Talk:List of impeachments of heads of state
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Title column
Why is there a "Title" column when all titles are/should be President? --213.112.65.159 (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Because the list also includes the holders of other, equivalent titles, like Warren Hastings, whose title was "Governor-General". ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Oops
There have been no completed USA impeachments.
I disagree, but I suppose it depends on the nature of the argument. Impeachment does not mean removal from office (at least in the USA). It is similar to an indictment or an arrest, for sanctions to occur (removal from office) the impeached official must be tried and convicted by the Senate (for US federal officials) or the appropriate body politic.
Clinton and Andrew Johnson were impeached but they were not *convicted* so remained in office. I suspect that is the same for many of the others in the list.N9jig (talk) 00:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Those should be listed under failed. FinalNemesis (talk) 02:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
“Tricky Dickie” and impeachment”
The impeachment proceedings against Richard M. Nixon were not a failure at all, but were the one totally successful use of the process. In almost a quarter millennium since the constitution was ratified, he’s the only president to have resigned. It’s all about removing a president. In 1974, Nixon was removed from office by his own hand.Arglebargle79 (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Nixon is a special case and probably deserves to have a section all by his lonesome self. Impeachment of a U.S. president does not automatically remove him from office without the trial in the U.S. Senate. A number of other countries listed here are similar, in that they also require another body to actually remove its president. Going down the two recent entries listed here, the impeachment of Park Geun-hye required the Constitutional Court of Korea to actually remove him. In the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff, another vote had to be taken by the Federal Senate after the Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) passed the impeachment. No, Nixon was the only one resigned before ever facing the impeachment vote, and thus should be listed separately. Otherwise (especially for international readers), he'll get buried in the list where this unique case will likely be overlooked. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- There was a Movement to impeach Pervez Musharraf, President of Pakistan and he resigned to avoid being impeached, should he be included in the same section? --Millionsandbillions (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Ongoing impeachment inquiries
@Wekeepwhatwekill, Zzyzx11, and Johndavies837: I believe that is all the registered users who have either added or removed something about the Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump to this article. In addition there are two IP users who have either added or removed the content.
We should probably have a discussion and hash out what sort of criteria there should be for inclusion. There is a good argument to be made that Trump should not be on this list until he has actually been impeached - i.e. the house passes articles of impeachment. That said, if that's the case than Nixon should not be on the list either, and most (or all) of the "Failed impeachment attempts" section should go. (Certainly Bush and Tyler should go in that case, although Warren Hastings should stay since his impeachment actually went to trial. I'm not sure about the others.)
On the other hand, I can see merit to including serious impeachment investigations that fall short of formal proceedings in a separate section, which is what I think is being attempted with the failed impeachment attempts section. If we are doing that, then Trump definitely belongs. The problem there is separating serious investigations from frivolous ones. At least in the U.S., virtually every president has at least a fringe on the other side calling for impeachment from day one, and we have an article about Efforts to impeach Barack Obama, but I don't believe the efforts there ever rose to a level where they should be included on this list.
At any rate, for the moment I have commented out the section including Trump, but left the older Failed impeachment attempts section and Nixon. What are everyone else's thoughts? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 13:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Also, from the page history, [1], note "Ongoing impeachment attempts" regarding Pedro Pablo Kuczynski. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 13:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the discussion. You're right about Nixon, he wasn't impeached and should be removed because that's what the reliable sources say. The same thing would be true about Donald Trump.
- As far as needing a criteria, I don't think we need a specific criteria for this page, we already have a criteria governing all of Wikipedia, essentially, if it's in a realiable source, it can potentially be printed in wikipedia, if it's not a reliable source that it cannot be printed Wikipedia. What do the rest of you think ? Necromonger...We keep what we kill 14:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- When I edited the page, Trump was listed under "Successful impeachments," which is factually incorrect because there hasn't been a vote yet. It seems some people are confused about what an impeachment inquiry is and isn't (not only on Wikipedia, I've seen the same confusion on social media and in a few media reports). A section called "Ongoing impeachment inquiries" sounds good to me, although strictly speaking it doesn't fit the page criteria (yet), as it is called List of impeached presidents. But the same could be said for the "Failed impeachment attempts" section. Maybe the page should be renamed to be more inclusive? Johndavies837 (talk) 14:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- +1 I would change the first line to "This is a list of presidents or holders of other offices equivalent to a head of state who have undergone impeachment proceedings, or have been subject to formal impeachment inquiries by an overseeing body." and change the article name to "List of presidential impeachments" so as to encompass the proceedings/inquiries themselves, and not just the people subject to them or the outcomes, which differ from country to country depending on how their impeachment laws work. A sentient pickle (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I was bold and made this change. I believe refocusing the wording in the title and lead to the impeachment attempts/inquiries themselves makes more sense. This way those that succeeded, failed or are in progress can be included. A sentient pickle (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Vandalism relating to American President Donald Trump's recent impeachment
Anonymous editors have been repeatedly removing him from the list.
Sinsoto (talk) 02:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- That was fast. Sinsoto (talk) 02:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- He should be removed from the list. The Democrats' own witness during the impeachment proceedings wrote an op-ed insisting that Trump has not been impeached until the process in the House is complete and the articles are sent over to the Senate for trial. If you have a shred of integrity, you'll remove him from the list yourself.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democrats 2600:1012:B165:9CCE:6194:C251:E700:C2EA (talk) 11:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
I second this last edit request Keleusx (talk) 12:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to List of presidential impeachments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Wikipedia article "Impeachment" is linked twice within in the opening sentence, one immediately after the other. I propose we remove one of the links. Which one, it doesn't matter. 47.13.147.63 (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to List of presidential impeachments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The line: "where he will likely be aquitted and remain in office" is speculative and can have a propagandist effect, and thus should be removed. It's sufficient and factual to write: "Impeached by the House of Representatives. Awaiting trial in the United States Senate." Pavlovius (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
It's a foregone conclusion that he will be aquitted in the Senate. Not including that he will likely be aquitted is lying by omission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alec935 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Already done DannyS712 (talk) 07:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to List of presidential impeachments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Donald Trump needs to be removed from the Successful Impeachments list and put back on "Ongoing" since he was added too early. Per the United States Constitution impeachment is a process and not a vote, the process is not complete until the articles of impeachment have been transmitted to the senate which they have not as they are still held in the House of Representatives. Once they are transmitted Donald Trump will be legally classified as Impeached as the process for impeachment will have been completed. [1] The status of "Awaiting Trial in the United States Senate" should also be removed as such being that the impeachment is not in the senate yet so the House still has control of it and can vote on adjustments etc... It will be awaiting trial in the senate, once its in the senate. Keleusx (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Courtesy link: this is also being discussed at Talk:Impeachment in the United States. 331dot (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
"Not technically impeached"
Trump's impeachment was edited to say that he was not technically impeached because the impeachment was not formally transmitted to the senate. There is a bloomberg article arguing this, but this opinion seems to be very far from a hard fact about the constitution. I believe this should either be removed, or should be reworded to say that "some have argued ..." but this opinion should not be presented as an absolute truth about the constitution
I think this article should follow the precedent of Talk:Impeachment of Donald Trump in stating in the affirmative that Trump has been impeached and not present a single law professor's opinion as objective fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.140.23.146 (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to List of presidential impeachments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The House has the sole power to impeach, the President is not 'technically not impeached' he is impeached 2600:6C5A:6F7F:FF7C:6CFE:5E75:D6F7:183A (talk) 20:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
"Not technically impeached" is absolutely incorrect
From the United States Constitution: Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides that "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provides that "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments"
From the wikipedia page on impeachment located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States : "Procedure At the federal level, the impeachment process is a three-step procedure.[19] First, the Congress investigates... Second, the House of Representatives must pass, by a simple majority of those present and voting, articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Third, the Senate tries the accused..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.50.75 (talk) 21:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Further, the Wiki Article on the Impeachment of Donald Trump has several citations making clear that Trump has been impeached. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Donald_Trump — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.50.75 (talk) 22:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- ”If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. https://www.senate.gov/reference/Index/Impeachment.htm
- The legal meaning of “formally charged” is that charges have been filed.
- Even though the house has voted to impeach, charges have not been filed. Hence Donald Trump has NOT been impeached.MoMoBig (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Yes, technically impeached
Since fucking when is an opinion article a valid source for a claim here? Remove the section that says "technically not impeached." The House voted and the yeas have it. He is impeached. This is not a debate. Remove it now. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I did it myself. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- The word “impeached” means that charges have been filed to remove him from office. The house has NOT filed charges, so Trump has NOT been impeached. The fact that they voted to impeach him is not enough. They have to file charges. That’s a fact. But since wikipedia is not about correctness or truth but instead about what certain “reliable sources” say, you go ahead and claim that he was impeached, even though it is undeniable that he was not.MoMoBig (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- WP:NOR. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 10:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- My source is the official website of the Senate: https://www.senate.gov/reference/Index/Impeachment.htm Are you telling me that the Senats own website is not a reliable source? MoMoBig (talk) 13:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- WP:NOR. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 10:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- The word “impeached” means that charges have been filed to remove him from office. The house has NOT filed charges, so Trump has NOT been impeached. The fact that they voted to impeach him is not enough. They have to file charges. That’s a fact. But since wikipedia is not about correctness or truth but instead about what certain “reliable sources” say, you go ahead and claim that he was impeached, even though it is undeniable that he was not.MoMoBig (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
That source makes it clear that the impeachment and trial are two separate processes. ThermalDetonator (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- The source states that “...the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official.” Do you have a source that confirms that Donald Trump has been formally charged?MoMoBig (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
not impeached yet. Per Harvard constitutional scholar and impeachment trial witness: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democratsRotaryenginepete (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Obviously. It’s a fact that he has not been impeached. You don’t need some lawyer to tell you that. But as other guys have mentioned, wikipedia is not interested in facts. They merely repeat what their “reliable sources” claim. I’ve had this problem with other stuff on wikipedia that is just blatantly false and it all boils down to what those “reliable sources” claim. I personally think that is a massive problem and gives tremendous power to the people who select those “reliable sources”.MoMoBig (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- House Resolution 755 states in the resolution that Trump is impeached. "Resolved, That Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors". Is this wrong? WhoAteMyButter (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- If you want an unarchived version, here it is. 00:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhoAteMyButter (talk • contribs)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to List of presidential impeachments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On the table of impeached presidents, for Trump, the Crimes need to be changed from "Abuse of power, obstruction of Congress" to "Alleged Abuse of power (non-statuatory), alleged obstruction of Congress (non-statuatory)" Alleged because the impeachment trial has not been conducted yet, and non-statuatory because the articles of impeachment allege no violation of any statutes. Rotaryenginepete (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done: you don't charge someone with "alleged X", you charge them with "X." The charge is the allegation. There's no need mention statutes. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 04:07, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Trump Should be in Ongoing Section.
Common sense, keep this page factual so people don't lose faith in Wiki. FinalNemesis (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- It's factual as-is. Flyboyrob2112 (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- List-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class biography articles
- List-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles