This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.0.113.197(talk) at 10:49, 20 September 2018(added to world sports project). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:49, 20 September 2018 by 88.0.113.197(talk)(added to world sports project)
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. The scope of the tournament for both genders these days covers more than just one category alone, with the Grand Prix series being the highest of multiple in both respects. It's appropriate that the rename gets made to reflect this. GrafVonTirol (talk) 03:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Reliable sources are still calling it the "Grand Prix Series" as far as I can see.[1] And in fact, the picture of the champions at [2] suggests that even the organisers are still calling it that. — Amakuru (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Creating pages and removing red links
If there is anyone who is interested in creating pages, and thereby removing the Red links, for the tournaments within Division A/Trophy (2011, 2012, 2013) and the Division B/Conference 1 (2011, 2012, 2013 North & South, and 2014 North & South) can get all the results from these tournaments HERE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.1.202.203 (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]