Jump to content

User talk:Dodger67

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArtFer1 (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 8 August 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thank you!

Thank you so much. I promise not to make a habit of making such requests except in such rare occasions and subjects of preeminent distinction.

Would you agree this article qualifies as B-rated article?  —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk)

11:34:47, 9 July 2017 review of submission by Jazeb786


Hi Jazeb786 the draft still has no references at all, please see the Referencing for beginners guide. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Food desert

I undid your undo on the Food desert page -- I had typed in the wrong wikilink the reference is now on. That is corrected to Food choice of older adults.

I didn't see the 2nd part of your comment before I did this or I would have wrote you first: "driving habits are a relevant factor." I partly addressed this on the article's Talk page previously.

The reference cited concerns the nutritional habits of widows, not the driving habits of women and minorities in food deserts. Since the reference does not support the claim, the claim is unsupported and therefore merits deletion.Skingski (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

Hi Skingski Thanks for getting back to me about it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your undo (Not redundant. The "Transportation" section does not discuss rural distances), information on distance is presented earlier in the page in a section entitled "Distance" -- Food_desert#Distance. In fact, the sentence I deleted is inaccurate: the Distance section enumerates two not one numbers for urban and rural desert distances. Since the definition of distance was already introduced, it is redundant information and should be deleted.Skingski (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

The specific deletion you have made (I fooled myself on which one it was) -- as I said, we already establish distances as a difference between rural and urban deserts. The bottom sentence does not really say anything and the references are not concerned with this topic. Transportation issues are discussed in context of rural deserts in the next section Food_desert#Transportation_barriers_to_food_access. I am torn on how to deal with this section -- I kind of want to have subsections in Transportation barriers for urban and rural/suburban/frontier; but it kind of feels like we should keep the current separate Rural food desert section and if so, move rural transportation there?Skingski (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]
Hi Skingski, I think splitting the transportation issue between urban and rural makes sense. The issues are different; in urban settings issues such as bus routes are prevalent, wheras in rural areas distance is the main problem. Perhaps we should get another opinion or two, ask at WikiProject Food. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, Dodger67. So to be clear, my idea is either:
1). Consolidate transportation info on rural food deserts into a new subsection of "Transportation barriers to food access." -- It sounds like you prefer this option?
OR
2). Have ""Transportation barriers to food access" appear before "Rural food deserts"; then move info specific to rural desert transportation into "Rural food deserts"
So you think this edit decision is important enough to warrant a post on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Food_and_drink?
Thank you for keeping an eye on the article! It gets depressing fixing what started out as a giant unreadable mess IMHO by myself.Skingski (talk) 19:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]
Skingski Yes I think that's the right question to put to the project. My main concern is to get rid of the repetition. I'm off to bed soon, it's getting late at this end. Hopefully there will be a clear consensus by the time I get back in the morning. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Dodger67. Did you see the feedback on the article by Bluerasberry? I am undertaking to follow his suggestions with a new page or two. Let me know Skingski (talk) 15:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]
Hi, Dodger67. I moved nation-specific info to a new page as suggested on WikiProject Food -- Food deserts by country. Everything looks rough right now, but I think things have a better chance to look great. There is so much opinion in the articles which can be weeded out. Let me know what you think should go or stay. Bluerasberry and you have differing opinions on the transpo/rural desert issue. I'll see what I can do with it. Thanks again!Skingski (talk) 00:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]
Hi, Dodger67. Thanks for the review. As for a lead, currently I'm roughly following Prostitution_by_country as a template for this page. If you can suggest another page like this, I would be very grateful! Obviously, I have a lot of work to do on this page... Skingski (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

11:34:47, 9 July 2017 review of submission by Jazeb786

Sir I belong to this village and just want to update the existing data . I do not think that you need other reference please check what I have updated. It is all about my village so i just want to update even you have lot of information missing. Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.211.160.114 (talk) 06:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I have no idea what this is about. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COIN

Please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Gupta_family where I put your name in the template. I'm not making any accusation about you, but you are obviously knowledgable about the articles, and I'm short of time for research right now. Any help appreciated. Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Reflist 2

Hi Dodger, need to add Reflist 2 to this page . If its not on this page the link to the SADF Army history reflist doesn't pull through. Please help. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caracal Rooikat (talk • contribs) 10:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caracal Rooikat I don't understand what you mean. All {{reflist|2}} does is to arrange the references into two columns, but this is deprecated in favour of ratherspecifying the column width (usually 30em) and allowing each reader's screen size to determine how many columns appear. AFAIK there is no way to make reflist carry references over from a different page. A page can also only have one reflist template, extra ones are simply ignored. Exactly which pages are you talking about? Please post links to them. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jmapp01/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Jmapp01/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — fortunavelut luna 15:58, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi you need to inform Jmapp01, not me. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[1] — fortunavelut luna 16:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Dodger67, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You probably need to look at this

You will be very interested in this and may wish to comment there about the upcoming trial. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to comment

on the claims of secrecy surrounding the upcoming trial.You will be very interested in this and may wish to chime in. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding MEDRS

Hello Dodger67, as you may remember, your were kind enough to provide help with [the Local SEO page]. Though this time I am contacting you regarding an entirely different topic: I also occasionally work on the [near death experiences page] and some of my edits were rejected [[2]] because the source I used, "The Handbook of Near-Death Experiences: Thirty Years of Investigation", was deemed non-MEDRS. Now, in the MEDRS policy they clearly state that "academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers" can be used. The above Handbook is from a respected Academic publisher [[3]] I believe, since it is both academic and educational. Also, the authors are some of the best known names in the field of near death experiences: Bruce Greyson, for instance, is either author or co-author on more than 27 publications mostly related to Near Death Experienes (NDEs) in Pubmed. So where is the problem according to you? (did not get an answer from the talk page [[4]] ). Any help and advise is greatly appreciated - best Josezetabal (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Josezetabal I am by no means a specialist on this topic. We do however have a venue for evaluating sources, the Reliable sources noticeboard, discuss the topic there. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dodger67 and thank-you for your kind response - best regards Josezetabal (talk) 07:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20:23:47, 19 July 2017 review of submission by Aprilalsup



Hi Dodger,

Thank you for your message I'm a new comer to wikipedia and you reviewed my page

Here are a few links of reputable sources talking bout Sisyphus the Musical and Im not really sure how I include them in the articles. please advise

http://coloradotheatreguild.dreamhosters.com/?ai1ec_event=sisyphus-the-musical-the-aurora-fox

http://westminsterwindow.com/stories/curtain-time,249081

http://www.aurorasentinel.com/news/preview-sisyphus-musical-aims-endear-myths-morals-free-will-song/

https://www.goldstar.com/events/aurora-co/sisyphus-the-musical-tickets

http://www.fbcdenver.org/blog/weekly-words-6-15-17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aprilalsup (talk • contribs) 20:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aprilalsup, the sources you've listed above are not much use, they are all "coming attractions" announcements and adverts, or in one case a "casting call" in a trade magazine. What you really need are reviews by independent professional critics after the show premiered, published in mainstream media such as newspapers or magazines that have a more than local distribution. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disability in ancient Rome

This article is almost entirely about Rome, not about the empire. Rathfelder (talk) 09:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rathfelder Even so, it still is not about the modern country of Italy. I think a new category "Disability in antiquity" is probably the best solution. It can also contain articles about disability in other old cultures. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see any guidelines about the interface between geography and history, when the same place has been in several countries over time, and practice varies widely. History of disability would be a more useful category - that is notably missing.Rathfelder (talk) 10:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rathfelder Very good idea! Category:History of disability could be subdivided later if needed. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:04:11, 20 July 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by JP1308


Hello Roger! Thank you for your very fast review and thank you very much for your invitation to Teahouse. It is great for a beginner like me, to have support like this. Wish you a beautiful day. JP1308 (talk) 10:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Roger! Thank you very much for your incredible support! I learned a lot from you and I am looking forward to do my next article. I wish you a beautiful day.

Draft:John Maalouf

Hello, Dodger67. You recently commented on my Draftpage: John Maalouf. (My username is Ryanmardini24). You commented that you have "blanked" the talk page. What does that mean? Further, does that indicate that my submission is still in review? As always, I truly appreciate your help, efforts, and advice! All the Best, Ryan.

Ryanmardini24 (talk) 12:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryanmardini24 Please do not undo the blanking of Draft talk:John Maalouf, it is not the correct place for the draft. The actual draft is at Draft:John Maalouf, that is the only page that should contain the draft, work on it there, do not make any more copies anywhere else. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dodger67, my apologies. As you can tell, I am relatively new to this and do not know how to go about navigating where to input the content. For any inconvenience I may have caused, I apologize. Is the new content (the one that is currently in the Draft: John Maalouf in the correct place for submission? Again, sorry and thank you. Ryanmardini24 (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryanmardini24 I have restored the review material, please leave it in place, it will be cleaned up if the draft gets accepted into mainspace. Are you sure you removed the version you meant to? The one you removed was longer than the one you kept. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dodger67: Thank you for your note. Yes, I have included the one I intend to keep. The longer version was not accepted (or so I think) so I made it more concise and to the point, hopefully allowing it to be accepted into the mainspace. Ryanmardini24 (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryanmardini24 actually you need to expand it quite a bit. It's a biography so it should say something abput the subject's birth, childhood, education, career, and personal/family life. It currently reads like an "executive profile" that one would find on a company website, but he was obviously not born a partner of the firm. Most importantly you need to show that he is a notable person by citing articles in mainstream media that discuss him in significant detail. The current content of the draft actually shows that the firm might possibly be notable, rather than himself. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting an info box

Hi, thanks for letting me know how to add a logo to the Wikipedia page. I submitted the article via articles for creation and I'm new here on Wikipedia. Is there a way to request that a more experiences editor create an info box for the Liquidity Services company? Thanks again for your help! NatalieMartin82 (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain dog (disambiguation) ‎

I contested the deletion. And you unila±erally and summarily deleted it. By what procedure was that? I assume this was an oversight on your part. Please correct it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]], I did see your post. I checked for any incoming links from other mainspace pages, there were none, thus it isn't actually disambigating anything, so I went ahead with the deletion. If my reasoning is faulty please let me know how I've gone wrong and I'd be happy to undelete. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I agree the deletion was valid, because per WP:TWODABS it's not necessary to have a dab page for two entries. Primefac (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Trying again to ping User:7&6=thirteen, somehow the template is not working Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's the = in the {{u}}, so you'd have to do {{u|1=7&6=thirteen}}. Primefac (talk) 17:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big issue. I imagine that is as close to a "consensus" we will get on a page that is buried so deep. I simply thought it was a signpost for readers; navigation here is problematical at best. No worries. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

File:New Zealand TW-17.svg Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Request on 12:35:37, 24 July 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Snack-Seedai


Hi Dodger67, Thank you for reviewing the article, I am quiet new to writing in wikipedia, it would be kind of you if you could tell me the mistakes i have made and the corrections to be done to create a perfect wikipedia page. Your suggestion would be of great help. Thank You.


Snack-Seedai (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23:47:46, 25 July 2017 review of submission by Waihekedon


I am not a relative nor do I have any financial or ulterior reason for persisting with this task. I am interested in the history of this person who has a terminal illness. Hence it is certainly not an advertisement. That said, I definitely 'get' what you are saying.

Third party references to verify her life and contributions are used frequently and a few more have been added

She was very active from her 20's as a woman leading from the 'front' in international protests - not very popular with many governments of course. Now we realise in the South Pacific that the residuals of nuclear testing still remain. Rainbow Warriors are considered quite heroic here.

I'm not sure how to re-write this because it is so interwoven with the politics and social fabric of the 1970's Should I remove all of the material under Life and Career?

Many thanks for what must be a very difficult and time consuming task as a volunteer. As a consolation Susi certainly stepped-up in her prime too.

I'm very grateful to both of you! Don

[[5]]

Draft:PFISTERER concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PFISTERER, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10:07:02, 28 July 2017 review of submission by Jennytaylor160


Thank you for reviewing my page! I have spent time today going back through, adding more independent sources, improving the content and references and so would be very grateful if you could let me know if there was anything else you would like me to fix? Thanks, Jenny :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennytaylor160 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jennytaylor160, follow the advice Darylgolden posted on the draft. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ejembi_John_Onah

You recently moved this page to Draft... it's back! --Salimfadhley (talk) 03:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disability in Sri Lanka

I included sport as a heading and wrote the performance of Sri Lanka at the Paralympics and also I would like ask you whether to add the Sri Lanka national blind cricket team and the Sri Lanka national deaf cricket team into the draft Draft:Disability in Sri LankaAbishe (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good start Abishe. I also usually begin with such "easy" information before getting into the more complex stuff such as population data and politics. I presume you will have access to sources in local languages, I can unfortunately only search in English. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - "Dirk Coetsee" / "Coetsenburg"

Hello @Dodger67:,

I just wanted to thank you personally for helping me with my articles. I have also read some of your articles which have really opened my eyes to a number of things that I did not know before. I am still new to editing articles and hope that I get better. Thanks again.Philemon Matilda (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Changes necessary

Dear Rodger (Dodger67), thank you for reviewing my page. Could you please point out any specific parts of the article that helped make your decision? I am looking to create this page with more neutral language so that it can be accepted in the future. Thank you very much.

@Dodger67: ArtFer1 (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&oldid=794519274"