Jump to content

User talk:Praxidicae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has account creator rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
Je suis Coffee
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by M.Jovellanos (talk | contribs) at 19:05, 23 November 2017 (→‎17:43, 23 November 2017 Review submission by M.Jovellanos). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user wishes she was back in Turks and Caicos
But this in no way affects Chrissymad's ability to respond. She just wants everyone to know.

Re: reverted changes to "Berlinette" disambiguation page.

Hello Chrissymad

I noticed that the Berlinette page was reverted. I am planning to create a new page with the content I used in the previous change and am looking for suggestions on an article name. I'm considering "Berlinette (autobody style)". The reason I made the change was that all of the disambiguation links seemed to be to secondary meanings of the word, and I had wanted to assign the basic meaning to the simplest article name. Sorry if I contravened policy.

Kumboloi (talk)

01:21:56, 18 May 2017 review of submission by 96.248.95.183


I've added a lot of references, I hope they are enough. I have been waiting since April 30th, did I do something wrong?

Request to review and publish the page, The_Asian_Age_Bangladesh

Could you please review the page and publish it, since its a daily english newspaper in Bangladesh. It should be at wikipedia page since some users want to know about this newspaper. See asian age at here, https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english , http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper [1][2]Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Asian_Age_Bangladesh


References

  1. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  2. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english

https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english, http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper [1] [2] http://www.bangladeshimedia.com/Bangladeshi-English-Newspaper.html[3] Bangladesh Government official tender notice published at the newspaper,[4][5] [6] [7]


https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english, http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper

[8], [9]

References

  1. ^ http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/
  2. ^ Department of Films & Publications- Bangladesh Government| চলচ্চিত্র ও প্রকাশনা অধিদপ্তর- http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dfp.portal.gov.bcd/page/415b6d7c_437f_4e1e_a541_aa5c33be9d01/List%20of%20Registered%20newspapers%20(March%202017)-%20B.pdf
  3. ^ http://www.bangladeshimedia.com/The-Asian-Age-Bangladesh.html
  4. ^ http://www.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/Tender/ProcurementTender/1/14274/naogaon34_egp.htm
  5. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  6. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  7. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english
  8. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english
  9. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper

08:14:35, 21 May 2017 review of submission by StillEvolving


I have rewritten Draft:Robert_G._Darling completely and I have provided references. Please have a look and let me know if it is OK now - Thanks for the guidance.

Speedy deletion nomination of A Deadly Presence

Please don't delete this page. There is no promotion- I've described what was in the book.

12:47:22, 22 May 2017 review of submission by Suprava Saha



I want to tell you that in my article Saha APPs all the content is true.
If you do not think that it is true or not then see my website https://ssuprava2october20.wixsite.com/suprava-saha
And plz accept it.

02:18:39, 1 June 2017 review of submission by EdwGross


Hi, I now tried to use better sources for the movie - I hope this works better! Please let me know if I should do any further changes. Thank you very much for your help Edward

16:18:02, 13 June 2017 review of submission by Robert twain


Thanks Chrissymad for the review. I added a few lines to the draft to explain better who the subject is and a few more references that are easier to check than printed books. Consider that the subject is known worldwide and very appreciated in the street art context, moreover if you search for "nevercrew" on google is easy to see their actual presence and notability. I also re-read the wikipedia guidelines for notability and for sources, as you suggested, but I'm sure that what I wrote is perfectly in line with them. One of the references I added is the SIK ISEA archive, an official archive where are listed actual swiss artists with description of who they are. Let me know! Thanks!

12:01:54, 14 June 2017 review of submission by 2605:E000:6022:4500:7428:8DEB:E9BB:AA06


I would like a re-review for draft: The Orphan Age because I have added several credible and legitimate sources to the draft page. There are plenty of sources listed on the draft page now that should satisfy for acceptance onto Wikipedia. Thank you 👍

20:47:56, 15 June 2017 review of submission by Hakhond


My article was deleted twice. I would like to know what changes can I make to make it a wiki page. It is called Mind Your Work Thanks


19:08:30, 22 July 2017 review of submission by 97.68.248.132



Hello:

This event has grown to become a public health staple in this little Caribbean island. What changes would you suggest? While some countries like the United States have sporting events like the Super Bowl where the nation gets involved, this just as integrative - touching everyone on our island with direct involvement form the government, people, and tourists that come.

Thank you, Chris

07:22:23, 7 August 2017 review of submission by Freshwater.pr


To know what was exactly wrong as one whole section has been removed. Most sources had been cited. Please let me know what I should write or how to make the article better & have it published.

Freshwater.pr

12:02:24, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Vikas2007shukla




Hello sir,

I am so sorry to past mistakes but currently person have a notabile. i requested ypu to please verify and create article.

13:25:04, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Vikas2007shukla


dear sir , person is notable , he is famous celebrities , could you understand , previous deletion year 2015 , person has not notale, but prasent he is famous indian actor.

13:26:59, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Viktor Paul


Hi Chrissymad, thanks for the feedback. I have done some changes and hope this is the right direction. It is not supposed to be an advertising article from my side! However, if you write something about an artist you likely have a collection of what he/she did which gives it a bit of a advertising feel. But that´s not the intention. Please let me know, if my changes helped or what I can improve more. Thanks a lot! Viktor.

17:14:31, 2 October 2017 review of submission by Charliepeterson123



Hi Chrissymad, I was just wondering what I can do to make my article acceptable? I would really liked to have it published and was hoping you could guide me in the next steps I should take?

Thank you so much

14:03:43, 10 October 2017 review of submission by Radioexperiment


Many thanks for reviewing this. I may have not edited correctly this submission. All the information in this article is 100% true. If you could please suggest the changes to make get this article in place.

Please help review FOSSASIA'S draft and advice on how we could improve on the notability

Hello Chrissymad! As per your latest comment in response to the submission of FOSSASIA's article, I have fix the broken references. It looks like the references section has relevant links and I am clueless what else could be added so that the article becomes more notable than it is currently. Any suggestions, on how I could proceed on this would be super helpful. Thanks! Srishti Sethi (talk)

16:52:06, 25 October 2017 review of submission by Aneesh1989



Hi sir

Dhanu Gowda has played the lead role in an award-winning movie. He deserves to have Wikipedia page. In future people are going to look up him on the internet and I believe that Wiki should be the place to find him. please reconsider as nothing mentioned on the page is a lie or exaggeration.

Thanks in advance Aneesh

Freedom National Insurance Services

Hi Chrissymad. Would you mind sending back this draft back to my sandbox so that I can work on the references a little bit more. I really appreciate your cooperation here for the newbee I am. Thank you. Max-is-max (talk)

Looks like it has already been recreated by the OP (with the original already deleted). Primefac (talk) 16:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Request on 13:10:36, 15 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Lclark


Hi Chrissymad,

Thanks for be so quick with your review. Could you please recommend which bits of the page Draft:Cristina Sánchez-Andrade I should remove or change to be able to pass the Draft test?

(Lclark (talk) 13:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Lclark (talk) 13:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:02:20, 15 November 2017 review of submission by Eboyd42


Hi there, It appears that in order for the Football Power Index page to be created I need to provide additional sources that are not from the source of the idea (ESPN). Are you looking for other views of FPI, comments/criticisms of FPI, or something else? I want to provide as much detail as I can, but there is not much information on the definition of FPI that is outside of ESPN. I am happy to provide any coverage needed, just need a little clarity.

Thanks so much! Evan (eboyd42) Eboyd42 (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know why my article was deleted? what improvements can be done so that it is accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayantarana (talk • contribs) 11:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11:39:47, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Jayantarana


Hi I request a resubmit for my article. can you please let me know why the article got rejected or how I can improve the same so that it can be approved.I have used some notable links. if you ask me, I can remove the ones that you feel are not good enough to add. Please suggest me the changes in details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayantarana (talk • contribs)

Institute for Research on Public Policy, reverted edits

Hello,

You reverted the latest edits done on the IRPP page. These edits were done to reflect the latest publicly available information about the organization and the recent changes to the organization's research program and products. The older version contained errors and information no longer accurate. Please leave the new edits as is. You can even go on the IRPP website to verify.

Thank you

SC

Shirley Cardenas Please review our WP:COI and paid editing policy before continuing to edit. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reviewed your WP:COI and paid editing policy and have added a disclosure to my main user page. Is this sufficient? The edits reflect the latest publically available information. The previous version contains many errors and is outdated. Kindly do not revert the page back. Thank you.

Request on 08:22:15, 17 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by TheresaHeep


Hello Chrissymad,

thank you very much for reviewing my article about Achim Wambach (review date: 10 November 2017)!

Unfortunaltey the article has not been accepted. Therefore, I have a view questions because I would like to improve my submission. You told me, that the references are not quite right yes. Would you mind letting me know me why they are not right yet? I used respective sources for every statement about Achim Wambach, like e.g. recognized newspapers, webpages of government authorities and well known organizations. And I am not quite sure what else to do now.

Thank you very much for your help!

Kind regards, Theresa

TheresaHeep (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

Thank you for patrolling new pages! Thanks for helping out with the backlog. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 04:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:09:04, 22 November 2017 review of submission by IsaNew


Hi Chrissymad, Thank you for reviewing this article. Unfortunately, I don't understand why you think that "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources." I had read the guidelines for referencing thoroughly before submitting the article and cited 7 print media sources (magazines). Why don't you consider these reliable? Or what would I need to change? Thank you in advance for your help, IsaNew (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: VMix

Hello Chrissymad, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of VMix, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not substantially identical to previously deleted version. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 20:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPI clerk trainee

Hi Chrissymad. After discussing this with the functionaries, I'm happy to say you've been accepted as an SPI clerk trainee. Your training will be handled cooperatively by GeneralizationsAreBad, Ivanvector, and myself. KrakatoaKatie may pop in at times to provide perspective from a more experienced CheckUser.

In a moment, I'll be creating a subpage in your userspace at User:Chrissymad/Clerking with a preliminary task. Please feel free to handle it when you have time; I understand it's a holiday. ~ Rob13Talk 14:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We're really glad to have you on board, and look forward to helping you learn the ropes (mixed metaphors, much?) GABgab 15:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralizationsAreBad & BU Rob13 Thanks! I look forward to working with everyone and I'll work on the template/clerking questions today and tomorrow! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:43, 23 November 2017 Review submission by M.Jovellanos

Hi Chrissymad,

As you can see, I'm following all Wikipedia recommendations on the article about Peñalara (software) - which I have added into the discussion. Let's discuss and see what else I can do to make this article worthy of Wikipedia!

(and please feel free to check my editing history in case you want proof that I've been around for 8 years) M.Jovellanos (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&oldid=811756492"