Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Plastikspork (talk | contribs) at 00:23, 10 November 2019 (Module:WikidataF: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to still be needed 5 and a half years after creation. "for testing" * Pppery * it has begun... 22:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The template that this module claims to implement, Template:Label is actually implemented using Module:Wikibase, leaving this module as redundant with no usage other than one help desk post by PrimeHunter pointing out it exists. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Referred to only by non-used portions of Module:WikidataF, which is itself nominated for deletion below. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:44, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The only template that uses this module is Template:Infobox Swiss town, where it serves a function that could be served by Template:Wikidata (using Module:Wd). * Pppery * it has begun... 21:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete or rather move to the creator's sandbox once it has been replaced Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The dewiki function, which >99% of all transclusions are using, is redundant to Module:Delink. The only other uses are an example in the 2013 discussion that led to the creation of this module, and one use of the wikiall function, which could easily be substituted or (if avoidance of markup duplication is desired) replaced with a call to Template:For nowiki. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I am responsible for 99% of those transclusions, simply because I didn't know about Module:Delink. I would however consider it better to simply move it to the creator's (or my) sandbox incase any of the features turn out to be useful in the future. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect with comment "[[Special:Permalink/923647330|Requested]] by Pppery at [[WP:RM/TR]]: Per request by author at TfD" by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used. Removed from service in this diff after the categories it assigned were deleted via CFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused template. The statistical data is old (2019/4). Wolfch (talk) 16:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. The data is about statistical data (position vacancies in Taiwan) and there is no data after 2019 May. Wolfch (talk) 16:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used after Special:Diff/918909606. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).