Jump to content

Talk:Darth Vader

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shrekxy64 (talk | contribs) at 18:47, 19 February 2020 (→‎What?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former good articleDarth Vader was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 14, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
April 10, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 19, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 21, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 2, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 19, 2008Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
September 30, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Hi, the main article is locked for other unknown editors.Please insert the symbols [[]] for Hayden Christensen as a link to the infobox about Darth Vader. Yours sincerely.

"Dark Father" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark Father. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 23:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Vador

In France, due to a dubbing error, the character is called Dark Vador

Source : https://hitek.fr/actualite/erreurs-traduction-star-wars-trilogie_7777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB10:82E3:3C00:F974:91C0:8944:E32F (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-defining categories

This article has been attracting some highly questionable categories lately. In line with WP:OVERCAT, I have removed some of the sillier ones, but they start creeping back in. The categories listed below are not suitable as they are Non-defining characteristics of Darth Vader. Yes, young Anakin built a podracer in Episode I, but Vader has never been described as "Dark Lord of the Sith and aerospace engineer". Same goes for the other categories.

"Categorization by non-defining characteristics should be avoided." - WP:NONDEFINING

Many of these nonsequitur categories get added to other Star Wars character articles too. I was going to call it "cruft", but I remembered it's not allowed any more in case someone's feelings get hurt, so I'll just go with WP:TOOMUCH. Please stop adding them. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What?

I made an edit recently that changed the misspelling of anakin and the use of the name 'Starkiller" to the correct "skywalker", and it has been changed back. Can whoever did it justify? Shrekxy64. 21:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not the reverter, but I can comment on the likely reason. Various early drafts of the first film had the characters be named Luke and Annikin Starkiller, rather than their names in the films themselves. These drafts can have the characters be noticeably distinct from their final incarnations (e.g. at one point Luke was an old general), so I'd get the distinction intended if so.
Still, given that the text doesn't really establish what/who Annikin or Starkiller are at that point, I think the sentence could probably use some rewriting for clarity. Alternatively, I'm leaning towards it being redundant to what's already in the "Concept and writing", so I wouldn't be opposed to removing it (and probably stuffing the "Lucas has said..." sentence at the end of Concept's second paragraph). I'll probably make that change myself shortly. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I wouldn't mind it's removal either, but I would wait to see what some other editors say. Shrekxy64. 18:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]