focus on the Origin and Purpose section and ignore the various steps and timelines for now. Once you have fixed the notability issues, then you can start to discuss the relevance; why is it important, what existed before this law was created, and what is the impact of it? How does it relate to other nations? Remember to cite sources for any claims made.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Child Arrangements Programme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bjelleklang - talk 18:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Simon Clark (novelist)

On 22 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Simon Clark (novelist), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that British horror novelist Simon Clark wrote a sequel to John Wyndham's The Day of the Triffids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Simon Clark (novelist). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Public Law Outline (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Public Law Outline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Non molestation orders concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Non molestation orders, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wings to the Kingdom concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wings to the Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Public Law Outline concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Public Law Outline, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Public Law Outline

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Public Law Outline".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Public Law Outline}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Hidden.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Hidden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wings to the Kingdom

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wings to the Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Non molestation orders concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Non molestation orders, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Non molestation orders

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Non molestation orders".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Child Arrangements Programme concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Child Arrangements Programme, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Child Arrangements Programme

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Child Arrangements Programme".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Public Law Outline concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Public Law Outline, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Hidden (novel)

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Hidden".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Public Law Outline

Hello, S.tollyfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Public Law Outline".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, S.tollyfield. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Josephine Gillan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josephine Gillan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephine Gillan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephine Gillan. Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of the arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. If your comments concerned a deletion discussion, please consider reading Wikipedia's deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process. We hope that you decide to stay and contribute even more. Everyone is free to reply and comment multiple times in a deletion discussion, but you do not need to add a new vote of keep or delete for each reply. You can simply indent your response using semi-colons(::) at the beginning of the line of your reply. You have posted three keep votes in the discussion two of which you signed as LawTech6. There is no need to continue to do this. WikiVirusC^(talk) 03:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

S.tollyfield, I'm going to ask you politely to explain why you changed your signature in between those !votes. You have not posted signed comments anywhere else on Wikipedia since doing so, so it is difficult to understand why you would be doing this except to create the impression that multiple people are !voting. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I changed my signature I did so because I wanted more anonimity - I had hoped this would change all my previous signatures - clearly it did not. I hope you will leave it at that - but looking at your history I am not optimisticLawTech6 17:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

If you want anonymity, you should change your username. A lot of editors may feel your current sig is problematic per WP:SIGPROB -- it does not link to your user page or user talk page, and it looks like a different username. I am not sure what you mean by "my history", but I would appreciate it if you would refrain from wiki-stalking. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 19:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matt 7: 1-5 LawTech6 05:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)