Jump to content

Talk:Smallpox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lilchimy (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 20 December 2018 (→‎Number of people killed: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleSmallpox has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 23, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Template:Vital article

Template:WP1.0

Past tense

Opening sentence, shouldn't it be Smallpox was?

Also, an indefinite semiprotection seems unwarranted for the level of vandalism that it was attracting and given good IP contributions at the time. Can we give it another shot please? 220.210.184.229 (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto as per above. Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article alternates back and forth between past and present. SelectSplat (talk) 05:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that until we can confirm that all remaining samples of the virus have been destroyed, the article should be written in the present tense, because while it may eradicated in the larger world, the virus still exists. As long as the virus exists somewhere in the world, there is the potential, even if only a remote one, that it could reescape into the wild. Only when the virus no longer exists could it be considered completely extinct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.233.207.101 (talk) 00:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The past tense comes across as "clever" and pretentious. Smallpox still exists in various places on earth, it's not like it's some thing that happened once in the past. It is a viral disease. – Acdx (talk) 23:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't accept that past tense would be '"clever" and pretentious'. Chris Jefferies (talk) 08:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but much of the article is about symptoms and prognosis, including words like 'usually' - this makes no sende when there are currently no cases of infection. 173.254.200.130 (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I propose converting the article to a consistent past tense. Chris Jefferies (talk) 08:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Organization of the lead

I suggest to follow the flow of the whole article (general intro. & symptoms before causes, diagnosis, prevention, treatments and epidemiology ), as do in many other disease-related articles. Biomedicinal (talk)

If i will need a picture of a disease effect on human i will find it without wikipedia.

Can you please remove NSFW title picture? This is very ugly and inappropriate. All such pictures need to be put in a special section in all ilnesses articles. Thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.34.142.117 (talk) 07:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored. If you do not want to see images, possibly helpful instructions are located here. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about a disease, if people are squeamish about seeing pictures of the effects what are they doing looking looking it up in the first place? Czarnibog (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Smallpox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Would it be practical to have an image of a smallpox sufferer similar to that at the top of the chickenpox article at the top here, and move the other, more graphic, images further down the page? Thus those passing through (eg with the mention of smallpox on today's MP) will be less disconcerted on first coming to the page and skimming the intro - and they then have the choice of going further. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2017

Please read and edit this article for grammar mistakes. The first section has several, such as using "than" instead of "then," and the use of the wrong tense. I would change it myself but I'm not authorized to do so. Thanks. 2601:483:4100:3380:4493:CEF6:BD97:A3DF (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 16:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution under section Cause instead of History?

I was looking for that info, and knew it was in the article (because I wrote part of the section), and considered the evolutionary history to be part of History. Maybe instead of Evolution, the section should be renamed Origin, that makes it clear it's part of History. The 'Cause' of smallpox is the virus as it exists today, or at least has existed for a couple thousand years including diversification in the middle ages. Sbalfour (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under Disease emergence, we have "The earliest credible clinical evidence of smallpox is <some pox disease in 2nd millenium BC in India>." Since the study by Duggan et.al. in 2016 isolating a basal strain of the virus dated ~1650, it's clear that variola has not historically been the virus we consider the causative agent of smallpox today. How sure are we that pre-middleages poxes were smallpox? That basal strain wasn't Variola major or Variola minor. Sbalfour (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalize genus names?

Shouldn't variola major and variola minor in the lead be Variola major and Variola minor? We also have Variola major and Variola minor in the article. Someone should go thru check and fix all of these. MOS: Capitalize scientific names above the rank of species, and italicize them from the rank of genus downward. Sbalfour (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number of people killed

For a book I'm writing I researched the claim that "in the 20th century it is estimated that smallpox resulted in 300–500 million deaths". Wikipedia and newspapers will quote this figure, claiming "one group of experts" or "some experts" estimate this. But I haven't found any single expert actually estimating this. The sources provided in the article are not medical or disease experts, but politics books and the like. And they all claim "it is estimated", they don't include any real estimations.

Still, I think I know where the figure comes from. D. A. Henderson was the guy in charge of smallpox eradication at the WHO. In two separate places he once estimates that in the 20th century 200-300 million people were killed and in the last century of the existence of smallpox 'at least half a billion'.

  • 1st figure is in Donald A. Henderson, “Smallpox Eradication,” in Microbe Hunters - Then and Now, ed. M. D. Hilary Koprowski and M. D. Michael B. A. Oldstone, 1 edition (Bloomington, Ill: Medi-Ed Pr, 1996), 39.
  • 2nd figure is in D. A. Henderson and Richard Preston, Smallpox: The Death of a Disease - The Inside Story of Eradicating a Worldwide Killer, 1st edition (Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books, 2009).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Smallpox&oldid=874626090"