Jump to content

Vaquita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reo On (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 16 July 2019 (→‎Primary threats: links to three fishing villages primarily involved in the totoaba fishery and so in the mortality of the vaquitas (Golfo de Santa Clara has no it's own article)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vaquita
Temporal range: Holocene
↓
[1]
Size compared to an average human
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Infraorder: Cetacea
Family: Phocoenidae
Genus: Phocoena
Species:
P. sinus
Binomial name
Phocoena sinus
Vaquita range

The vaquita (Spanish: [baˈkita]; Phocoena sinus) is a species of porpoise endemic to the northern part of the Gulf of California that is on the brink of extinction. Based on beached skulls found in 1950 and 1951, the scientific description of the species was published in 1958.[3] The word vaquita is Spanish for "little cow". Other names include cochito (Spanish for "little pig"), desert porpoise, vaquita porpoise, Gulf of California harbor porpoise, Gulf of California porpoise, and gulf porpoise. Since the baiji (Yangtze River dolphin, Lipotes vexillifer) is thought to have gone extinct in 2006,[4] the vaquita has taken on the title of the most endangered cetacean in the world.[5] It has been listed as critically endangered since 1996.[2] The population was estimated at 600 in 1997,[2] below 100 in 2014,[6][7] approximately 60 in 2015,[8] around 30 in November 2016,[9][10] and only 12-15 in March 2018,[11] leading to the conclusion that the species will soon be extinct unless drastic action is taken.[12] An estimate released in March 2019, based on acoustic data gathered in the summer of 2018, is that a maximum of 22 and a minimum of 6 vaquita porpoises remain, with the IUCN supporting roughly about 10 individuals.[13][14][15]

The population decrease is largely attributed to bycatch from the illegal gillnet fishery for the totoaba, a similarly sized endemic drum that is also critically endangered.[9][16][17] The population decline has occurred despite an investment of tens of millions of dollars by the Mexican government in efforts to eliminate the bycatch.[10] A partial gillnet ban was put in place for two years in May 2015; its scheduled expiration at the end of May 2017 spurred a campaign to have it extended and strengthened.[12] On 7 June 2017, an agreement was announced by Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto to make the gillnet ban permanent and strengthen enforcement. As well as the Mexican government and various environmental organizations, this effort will now also involve the foundations of Mexican businessman Carlos Slim and American actor and environmental activist Leonardo DiCaprio.[18]

A protective housing/captive breeding program, unprecedented for a marine mammal, has been developed and is undergoing feasibility testing, being now viewed as necessary to rescue the species.[9][10][16][19][20] However, the sea pen housing needed to implement this strategy is not expected to be available until October 2017,[10][16] which is feared may be too late. Additionally, the ability of the vaquita to survive and reproduce while confined to a sanctuary is uncertain.[21] The Mexican government approved the plan on 3 April 2017, with commencement projected to begin in October 2017.[22] In November 2017, the attempt to capture wild vaquitas for captive breeding and safekeeping was suspended following the death of a female vaquita. The adult female died within hours of being captured.[23][24] In December 2017, Mexico, the United States and China agreed to take further steps to prevent trade in totoaba bladders.[25] Despite its extremely low population, reports indicate the small number of surviving vaquita are still relatively healthy and able to breed.[14] However, the intensifying poaching and the extremely low population make it likely that the species will go extinct unless drastic measures are taken.[11] If the species does go extinct, it will likely be the first cetacean to do so since the baiji.

Description

Vaquitas are the smallest and most endangered species of the infraorder Cetacea and are endemic to the northern end of the Gulf of California. The vaquita is somewhat stocky and has a characteristic porpoise shape. The species is distinguishable by the dark rings surrounding their eyes, patches on their lips, and a line that extends from their dorsal fins to their mouths. Their backs are a dark grey that fades to white undersides. As vaquitas mature, the shades of grey lighten.[26] Female vaquitas tend to grow larger than males.[26] On average, females mature to a length of 140.6 cm (55.4 in), compared to 134.9 cm (53.1 in) for males. The lifespan, pattern of growth, seasonal reproduction, and testes size of the vaquita are all similar to that of the harbour porpoise.[27] The flippers are proportionately larger than those of other porpoises, and the fin is taller and more falcated. The skull is smaller and the rostrum is shorter and broader than in other members of the genus.

Taxonomy

The porpoise genus Phocoena comprises four species, all of which inhabit coastal waters, two each in the northern and southern hemispheres. Vaquitas are believed on the basis of morphological and genetic evidence to be most closely related to Burmeister's porpoise (P. spinipinnis) of South America. Their ancestors are thought to have crossed the equator during a cooler period of the Pleistocene.[3]

Behavior

Vaquitas use high-pitched sounds to communicate with one another and for echolocation to navigate through their habitats. They generally feed and swim at a leisurely pace. Vaquitas avoid boats and are very evasive. They rise to breathe with a slow, forward motion and then disappear quickly. This lack of activity at the surface makes them difficult to observe.[28] Vaquitas are usually alone unless they are accompanied by a calf,[29] meaning they are less social than other porpoise species. They may also be more competitive during mating season.[30] They are the only species belonging to the porpoise family that live in warm waters.[31] Vaquitas are non-selective predators.[32]

Schooling

Like other Phocoena, vaquitas are usually seen singly. If they are seen together, it is usually in small groups of two or three individuals.[26] Less often, groups around ten have been observed, with the most ever seen at once being 40 individuals.[citation needed]

Diet

Vaquitas tend to forage near lagoons.[26] All of the 17 fish species found in vaquita stomachs can be classified as demersal and or benthic species inhabiting relatively shallow water in the upper Gulf of California. Vaquitas appear to be rather non-selective feeders on crustaceans, small fish, octopuses and squid in this area.[2][28] Some of the most common prey are teleosts (fish with bony skeletons) such as grunts, croakers, and sea trout.[33] Like other cetaceans, vaquitas may use echolocation to locate prey,[34] particularly as their habitat is often turbid.[2]

Life cycle and reproduction

Vaquita pair

Little is known about the life cycle of vaquitas. Age at sexual maturity, longevity, reproductive cycle and population dynamics estimates have been made, but further research is needed. Most of these estimates come from vaquitas that have been stranded or caught in nets. Some are based on other porpoise species similar to vaquitas.

Vaquitas are estimated to live about 20 years in ideal conditions.[35][36] They mature sexually at 1.3 m long, as early as 3 years old, but more likely at 6. Reproduction occurs during late spring or early summer. Their gestation period is between 10 and 11 months. They have seasonal reproduction, and usually have one calf in March. The inter-birth period, or elapsed time between offspring birth, is between 1 and 2 years. The young are then nursed for about 6 to 8 months until they are capable of fending for themselves.[37]

Distribution and habitat

The habitat of the vaquita is restricted to the northern area of the Gulf of California, or Sea of Cortez.[38] They live in shallow, murky lagoons along shorelines. They rarely swim deeper than 30 m (100 ft) and are known to survive in lagoons so shallow that their backs protrude above the surface. The vaquita is most often sighted in water 11 to 50 m (36 to 160 ft) deep, 11 to 25 km (6.8 to 16 mi) from the coast, over silt and clay bottoms. They tend to choose habitats with turbid waters, because they have high nutrient content,[2] which is important because it attracts the small fish, squid, and crustaceans on which they feed. They are able to withstand the significant temperature fluctuations characteristic of shallow, turbid waters and lagoons.

Conservation

The vaquita is considered the most endangered of 129 extant marine mammal species.[39] It has been classified as one of the top 100 evolutionary distinct and globally endangered (EDGE) mammals in the world.[26] The vaquita is an evolutionarily distinct animal and has no close relatives. These animals represent more, proportionally, of the tree of life than other species, meaning they are top priority for conservation campaigns. The EDGE of Existence Programme is a conservation effort that attempts to help conserve endangered animals that represent large portions of their evolutionary trees. The U.S. government has listed the vaquita as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. It is also listed by the IUCN and the CITES in the category at most critical risk of extinction.

Population decline

A vaquita swims in the foreground while fishing boats ply their trade in the distance.

Vaquitas have never been hunted directly, but their population is declining, largely because of animals becoming trapped in illegal gillnets intended for capturing the totoaba, a large critically endangered fish of the drum family endemic to the Gulf. A trade in totoaba swim bladders has arisen, driven by demand from China (where they are used in soup, being considered a delicacy and also erroneously thought to have medicinal value[16]), which is greatly exacerbating the problem.[6][7]

Estimates placed the vaquita population at 567 in 1997.[38] Estimates in the 2000s ranged between 150[40][41] to 300.[41]

With their population dropping as low as 85 individuals in 2014,[42] inbreeding depression has probably begun to affect the fitness of the species, potentially contributing to the population's further decline.[43]

In 2014, estimates of the species' abundance dropped below 100 individuals.[6] An international vaquita recovery team concluded that the population is decreasing at a rate of 18.5% per year, and "the species will soon be extinct unless drastic steps are taken immediately."[7] Their report recommended that a ban on gillnet fishing be enforced throughout the range of the vaquita, that action be taken to eliminate the illegal fishery for the totoaba, and that with help from the U.S. and China, trade in totoaba swim bladders be halted.[6][7]

On 16 April 2015, Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, announced a program to conserve and protect the vaquita and the similar-sized totoaba, including a two-year ban on gillnet fishing in the area, patrols by the Mexican Navy and financial support to fishermen impacted by the plan.[44][45] However, some commentators believe the measures fall short of what is needed to ensure the species' survival.[46]

In early May 2016, the IUCN SSC – Cetacean Specialist Group reported that the vaquita population had dipped to around 60 remaining individuals in 2015. This represents a 92% decline from the 1997 population level. In March 2016 alone, at least three vaquitas drowned after being entangled in gillnets set for totoaba.[8] The report concluded that the gillnet ban would need to be extended indefinitely, with more effective enforcement, if the vaquita is to have any chance of long term survival. Otherwise, the species is likely to become extinct within 5 years.[8]

By November 2016, according to a report released in February 2017, the population had declined to about 30, and it was judged that capture of some of the remaining vaquitas and conducting a captive breeding program within a secure sanctuary was the only remaining hope for survival.[9][10] This is despite the fact that porpoises generally fare poorly in captivity.[21] However, the head of the Mexican environmental agency asserted in July 2017 that at least 100 individuals remain.[47]

By March 2018, an interview with the watchdog group Elephant Action League revealed that based on recordings of vaquita calls from multiple sources, there were likely only a dozen remaining vaquita in the region. According to the interview, despite the recent efforts to curb poaching, dozens of poachers have still been seen fishing every night. It remains unlikely that the population will survive the next totoaba fishing season, which began around the same time the interview was released.[11] In response to the endangerment of the vaquita, a federal judge ordered President Donald Trump to ban the import of gillnet-harvested seafood from the Gulf of California into the United States later in the year.[48]

A survey later in 2018 sighted 6-7 vaquita, possibly about half of the species' current population. However, renewing hopes for the species was the sighting of "Ana", a female vaquita previously seen with a newborn calf in 2017. "Ana" was also seen with another calf in the 2018 survey, indicating that the small population still has the ability to sustain itself, and that the reproduction rate of the species may be annual rather than biennial as thought before. However, acoustic studies have indicated that only about 15 individuals still exist in a very small rectangular area about 19 by 40 km (12 by 25 mi); a reduction of about 86% of the species' historic range.[48][49]

A 2019 survey found a badly-decomposed vaquita corpse, likely one of the handful remaining, caught in a gillnet, indicating that the species is still at risk from gillnets even despite its very small population.[14]

Primary threats

Vaquitas have dark eye rings.

Accidental drowning in gillnets set by fishermen meant for catching totoaba is the primary cause of anthropogenic, incidental mortality for the vaquita. Three fishing villages in the northern Gulf of California are primarily involved in the totoaba fishery and, as a result, most directly involved in threats to the vaquita. San Felipe, in Baja California, and Golfo de Santa Clara and Puerto Peñasco, in Sonora, have a total population of approximately 61,000. Up to 80% of the economy in these towns is associated with the fishing industry. A total of 1771 vessels make up the artisanal fleet that have permits to fish with nets, with the total size of the commercial fishery unknown due to the extent of the black market for totoaba.[50] Around 3,000 individuals are involved in the totoaba industry overall.[51] The total economic impact of the industry for the region is estimated to be approximately US$5.4 million annually, or $78.5 million Pesos. Socioeconomic surveys of the northern Gulf have suggested that approximately $25 million, if invested in the region through education, equipment buyout, and job placement, could end the vaquita bycatch problem.[51]

Studies performed in El Golfo de Santa Clara, one of the three major ports in which vaquitas live, indicated that gillnet fishing caused about 39 vaquita deaths a year in the late 1990s. This was close to 17% of the whole vaquita population within this port. While these results were not taken from the entire range of habitat in which vaquitas live, it is reasonable to assume that these results can be applied to the whole vaquita population, and in fact may even be a little low.[52] Even with a gillnet ban throughout the vaquita refuge area, which contains 50% of the vaquita's habitat, the population is still in decline, which suggests a complete ban of gillnet use may be the only solution to saving the vaquita population.[53] However, even in the face of all-encompassing gillnet bans, a significant number of Mexican fishermen in El Golfo de Santa Clara continue to use the nets. As many as a third of the area's fishermen are thought to still be using gillnets despite the imposition of bans on their use.[54] Trawl nets commonly used to catch shrimp in the area may also present threats due to their impacts on the Gulf's ecosystem, either directly through bycatch or by indirectly altering the seafloor and associated species (including vaquita prey).[55]

Other potential threats to the vaquita population include habitat alterations and pollutants. The habitat of the vaquita is small and the food supply in marine environments is affected by water quality and nutrient levels. The damming of the upper Colorado River has reduced the flow of fresh water into the gulf, though there is no empirical evidence that the reduced flow from the Upper Colorado River has posed an immediate short-term risk to the species.[55] In addition, the use of chlorinated pesticides may also have a detrimental effect. Despite these possible problems, most of the recovered bodies of vaquitas show no signs of emaciation or environmental stressors,[35] implying that the decline is due almost solely to bycatch. However, these additional hazards may pose a long-term threat.

A 2018 interview indicated that the illegal fishermen may be waiting for the species to go extinct in order to fish with fewer restrictions.[11]

Secondary impact of declining numbers

Though the major cause of vaquita porpoise mortality is bycatch in gillnets, as numbers continue to dwindle, new problems will arise that will tend to make recovery more difficult. One such problem is reduced breeding rates. With fewer individuals in the habitat, less contact will occur between the sexes and consequently less reproduction. This may be followed by increased inbreeding and reduced genetic variability in the gene pool, following the bottleneck effect.

When inbreeding depression occurs, the population experiences reduced fitness because deleterious recessive genes can manifest in the population. In small populations where genetic variability is low, individuals are more genetically similar. When the genomes of mating pairs are more similar, recessive traits appear more often in offspring. The more related two individuals are in the breeding pair, the more deleterious homozygous genes the offspring will likely have which can greatly lower fitness in the offspring.[56] These secondary impacts of dwindling vaquita numbers are not necessarily a threat yet, but they will become problematic if the population continues to decline.[57] In addition, because porpoise population growth rates are generally low, the vaquita population is unlikely to recover rapidly even after the removal of anthropogenic risk factors to their survival. By some estimates, the maximum potential growth rate for the species is under 4%.[55] However, the sighting of a female with a newborn calf in 2017 and the same female with another newborn in 2018 indicates that the species may have a relatively faster annual growth rate.[48]

Ecological consequences

Removal of the vaquita will have a significant ecological impact on the northern Gulf of California. The Gulf of California is considered a large marine ecosystem, due to its high species diversity and large habitat size.[58] With such biodiversity in the region, it is important to consider the potentially harmful effects of drops in the vaquita population on seemingly unrelated species due to apparent competition.

Sharks have been determined to be the only predators of vaquitas. Because of its limited number of predator species, the vaquita population is sensitive to small changes in predation from sharks.[58] Although the vaquita accounts for only a small percentage of the diets of sharks in the region, extinction of the vaquita could potentially cause negative effects on shark population sizes. Extinction of the vaquita may also impact the vaquita prey populations in the northern Gulf ecosystem. The disappearance of the vaquita could lead to potential over-population of their prey species such as benthic fishes, squid, and crustaceans.[35]

Conservation efforts for the vaquita are mainly focused on fishing restrictions to prevent their bycatch. These fishing restrictions could prove beneficial for the fish in the upper Gulf, as well as the vaquita. As a result of increased restrictions on gillnet use, the populations of the targeted fish and shrimp species will receive protection from overfishing.[59] Historically, numerous commercially fished species have experienced devastating impacts due to overfishing, and the vaquita conservation program may lessen the severity of such devastation in the future.[59] Another solution to prevent vaquita bycatch might be to redesign fishing nets, which could be used to effectively catch fish, but leave the vaquita untouched.

Recovery efforts

Because vaquitas are endemic to the Gulf of California, Mexico is leading conservation efforts with the creation of the International Committee for the Recovery of the Vaquita (CIRVA), which has tried to prevent the accidental deaths of vaquitas by outlawing the use of fishing nets within the vaquita's habitat.[26] CIRVA has worked with the CITES, the ESA, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act to make a plan to nurse the vaquita population back to a point at which they can sustain themselves.[28] CIRVA concluded in 2000 that between 39 and 84 individuals were killed annually by such gillnets. To try to prevent extinction, the Mexican government has created a nature reserve covering the upper part of the Gulf of California and the Colorado River delta. CIRVA recommends that this reserve be extended southwards to cover the full known area of the vaquita's range and that trawlers be completely banned from the reserve area.

On 28 October 2008, Canada, Mexico, and the United States launched the North American Conservation Action Plan (NACAP) for the vaquita, under the jurisdiction of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, a NAFTA environmental organization.[60] The NACAP is a strategy to support Mexico's efforts to recover the vaquita. Also in 2008, Mexico launched the program PACE-VAQUITA, another effort to help preserve the species. PACE-VAQUITA compensates fishermen who choose one of three alternatives: rent-out, switch-out, and buy-out.

In the rent-out option, fishermen acquire temporary contractual obligations to carry out conservation efforts. They are paid if they agree to terminate their fishing inside the vaquita refuge area. There is a penalty if fishermen breach the contract which includes getting their vessels taken by the government. The switch-out option provides fishermen with compensation for switching to vaquita-safe harvesting technology. Finally, the buy-back program compensates fisherman for permanently turning in their fishing permits, as well as their respective gear.[61] In 2008, because of how few fisherman were enrolling in the switch-out option, PACE Vaquita added a yearly, short-term option for fishermen, letting them simply rent the vaquita-safe fishing equipment yearly for compensation. Then, in 2010, this option was broken down even further, giving fishermen the option of buying the vaquita-safe net, or paying the yearly rent, but for less compensation.[36] Despite these efforts, the probability that these attempts at conservation will work is slim. Only about a third of fishermen in the area have accepted these terms so far. Some fishermen continue to fish in the protected areas despite the economic alternatives. Even measuring the population size of the vaquita will be difficult as the rarity of the vaquita bycatch will make it difficult to demonstrate the difference these programs are making.[61]

In November 2014, Greenpeace UK launched a campaign urging its members to write to President Peña Nieto to extend the vaquita reserve to the full range of the species, as well as commence dialogue with the Chinese and US over the commercial transport and consumption of products from species that threaten the vaquita's future, such as the similarly sized totoaba fish which is used in Chinese medicine.[62]

In May 2015 Mexico authorized an emergency partial gillnet ban (which did not extend to the legal fishery for the curvina, Cynoscion othonopterus) in the area of the vaquita's habitat, in an attempt to halt the decline in population. In December 2015, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society launched Operation Milagro, a direct action campaign to patrol the gulf habitat to protect the endangered vaquita. Sea Shepherd partnered with the Mexican Navy in a joint effort to remove illegal nets, release trapped wildlife, obtain visual evidence of poaching in the area and conduct outreach with local communities and marine biologists.[63] In the fall of 2016, a new international program to locate and remove illegal or abandoned fishing gear from the vaquita's range began work, finding 31 illegal gillnets in 15 days.[10] On April 8, 2017, Sea Shepherd pulled its 200th gillnet from Mexican waters since the start of Operation Milagro III in December 2016.[64]

Unfortunately, the gillnet ban seems to have disproportionately impacted legal fisheries, and had the unintended effect of pushing more local fishermen into the illegal totaoba fishery. This was exacerbated by problems with the program intended to compensate fishermen for the economic consequences of the ban; half of those funds were given to just a few individuals, while others received nothing.[65] This led to the annual rate of population decline increasing from ~34% before the ban to ~50% in the first year afterwards.[66]

Since these measures failed to halt the decline, by February 2017 it was judged that a program placing a portion of the remaining population in protective captivity was needed to save the species. Additional measures considered necessary were extending a permanent gillnet ban to the legal curvina fishery (which can provide cover for the illegal totoaba fishery), improving the enforcement of fisheries regulations and increasing penalties for violations, and accelerated development of alternative, vaquita-friendly fishing gear for local fishermen.[10] The gillnet ban was scheduled to expire at the end of May 2017; as that date approached, a campaign among conservationists to extend the ban gathered force on social media, with celebrities getting involved.[12]

On 7 June 2017, it was announced by President Peña Nieto that the gillnet ban would be extended and made permanent.[18][67] There will also be newly strengthened efforts to enforce the ban and prosecute violators. To discourage skirting the rules, fishing at night will be prohibited and monitored entry and exit points will be established for fishing vessels that operate in the protected zone. The agreement was signed by the president as well as the Mexican secretaries for the environment, agriculture and navy. The foundations of Mexican businessman Carlos Slim and American actor and environmental activist Leonardo DiCaprio also pledged to support implementation of the plan.[18]

While the permanent ban and increased fishing regulations, if properly enforced, will help preserve the vaquita population, they do not resolve the economic situation. The fishermen may rely on solely this business to make a living. The regulations do not address the traditions and livelihoods of the community that is dependent on fishing. Programs are needed that educate members of the community about conservation and facilitate economic diversification. Conservation groups have contributed to the rise of ecotourism around the world, as it is an immersive way to educate the public about conservation of endangered species and expose visitors to their natural habitat that also faces imminent threat. However, a decreased reliance on fish consumption altogether will have the greatest impact on the vaquitas and other endangered species threatened by the risk of bycatch.[68]

The proposal for a captive breeding program must contend with the general greater difficulty of keeping porpoises in captivity relative to dolphins, due to porpoises' sensitivity to disturbance and stress.[69] Success in keeping captive porpoises has only been attained in recent years.[69] The scheme involves the use of trained dolphins of the U.S. Navy to locate the vaquitas, along with aircraft and a spotter vessel with an observation tower. Vaquitas would be captured with a light salmon gillnet.[16][70] Some of these vaquitas might be satellite-tagged and released for research purposes, while others would be kept captive. The latter vaquitas would be transferred to sea pens along the shore of the gulf, with large pools on land also available for special care if needed. Once success was attained in the campaign to eliminate the threat of gillnets, captive vaquitas could then be released back into the wild.[10]

This program, called VaquitaCPR (Vaquita Conservation, Protection, and Recovery), began capturing vaquitas from the Gulf in autumn of 2017. However, the initial two attempts resulted in the death of one vaquita.[71][72] On 6 November 2017, Mexico's environmental minister announced that a female vaquita had been successfully captured and brought to an enclosure, but had died several hours later, evidently due to stress.[73] The breeding program was closed soon after, and in February 2018, a program conceived in 2017 was funded, which would breed totoaba in three dedicated fish farms to reduce the size of the totoaba black market and thus decrease accidental vaquita killings.[74][75][76]

Recovery efforts have been deemed very slow and inadequate, with large amounts of poaching still going on, reducing the population to one dozen. Sea Shepherd and Elephant Action League are apparently the only organizations to have a constant presence in monitoring the population.[11]

Based on the extremely small range the species has been reduced to as of 2018, it may actually become easier to conserve the remaining population, although this restricted range makes it more vulnerable to illegal fishing in the case of incursion into this area. Potential suggestions to conserve the species include stationing a permanent military vessel in the area or forming a floating barrier of above-water nets to prevent illegal fishing boats from such incursions. Experts have also called on Mexico's incoming president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, to put forth policies conserving the species. However, Obrador's plans for job-creation (likely including promotion of the fishing industry) may debase efforts to protect the species, and Josefa González, Obrador's pick for the Environment Department, has implied that she sees vaquita conservation as a lost cause.[49]

On 1 February 2019, Sea Shepherd reported that one of its boats patrolling the area to remove and deter the setting of illegal nets had been attacked by fishing boats for the second time in a month.[77] It has also been reported that the efforts of the Mexican navy to deter illegal fishing have not been successful; the fishermen intimidate the navy by ramming their boats and while the navy has given chase they have not responded with force. Some fishermen are apparently becoming desperate because they have found it necessary to borrow money from trafficking cartels to replace their illegal nets. [13] On 13 March 2019 it was announced that around 10 vaquitas were left, after Sea Shepherd found one of the porpoises had drowned in a gillnet, which was likely set out for totoaba fish.[78] A possible recovery was not ruled out, as calves are still seen.

See also

References

This article incorporates text from the ARKive fact-file "Vaquita" under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GFDL.

  1. ^ Fossilworks Database. "Fossilworks". Fossilworks Gateway to paleotology. John Alory. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Rojas-Bracho, L.; Taylor, B.L. (2017). "Phocoena sinus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017: e.T17028A50370296. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T17028A50370296.en. Retrieved 18 February 2019. (previous version)
  3. ^ a b "Vaquita Fact Sheet" (PDF). NOAA Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center. Retrieved 30 June 2018.
  4. ^ Turvey, S. T.; Brandon, J. R.; Richlen, M.; Pusser, L. T.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Z.; Wang, K.; Stewart, B. S.; Reeves, R. R.; Zhao, X.; Barrett, L. A.; Akamatsu, T.; Barlow, J.; Taylor, B. L.; Pitman, R. L.; Wang, D. (22 October 2007). "First human-caused extinction of a cetacean species?". Biology Letters. 3 (5): 537–540. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0292. PMC 2391192. PMID 17686754.
  5. ^ Jaramillo-Legorreta, A.; Rojas-Bracho, L.; Brownell, R. L.; Read, A. J.; Reeves, R. R.; Ralls, K.; Taylor, B. L. (15 November 2007). "Saving the vaquita: immediate action, not more data". Conservation Biology. 21 (6): 1653–1655. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00825.x. PMID 18173491.
  6. ^ a b c d Johnson, Chris (3 August 2014). "Report: Vaquita population declines to less than 100". Vaquita: Last Chance for the Desert Porpoise. earthOcean. Archived from the original on 12 August 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
  7. ^ a b c d Report of the Fifth Meeting of the Comité Internacional para la Recuperación de la Vaquita (PDF). Ensenada, Baja California: Comité Internacional para la Recuperación de la Vaquita (CIRVA). 3 August 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 August 2014. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  8. ^ a b c Sanders, Natalie (14 May 2016). "Stronger protection needed to prevent imminent extinction of Mexican porpoise vaquita, new survey finds". www.iucn-csg.org. IUCN Species Survival Commission. Retrieved 16 May 2016.
  9. ^ a b c d Braulik, G. (2 February 2017). "Jan 2017 update on the decline of the Vaquita". IUCN SSC – Cetacean Specialist Group. IUCN. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h "Eighth Meeting of the Comité Internacional para la Recuperación de la Vaquita (CIRVA-8) Southwest Fisheries Science Center" (PDF). IUCN. International Committee for Recovery of the Vaquita. 1 February 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  11. ^ a b c d e "Only 12 vaquita porpoises remain, watchdog group reports". news.mongabay.com. Mongabay. 8 March 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  12. ^ a b c McGrath, Matt (16 May 2017). "Rare Mexican porpoise faces 'imminent extinction'". BBC. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
  13. ^ a b "Just 22 vaquita porpoises remain and illegal gillnets could soon wipe them out". Mexico News Daily. 7 March 2019. Archived from the original on 14 March 2019. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  14. ^ a b c "One of About 10 Endangered Vaquitas Found Dead in Mexico". Time. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  15. ^ "Report: Only Ten Vaquita Left". The Maritime Executive. 16 March 2019. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  16. ^ a b c d e Morell, V. (1 February 2017). "World's most endangered marine mammal down to 30 individuals". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aal0692.
  17. ^ Joyce, C. (9 February 2016). "Chinese Taste For Fish Bladder Threatens Rare Porpoise In Mexico". National Public Radio. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  18. ^ a b c Dibble, S. (7 June 2017). "Mexican billionaire and actor Leonardo DiCaprio join effort to save vaquita porpoise". San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  19. ^ Goldfarb, B. (29 July 2016). "Scientists mull a risky strategy to save world's most endangered porpoise". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aag0706.
  20. ^ "The vaquita porpoise is on the verge of extinction. Please help us save them". National Marine Mammal Foundation. Consortium for Vaquita Conservation, Protection and Recovery. February 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  21. ^ a b Greenpeace (2 February 2017). "Vaquita on Brink of Extinction, Only 30 Remain in the Wild". EcoWatc. Retrieved 4 February 2017.
  22. ^ Nicholls, H. (7 April 2017). "Last-ditch attempt to save world's most endangered porpoise gets go-ahead". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21791.
  23. ^ Gotfredson, David (8 November 2017). "Vaquita porpoise capture operations end on Sea of Cortez". CBS 8. San Diego, CA. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  24. ^ Pennisi, E. (17 November 2017). "After failed rescue effort, rare porpoise in extreme peril". Science. 358 (6365): 851. doi:10.1126/science.358.6365.851. PMID 29146787.
  25. ^ Carver, E. (12 December 2017). "CITES rejects Madagascar's bid to sell rosewood and ebony stockpiles". news.Mongabay.com. Mongabay.org. p. (see end of article). Retrieved 14 December 2017.
  26. ^ a b c d e f Barlow, J. (2014). "Vaquita (Phocoena sinus)". EDGE of Existence programme. Zoological Society of London. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  27. ^ Hohn, A. A.; Read, A. J.; Fernandez, S.; Vidal, O.; Findley, L. T. (June 1996). "Life history of the vaquita, Phocoena sinus (Phocoenidae, Cetacea)". Journal of Zoology. 239 (2): 235–251. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05450.x.
  28. ^ a b c "Vaquita / Gulf of California Harbor Porpoise / Cochito (Phocoena sinus)". Species Information. NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources. 8 July 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  29. ^ "About the Vaquita". Save The Vaquita Project. January 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  30. ^ "Vaquitas, Phocoena sinus". MarineBio.org. MarineBio Conservation Society. 14 January 2013. Archived from the original on 13 September 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ "Basic Facts About Vaquitas". Wild Places and Wildlife. Defenders of Wildlife. 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  32. ^ Rojas-Bracho, L. "Vaquita (P. sinus)". Species fact Sheets. Society for Marine Mammalogy. Archived from the original on 7 November 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  33. ^ Rice, Danielle (2 May 2011). "About the Vaquita: An Endangered Animal". Vaquita: An Endangered Species. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  34. ^ Silber, G. K. (1991). "Acoustic signals of the vaquita (Phocoena sinus)" (PDF). Aquatic Mammals. 17 (3): 130–133. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  35. ^ a b c Rojas-Bracho, L.; Reeves, R. R.; Jaramillo-Legorreta, A. (13 November 2006). "Conservation of the vaquita Phocoena sinus". Mammal Review. 36 (3): 179–216. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2006.00088.x.
  36. ^ a b Avila-Forcada, S.; Martínez-Cruz, A. N. L.; Muñoz-Piña, C. (May 2012). "Conservation of vaquita marina in the Northern Gulf of California". Marine Policy. 36 (3): 613–622. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.012.
  37. ^ Jefferson, Thomas A.; Webber, Marc A.; Pitman, Robert L. (29 August 2011). Marine Mammals of the World: A Comprehensive Guide to Their Identification. Academic Press. pp. 288–289. ISBN 978-0-08-055784-7. OCLC 326418543.
  38. ^ a b Emanoil, M. (1 February 2009). "Vaquita (Phocoena sinus)". Encyclopedia of Endangered Species. Vol. 1. Gale Research. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-8103-8857-4.
  39. ^ Pompa, S.; Ehrlich, P. R.; Ceballos, G. (16 August 2011). "Global distribution and conservation of marine mammals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (33): 13600–13605. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101525108. PMC 3158205. PMID 21808012.
  40. ^ Carwardine, Mark (1995). Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises. Dorling Kindersley. ISBN 978-1-4053-5794-4. OCLC 31010070.
  41. ^ a b Aquarium Passport Book, Aquarium of the Pacific, 2005.
  42. ^ "¡Viva Vaquita!". ¡Viva.
  43. ^ Taylor, B. L.; Rojas-Bracho, L. (October 1999). "Examining the risk of inbreeding depression in a naturally rare cetacean, the vaquita (Phocoena sinus)". Marine Mammal Science. 15 (4): 1004–1028. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00875.x.
  44. ^ "U.S. supports Mexico's efforts to save the vaquita". El Universal. 16 April 2015.
  45. ^ Malkin, E. (16 April 2015). "Mexico's President Rolls Out Plan to Save Endangered Porpoise". The New York Times.
  46. ^ Smith, Zak (16 March 2015). "The Call to Ban Mexican Seafood Products Gets Louder After Mexico Announces its Plan for Vaquita Extinction". nrdc.org. Archived from the original on 17 April 2015. Retrieved 17 April 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  47. ^ The Mexico News Daily. 2017. More vaquitas remain than thought: Profepa. Retrieved on July 26, 2017
  48. ^ a b c Malkin, Elisabeth (17 October 2018). "Scientists Catch Rare Glimpses of the Endangered Vaquita". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  49. ^ a b "Experts urge gulf refuge for endangered vaquita porpoise". Associated Press. 17 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  50. ^ Action Program For the Conservation of the Species. United Mexican States Federal Government, 2008, pp. 1–76, Action Program For the Conservation of the Species.
  51. ^ a b Pitman, Robert L.; Rojas-Bracho, Lorenzo (July–August 2007). "How Now, Little Cow?". Natural History.
  52. ^ d'Agrosa, C.; Lennert-Cody, C. E.; Vidal, O. (August 2000). "Vaquita bycatch in Mexico's artisanal gillnet fisheries: driving a small population to extinction". Conservation Biology. 14 (4): 1110–1119. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98191.x.
  53. ^ Gerrodette, T.; Taylor, B. L.; Swift, R.; Rankin, S.; Jaramillo-Legorreta, A. M.; Rojas-Bracho, L. (2011). "A combined visual and acoustic estimate of 2008 abundance, and change in abundance since 1997, for the vaquita, Phocoena sinus". Marine Mammal Science. 27 (2): E79–E100. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00438.x.
  54. ^ Report of the Fourth Meeting of the International Committee for the Recovery of the Vaquita (CIRVA). CIRVA, 2011, pp. 1–47, Report of the Fourth Meeting of the International Committee for the Recovery of the Vaquita (CIRVA).
  55. ^ a b c Rojas-Bracho, Lorenzo; Reeves, Randall R.; Jaramillo-Legorreta, Armando (2006). "Conservation of the vaquita Phocoena sinus". Mammal Review. 36, No. 3: 179–216 – via JSTOR.
  56. ^ CIRVA committee, Report of the Fourth Meeting of the International Committee for the Recovery of the Vaquita (CIRVA). IUCN. 2012
  57. ^ Rojas-Bracho, L.; Taylor, B. L. (October 1999). "Risk factors affecting the vaquita (Phocoena sinus)". Marine Mammal Science. 15 (4): 974–989. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00873.x.
  58. ^ a b Díaz-Uribe, J. G.; Arreguín-Sánchez, F.; Lercari-Bernier, D.; Cruz-Escalona, V. C. H.; Zetina-Rejón, M. J.; Del-Monte-Luna, P.; Martínez-Aguilar, S. (10 April 2012). "An integrated ecosystem trophic model for the North and Central Gulf of California: An alternative view for endemic species conservation". Ecological Modelling. 230: 73–91. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.009.
  59. ^ a b Elton, Catherine (November–December 2011). "Safety Net". Audubon. 113 (6): 74–80. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  60. ^ "Recovering the Vaquita and Promoting Sustainable Local Livelihoods: Project Summary". Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2011. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  61. ^ a b Gerrodette, T.; Rojas-Bracho, L. (7 February 2011). "Estimating the success of protected areas for the vaquita, Phocoena sinus". Marine Mammal Science. 27 (2): E101–E125. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00449.x.
  62. ^ "Last Chance to Save the Vaquita?". Greenpeace.org.uk. 2014. Archived from the original on 15 January 2017. Retrieved 26 November 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  63. ^ "Operation Milagro III - Vaquita Porpoise Defense Campaign - About Campaign". Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  64. ^ "Operation Milagro III - Home". www.seashepherd.org. Retrieved 2017-08-06.
  65. ^ "Mexico Permanently Bans Gillnets in the Upper Gulf!". Souls of the Vermillion Sea (vaquitafilm.com). Wild Lens Inc. July 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
  66. ^ "Official CIRVA Report is Released". Souls of the Vermillion Sea (vaquitafilm.com). Wild Lens Inc. February 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
  67. ^ "Vaquita porpoise: Dolphins deployed to save rare species". BBC. 1 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  68. ^ Aburto‐Oropeza, Octavio; López‐Sagástegui, Catalina; Moreno‐Báez, Marcia; Mascareñas‐Osorio, Ismael; Jiménez‐Esquivel, Victoria; Johnson, Andrew Frederick; Erisman, Brad (1 January 2018). "Endangered Species, Ecosystem Integrity, and Human Livelihoods". Conservation Letters. 11 (1): e12358. doi:10.1111/conl.12358. ISSN 1755-263X.
  69. ^ a b Goldfarb, B. (12 August 2016). "Can captive breeding save Mexico's vaquita?". Science. 353 (6300): 633–634. doi:10.1126/science.353.6300.633. PMID 27516576.
  70. ^ Experts to start capturing rare vaquita porpoises in Mexico, Mark Stevenson, The Associated Press / MilitaryTimes.com, 2017-10-05
  71. ^ "Vaquita Conservation, Protection and Recovery". National Marine Mammal Foundation. Retrieved 2017-08-06.
  72. ^ "Update: After death of captured vaquita, conservationists call off rescue effort". Science | AAAS. 12 October 2017. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  73. ^ "Endangered Mexican vaquita dies after rescue effort". BBC. 6 November 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  74. ^ Totoaba Farming May Help Vaquita Porpoise. Food News. 13 February 2018
  75. ^ Semarnat issues marking rules for Totoaba raised in captivity. (Automated translation from Spanish) Ernesto Méndez, Excelsior. 22 August 2017.
  76. ^ Mexico to create fish farms to save vaquita porpoise from extinction. Xinhua News. 10 February 2018.
  77. ^ "Sea Shepherd ship attacked in Mexico's Gulf of California". washingtonpost.com. Associated Press. 1 February 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
  78. ^ "Possible vaquita death accompanies announcement that only 10 are left". Mongabay.com. 18 March 2019. Retrieved 23 April 2019.

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Phocoena sinus.
Wikispecies has information related to Phocoena sinus.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaquita&oldid=906573943"