Friendly fire: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citations/clarifications.
Johnbibby (talk | contribs)
Line 41: Line 41:
* [[U.S. invasion of Afghanistan|Invasion of Afghanistan]] (2002): 4 (13%) *note* fatalities were Canadian Soldiers, not American. Caused when a US fighter pilot dropped a [[Mark 82 bomb|500 lb (228 kg) bomb]] while Canadian soldiers were performing a live fire exercise on [[April 17]], [[2002]] [http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/04/18/afghanistan.canada/]
* [[U.S. invasion of Afghanistan|Invasion of Afghanistan]] (2002): 4 (13%) *note* fatalities were Canadian Soldiers, not American. Caused when a US fighter pilot dropped a [[Mark 82 bomb|500 lb (228 kg) bomb]] while Canadian soldiers were performing a live fire exercise on [[April 17]], [[2002]] [http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/04/18/afghanistan.canada/]
* Afghanistan NATO Mission - Operation Medusa (2006): 1 *note* the fatality was a Canadian Soldier, not American. Caused when two U.S. A-10 Thunderbolts accidentally strafed their own NATO forces in southern Afghanistan, killing Canadian Private Mark Anthony Graham, and seriously wounding five others when soldiers were trying to seize a Taliban stronghold along the Arghandab River. Graham was a former Canadian Olympic althlete who competed on the Canadian 4x400 Men's Relay Team at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics.
* Afghanistan NATO Mission - Operation Medusa (2006): 1 *note* the fatality was a Canadian Soldier, not American. Caused when two U.S. A-10 Thunderbolts accidentally strafed their own NATO forces in southern Afghanistan, killing Canadian Private Mark Anthony Graham, and seriously wounding five others when soldiers were trying to seize a Taliban stronghold along the Arghandab River. Graham was a former Canadian Olympic althlete who competed on the Canadian 4x400 Men's Relay Team at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics.

In addition to the above, numbers of UK personnel have also been killed by US forces. In Britain the term 'friendly fire' is used in a semi-ironic way.

In Iraq, many friendly Iraqis have also been killed and injured in a similar manner, but the US military has proudly stted that it collect no statsitics on these outcomes.


==Incidents and persons==
==Incidents and persons==

Revision as of 16:11, 29 October 2006

Friendly fire (fratricide or non-hostile fire) is a term originally adopted by the United States military in reference to an attack on friendly forces by other friendly forces,[1] which may be deliberate (e.g. incorrectly identifying the target as the enemy), or accidental (e.g. missing the enemy and hitting "friendlies"). Friendly fire is contrasted with fire originating from enemy forces ("enemy fire"). In a friendly fire incident personnel may be killed, or material assets may be damaged or destroyed. Friendly fire is one kind of collateral damage.

The British military refers to these incidents as blue on blue,[2] which derives from wargaming exercises where friendly forces are "blue" and enemy forces are "red".

In the Philippines, the military term for a friendly fire incident is a misencounter.[citation needed]

Fratricide versus Friendly Fire

Some prefer the term fratricide over friendly fire, because they deem the latter to be an unfitting euphemism exemplified by the aphorism "there's nothing friendly about getting shot by your own side."[1] However, the origin and purpose of the term is as a simple distinction to enemy fire. Both terms serve only to identify the source of an attack as coming from enemy (hostile) or friendly forces and not the nature of an attack.

The term amicicide (killing of a friend) has also been used in the same manner as fratricide (Shrader 1982).

Classification

Friendly fire incidents fall roughly into two categories. The first classification is Fog of war which generically describes friendly fire incidents in unintentional circumstances. The second classification is murder where friendly fire incidents are premeditated. During the Vietnam War, this was known as fragging.[1]

Fog of war incidents fall roughly into two classes:[1]

Errors of position
Where fire aimed at enemy forces accidentally ends up hitting one's own. Such incidents were relatively common during the First and Second World Wars, where troops fought in proximity to each other and targeting was relatively inaccurate. As weapons have become more accurate in recent times, this class of incidents has become less common but is still possible, the most recent and highly publicized example being Operation Enduring Freedom, wherein a GPS-guided bomb was mistakenly called in on friendly forces, causing massive casualties.
Errors of identification
Where friendly troops are mistakenly attacked in the belief that they are enemy. Highly mobile battles, and battles involving troops from many nations are more likely to cause this kind of incident as evidenced by incidents in the first Gulf War, or the shooting down of a British aircraft by a US Patriot Battery during the Invasion of Iraq.[3]

History

Two French regiments accidentally attacking each other during the Battle of Fleurus led to the habit of attaching a white scarf to the flags of the regiments from 1690 - white being the colour of the kings of France.[citation needed]

Friendly fire in the U.S. military

The Pentagon estimates of U.S. friendly fire deaths, with percentage of total US deaths:

  • World War II: 21,000 (16%)
    • second-highest-ranking U.S. loss of the war, Lt. General Lesley J. McNair
    • Sinking of the Surcouf. This was initially attributed to a collision with the US Freighter Thompson Lykes, but a later report stated that the Surcouf was mistaken for a U-boat and destroyed by US planes. Which event occurred is disputed by historians.
    • Sinking of the USS Dorado (SS-248) by US plane.
    • Damage to the USS Atlanta (CL-51) by USS San Francisco.
  • Vietnam war: 8,000 (14%)
  • Gulf War: 35 (23%)
  • Invasion of Afghanistan (2002): 4 (13%) *note* fatalities were Canadian Soldiers, not American. Caused when a US fighter pilot dropped a 500 lb (228 kg) bomb while Canadian soldiers were performing a live fire exercise on April 17, 2002 [2]
  • Afghanistan NATO Mission - Operation Medusa (2006): 1 *note* the fatality was a Canadian Soldier, not American. Caused when two U.S. A-10 Thunderbolts accidentally strafed their own NATO forces in southern Afghanistan, killing Canadian Private Mark Anthony Graham, and seriously wounding five others when soldiers were trying to seize a Taliban stronghold along the Arghandab River. Graham was a former Canadian Olympic althlete who competed on the Canadian 4x400 Men's Relay Team at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics.

In addition to the above, numbers of UK personnel have also been killed by US forces. In Britain the term 'friendly fire' is used in a semi-ironic way.

In Iraq, many friendly Iraqis have also been killed and injured in a similar manner, but the US military has proudly stted that it collect no statsitics on these outcomes.

Incidents and persons

Distinction

Friendly fire is fire which was intended to do harm to the enemy; a death resulting from a negligent discharge is not considered "friendly fire".

See also

Notes

  • ^ This figure comes from a 1921 book by an artillery expert, General Percin, called Le massacre de notre infanterie, 1914-1918. The book claims 75,000 French soldiers were casualties of their own artillery. Percin supports his claim with hundreds of battlefield correspondence from all parts of the Western Front.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Regan, G. Backfire: a history of friendly fire from ancient warfare to the present day. Robson Books, 2002.
  2. ^ [1]
  3. ^ The Economist Closing in on Baghdad March 25 2003
  • Shrader, Charles R. Amicicide: the problem of friendly fire in modern war, University Press of the Pacific, 2005. ISBN 1-4102-1991-7
  • Regan, G. More Military Blunders. Carlton Books, 2004.

External links