User talk:Kenricklenno2001

Kenricklenno2001, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kenricklenno2001! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kenricklenno2001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Irregular at Magic High School, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Irregular at Magic High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 7, 2017

Your addition to Schoolgirl Strikers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Germudo 1 (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content from your talk page

Wikipedia and your user space are not web hosting services for your fiction. Please save that somewhere else on the web. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I can't re-edit again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenricklenno2001 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kenricklenno2001. I'm not sure if you're asking a question? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 03:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irregular Centrists of Korea!?!?!?

Hi, Someone tagged that as an attack page, but they did not notify you. Not sure how that qualified as WP:CSD#G10, so let me know what's happening.Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding irrelevant tags to Arkanoid vs. Space Invaders!

I appreciate that you are trying to make the Arkanoid vs. Space Invaders article easier to find through tags, however, a lot of the tags that you are placing are incorrect, and I am concerned that you have not played the game before? If this continues on, I may have to report you to a moderator. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. You seem to be making a lot of disruptive edits. Some things to know:

You are not allowed to alter the message of other editors talk page comments, even on your own talk page.
Many of your additions to articles seem...questionable. Please be more careful when adding content to Wikipedia, and collaborate with others when there is a dispute. Work together with others, and actually answer their questions.
I'm not really sure what you're trying to express here, but it doesn't seem WP:CIVIL or helpful for editing.

Please stop doing things like this, or you'll be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 14:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Square Enix - NATO conflict?!

The NATO concerns the Japanese video company Square Enix. It is a big conflict with the video game franchises after Sega's business ending with a sponsorship, such as Schoolgirl Strikers, a mobile app game and Gunslinger Stratos, an arcade game by Taito because of removed 'See also' pages against Arkanoid vs. Space Invaders will be warned by the NATO for the globalization and multiculturalism.

Just kidding about the propagandas. Kenricklenno2001 (talk) 23:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You make no sense. Namcokid47 (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, Wikipedia is not Reddit, 9Gag or 4Chan. You can't just spam articles with drivel just because you find it funny. Moderators are keeping an eye on you, and if you continue on like this, someone will deal harsher sanctions on you. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 21:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@above. The one about Schoolgirl Strikers it had a 'see also'. But if it lists other shows and games, is it related to the page/ article. Like if Schoolgirl Strikers was made into a game and it has enough info to pass as a page/ article.

Then it would be o.k. as with linking it to the t.v. show side part, of the article. Then as it, use to lists other names. Like here, while when the 'Fate' series was placed there, or sword art online among others. etc.. And was taken out/ deleted out. As I brought a question about it. At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Was over looking at a page/ article. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation needed

I'm getting complaints by your behavior again. I must admit, some of your edits completely baffle me. What is the meaning of this edit summary? You add a wiki-link to Warner Bros. on a random anime article, and your edit summary, which is supposed to explain your edit, says Stupid political kingdom for Gordon Manopakorn. What is that supposed to mean? How does that explain that edit?

I'm sorry about that... Kenricklenno2001 (talk) 13:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need a valid explanation on this. I gave you a final warning to stop making disruptive edits. Explain to me how this edit summary was appropriate. Sergecross73 msg me 12:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making strange edits

Mate, I've been keeping an eye out on you and I've had it with you making bizzare, useless and uncivilized edits and edit summaries. I don't know what you are trying to gain from this, but this needs to stop. You have well gone passed the several warnings you have received and I will seriously report you if you keep doing this. Please be civilized when making edits and summaries respectively as none of the information you have provided in the many articles you have edited are true. Namcokid47 (talk) 23:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 06:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is up with you?

You seem to be vandalizing more pages again.

This needs to stop. You've received so many warnings and was blocked for a day but you still vandalise pages. Your antics need to just stop now or I will report you again. Please be civil with your contributions and please stop vandalizing articles. This is your last chance. Namcokid47 (talk) 00:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, repeated tripping of the edit filter, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=stop vandalism}}. Malinaccier (talk) 05:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]