Jump to content

User talk:TheChunky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KST981 (talk | contribs) at 09:18, 26 May 2020 (Notification: nomination of Ababeel (NGO) at articles for deletion. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello TheChunky, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 03:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The content I added in the article was in public domain. The is allows us to use the content after giving reference to Article owner.
Kindly add back the information. That is too much important for the article. As this article is not from the neutral point of view. I added the two sides of the Exodus as neutral point in the article. :I firstly read that Wikipedia allowed neutral point of view only in Articles. Biased articles not allowed.
I loved to make Wikipedia neutral. TheChunky (talk) 04:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You copied and pasted directly from an article by Scroll.in. Do you have evidence that their content is in the public domain as you claim? — MarkH21talk 05:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I copied and modified it as neutral point of view. And scroll.in allows us to use information, read Sharing Your Information-point 4. https://blog.scroll.in/privacy-policy-764ca1ea1166


Syndication and use of RSS means we can use the content on other websites except personal information. And the article I made is not personal, it is public data.


Now please revise back my edits. TheChunky (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I joined Wikipedia some days ago, after reading some of it's policies what is allowed and what not. And I know what is right for Wikipedia. By reverting my all the edits, you guys are doing wrong. I have given evidence now. And if still my edit didn't come back. I will quit this.

I don't have much time to give evidence of everything which I edit.

I love to contribute Wikipedia and want to make Wikipedia more neutral and verified. But you are stopping me by these ways. TheChunky (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheChunky, you seem to find it quite difficult to follow the policies. So, here is a simple-minded explanation. You need to write your own content in your own words for Wikipedia. If you are unable to do so, you cannot edit Wikipedia. (The fact that the content should be based on what the reliable sources say does not imply that you can copy them.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I got it, I will write the copy pasted content but you had reverted other editing also. Revert other minor edits, I am going to write the copy pasted content in my way. TheChunky (talk) 01:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear on what Kautilya3 means, ensure that all claims and ideas in the added content are directly supported by a reliable source and attributed to the source. Otherwise, if you really write your own content or your own interpretation of content, then it is original research or synthesis which are not permissible. — MarkH21talk 07:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi TheChunky! You created a thread called How to add protection layer on Articles saving from vandalism at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Marina Kuwar (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Marina Kuwar wad based on the bollywood actress.

I added numbers of reliable sources from National media. Kindly check what correction is required.

TheChunky (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadan or Ramadhan

Please do not change the standard spelling. It is really simple: if the article name is spelled "Ramadan", then so should the article and all other articles on Wikipedia, except when it is spelled otherwise in a straight quote. Debresser (talk) 10:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadan doesn't make actual pronunciation. It is simple mistake. Ramadhan makes actual pronunciation. TheChunky (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Be that as it may, please do not change the standard spelling on Wikipedia without discussion. Debresser (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Converted drafts

Several times, you created and worked on a draft, and then created an article on the same topic. This means that both the article and draft co-exist. Either use the process of submitting drafts to Articles for Creation for review and accpet/decline, or else tag the abandoned draft with a request that it be deleted. The tag to put as the first line of the draft is db-g7 inside double curly brackets {{ }} David notMD (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for telling this. I am a new user. I didn't knew this before. Now I will delete the drafts whose articles I published directly.

Actually I was firstly collect the article in a draft and when I complete my article for publish, I use the direct procedure.

Now I understand.

Thanks again. (TheChunky (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your help to article Karwan-I-Islami

If you need help on any issue I may be helpfulMariyaibrahim (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes dear, I might need your help. I will drop a message on talk page when I need your help. And if you need help which I can do, I am also available here, to do all the things under policies of Wikipedia TheChunky (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zea Abad (Thathri) Tagged With Multiple Issues

Hi TheChunky, just wanted to let you know that your recently created article Zea Abad (Thathri) is tagged with multiple issues. You may remove the concerned tags after fixing the issues. The article needs reliable reference as it solely depends on a single source. Keeping the article tagged for a longer time may invite a speedy deletion tag. The Ultimate Let's Talk 18:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to find more sources for it. But I got 2-3 sources only where it is just mentioned. And I think 'just mentioning' is not suits as references.

Just like you can also search Middle School Zea Abad Thathri scam on Early Times newspaper. The Zea Abad name is in documents of the area. So I put it on wiki.

You can help me in fixing the issues too. As you have many edits related to nearby areas. — TheChunky (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ultimate: that article shouldn't be merged with Thathri . As it was separated from Thathri when Thathri became town in 2010. I am trying to finding sources online to add them as references. TheChunky (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I may help in improving the article as I find some reliable sources mentioning the place. Keep up your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. :) The Ultimate Let's Talk 07:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheChunky

Thank you for creating Safoora Zargar.

User:AaqibAnjum, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The subject has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and is definitely notable for having a stand-alone article, even per WP:1E.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AaqibAnjum}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You brother. You may know how much misinformation was spread about that person. So I collected the information and made this.

Thanks, hope you guide me in future too. @AaqibAnjum:

TheChunky (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheChunky:, If there is much vandalism, please request for page protection at WP:RFPP. Thanks. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, the article Safoora Zargar was much vandalised since I created it. I managed edit it again and again.

Kindly tell me, how to restore older version if someone vandalised our Article. And how to mention that user for blocking from vandalism. — TheChunky (talk) 22:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing 'our' on the Wikipedia. However, if someone vandalizes any article, there are two things to do, one is to revert the edit and the second is to warn that user on his talk page. You must see in the history section of any article is Undo option on the top most edit, that's pretty long haul if there are numerous such edits. If a single user makes multiple edits which count as vandalism, they're reverted through a special permission called Rollback in a single click, and that's not a permission given to newbie users. If you want earlier version of the article to be restored, you can do this by going to the relevant diff in the article's history and click restore; but that would remove all the edits made after that diff, even good ones. You should try adding content again from the history of article. You can also use Twinkle to counter vandalism. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. I didn't mean that possession for calling it 'our'. I means to say that the article I started/created.

I know that articles didn't belongs to anyone personally.

- TheChunky (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vicky Manhas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon 03:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Search the name, and see why it is notable. TheChunky (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the first article I am writing. I know the notability criteria.

Kindly remove this tag. TheChunky (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, he has lakhs of views on his videos and now a popular name. He is working with Kalpanik Films (a Mumbai based record label).

Are these things not sufficient?

TheChunky (talk) 03:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Safoora Zargar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Safoora Zargar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safoora Zargar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DTM (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vicky Manhas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicky Manhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Manhas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

If you have time, please see this article I had started a long time ago and try to expand it - Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir. Thanks. DTM (talk) 08:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I would love to contribute. TheChunky (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to give reference from a book which is not published online, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ababeel (NGO) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ababeel (NGO) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ababeel (NGO) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KST981 (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]