Jump to content

User talk:Jimbo Wales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benjaminikuta (talk | contribs) at 04:55, 28 November 2017 (→‎Why: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Voting open for ArbCom

    Voting has opened for Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017.

    Just in case you need some guidance in voting there are lots of voter guides available, e.g. User:Smallbones/ACE2017 . Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    And don't forget <User:Carrite/ACE2017>. Really now, is canvassing voters' guides here appropriate? Carrite (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    So far they haven't sent talk page notifications to eligible voters this year, but here you get service with a smile :-) Smallbones(smalltalk) 11:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    So far only 107 people have voted. Smallbones(smalltalk) 11:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Full alphabetical list of guides:

    I've gone ahead and just transcluded Template:ACE2017, which contains the list of all the voter guides, among other things, at the top of this thread. Mz7 (talk) 07:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Haven't had one since 2012, time for another? There have been four so far. Maybe in time for Festivus and the other approaching seasonal holidays? Randy Kryn (talk) 17:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm afraid that with the annual fundraiser coming up, several people who visit this page would be unable to complain about the WMF's budget and experience terminal jonesing. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, maybe sometime in 2018. It sounds like a productive (and restful) event. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I was probably too quick to dismiss this. Lots of folks, myself included, would likely benefit from a good break from expressing their opinions. Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    confused face icon Just curious...

    WMF fundraising totals and averages by fiscal year, from [1]

    Has WMF experienced any decrease in monetary contributions based on en.WP's political slant or is everything still on track? Atsme📞📧 23:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    confused face icon Just curious... are you familiar with the logical fallacy of begging the question? In any case, the WMF's fundraising stats are pretty easy to find; I've pasted them here, to the right. How do those data impact your assumptions? MastCell Talk 01:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, MastCell. The impact the data has on me is #1 - a sigh of great relief considering how aggressively I've promoted WP to educators, and #2 - how I have seriously considered establishing a local chapter. It's good for editors to know these stats because it actually does have an impact on one's credibility when promoting the encyclopedia anyone can edit. I will review the stats you've provided to see how I can best apply them in my future presentations. It is also an indication of great potential for lightening the work-load of unpaid volunteers who devote their time and energy into helping make WP the best it can be. Atsme📞📧 01:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Why

    Why does Jimmy invite people to edit his user page, when it wouldn't be appropriate to change his own words? Benjamin (talk) 04:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]