Jump to content

User talk:RHaworth/2018 Oct 01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is an Online Ambassador on the English Wikipedia
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:RHaworth

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paul 012 (talk | contribs) at 14:11, 10 September 2018 (→‎R3 question: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archives

Deletion of the Sonna Rele page

Hello, I'm contacting you regarding the page for the British music artist, Sonna Rele. From the edit history on the page, I can see that the page has been deleted in the past for various reasons - most commonly "unambiguous advertising or promotion" - and that you protected the page from creation on 18 July 2010.

I am not affiliated in any way with Sonna Rele, but from a quick search on Google it seems as if this artist appears to have done considerable and high-profile work since 2010 - most notably working with Disney on the 2015 live-action movie of Cinderella. I wonder if you might re-consider your protection of the page? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amxek (talk • contribs) 17:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Abdul kissing Candice

Mind restoring Draft:Abdul Gani Vakil and Draft:Kissing Candice (band) for me? I did not manage to rescue them quite quick enough. I was halfway through taking a cursory look at the items in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned drafts or AfC submissions when you deleted them. Entirely not your fault, however, but rather a deficiency in the system. G13 should function like PROD, giving interested parties a week to review them. Regards, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Page is protected

Hi, I am trying to add an academic page onto Wikipedia but it has protected it and is not letting me create the page. It said to contact you. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributor2018PS (talk • contribs) 00:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

What Happened

Draft:Vogeti Ramakrishnayya , i had given all the required citations , and made the page very clear and why did you again made it to a draft again , and when will i get this article approved and when will the people be able to see it? — Rushi1122334455 (talk). —Preceding undated comment added 11:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

De Ijazat

Hi Roger, you deleted this page on August 7 and it was re-created a week later. Can you please check for me if there's any resemblance between the two versions? -- Saqib (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Fruiticulture

My page Fruiticulture has been deleted although it has public domain copyrigh!! Any action should i take to be able to publish it again? Thanks, Abdulelah1 (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

User talk:MedECUBE

You may wish to revoke talk page access. -- Cahk (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Request for deletion

I need to request you that please delete page User talk:106.205.152.95 as the criteria of speedy deletion reason as g6 (Asserted to be non-controversial maintenance). We don't need that page. 3 more pages, User talk:106.222.97.229, User talk:122.162.80.48 and User talk:171.50.170.146 were also deleted like this by you. I don't have a Wikipedia account so I need to talk by this IP address. Thank you. 182.77.106.88 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I would be talking to you (RHaworth) when you unprotect that page. Nothing is preventing me from creating an account. I like to be an IP only. So, instead of unprotecting that page, please quickly delete that page (User talk:106.205.152.95) as speedy deletion criteria g6. We don't need that page. Thank you. 182.77.106.88 (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

There are no hundreds of similar. I am just requesting deletion as we don't need that page. I don't want to waste more time on it. Without any further more talk (probably an arguement) about the deletion, please just delete that page (User talk:106.205.152.95) quickly as we don't need it at all. Thank you. 182.77.106.88 (talk) 14:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker). Some admins will delete these superfluous articles with a db|error, some do not, there is no consistency. I am running at about 50/50 and until there are contrary guidelines it must be worth continuing to nominate - probably picking times to avoid certain admins. -- Richhoncho (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

I am from the same IP address (122.162.235.252) who requested deletion for the three pages, User talk:106.222.97.229, User talk:122.162.80.48 and User talk:171.50.170.146. I was going to request to delete User talk:106.205.152.95 but I forgot to request. All the four pages are not needed and three already got deleted. I don't want to waste more time on it. So, please delete the fourth page also (User talk:106.205.152.95) quickly because we don't need that page also at all. — 182.77.106.88 (talk) 05:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Morph (Twenty One Pilots song)

Hi, can you elucidate why you have turned this db down, when other editors have accepted and deleted similar nominations? Might be an idea if admins agreed too. Cheers. NB. I am not asking for a reconsider, just an explanation. -- Richhoncho (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words. Check around, redirects are not cheap if everything gets 3 separate redirects, 2 of which are surplus to the primary redirect. -- Richhoncho (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Families

Hello, re: International Organization for the Family and the World Congress of Families. As far as I can tell, the World Congress of Families WAS a US-based organization that folded itself into a new organization based in Russia. It is difficult to tell what the proper Wikipedia solution to this should be. They both were international organizations, and some leaders from the World Congress of Families ended up working with the International Organization for the Family. But there is very little mainstream coverage of either group that explains what has actually happened. — Chip.berlet (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Babylon.js re-write

I would like to write an article on Babylon.js and it appears that a previous draft article has been deleted by yourself. As I do not know the content of the previous page I do not know whether my contribution will be substantially different or not. If possible would you please be able to provide me with a copy of the content. — JohnK3142 (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for advice, instructions followed. — JohnK3142 (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Dahlby

Hello editor. My rough draft got deleted due to improper copyright issues on my behalf. I was hoping you could restore the page so that I can make corrections to my rough draft. I am learning wikipedia for a course and would like the opportunity to correct my mistakes and learn the proper way to enter information. I would appreciate it very much, but understand if that is not a possibility. Thank you -- Aswieter (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Request to revert the Pranic Healing article

Respected Mr Roger W Haworth Greetings We had edited the article on pranic healing last month. Soon the page had a speedy deletion tag under section G11. 12:20, 14 August 2018 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Pranic healing (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) We have now rewritten the content. As this article page and its talk page aren’t available, could you please revert and allow us to edit the article. Thank you for your timely help, OmAmenAmin 09:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by OmAmenAmin (talk • contribs)

Deletion of page Tami Lancut Leibovitz

Dear User:RHaworth, I'm contacting you referring the deletion of the page:Tami Lancut Leibovitz. I would like to rewrite the page and will be thankful if you could send me the text to the original deleted content so I will be able to modify it so it hopefully comply with the criteria you've listed. (G11 and G12). I've seen that the page is now protected. Please let me know how can I post again the rewritten content. I strongly believe that this article is important and should be on English Wikipedia due to the contribution of the persona in her field. If you have any suggestions on how to improve it I'll be thankful yet again. With best regards, Arielinson (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Global Wireless Solutions

Hello, I have noticed you have deleted the Global Wireless Solutions page. I was a paid contributor for the page and was in discussion with the placer of the tag. My job as a paid contributor was to make the page as encyclopedic as possible and to fit the Wikipedia format entirely. I was working with a number of experienced wikipedia editors to acheive this goal and it was almost entirely completed at the time of your deletion. Global Wireless Solutions was both a credible and significant page. The firm has been leading the benchmarking industry for over 22 years, testing the largest operators around the world. Firms that have driven/tested less miles than us and have been around for fewer years, such as RootMetrics and OpenSignal, have pages that have not been deemed insignificant and not credible. My proposed edits in the talk page were approved by a user that stated I only had one small section left to edit/clean up. A different user, the user who placed the deletion tag, had started making edits on the page that also helped make it non-promotional. I hope you are able to understand that my intentions were solely to make the page non-promotional and completely encyclopedic. I hope there is a way you can restore the page, with all of this in mind. Thank you, Scwiki3 (talk) 18:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

  • The page is not protected so if you really must, you can try again. But submission via AfC might be a better bet. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your feedback. What would be the added benefit in submitting via AfC? Also, if I were to go down that route, what would be the approval process, i.e. would you approve my application and would I propose an improved version of the page that was deleted? Scwiki3 (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Help

Hi I am responding to User_talk:Fanoflionking#Time_wasting can you help me do a bulk deletion of archive 6 onwards please thanks Fanoflionking 15:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:John Sedgwick where can I find the old version?

Hello thank you for pointing out the mistake I made in not proving permission to use materials for John Sedgwick page from his website. Draft:John Sedgwick I see the helpful section on that here. However is there a version of the page that was deleted I can find to resurrect? (once I follow the copyright rules, of course) Thanks. Sopped (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

R3 question

Wondering if there's any reason in particular to keep this? Would G6 (using {{Db-error}}) have been a better criterion to cite? --Paul_012 (talk) 14:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RHaworth/2018_Oct_01&oldid=858918314"