2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 474200311 by Darkness Shines (talk) - you need to read WP:WEASEL. This is per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. Do not editwar.
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
As before, unsourced and weasel words. Just get a source, and please do not accuse me of edit warring when you add uncited content to an article
Line 30: Line 30:
The '''2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff''' was a military [[standoff]] between India and [[Pakistan]] that resulted in the massing of troops on either side of the [[International Border]] (IB) and along the [[Line of Control]] (LoC) in the region of [[Kashmir]]. This was the second major military standoff between India and Pakistan following the successful detonation of [[nuclear weapon|nuclear devices]] by both countries in 1998 and the most recent standoff between the nuclear rivals. The other had been the [[Kargil War]].
The '''2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff''' was a military [[standoff]] between India and [[Pakistan]] that resulted in the massing of troops on either side of the [[International Border]] (IB) and along the [[Line of Control]] (LoC) in the region of [[Kashmir]]. This was the second major military standoff between India and Pakistan following the successful detonation of [[nuclear weapon|nuclear devices]] by both countries in 1998 and the most recent standoff between the nuclear rivals. The other had been the [[Kargil War]].


The military build up was initiated by India responding to a terrorist attack on the [[Parliament of India|Indian Parliament]] on December 13, 2001 during which twelve people, including the five men who attacked the building, were killed. India claimed that the attacks were carried out by two Pakistan based [[Terrorist]] groups fighting Indian rule in Kashmir, [[Lashkar-e-Taiba]] (LeT) and [[Jaish-e-Mohammad]] (JeM), both of whom were allegedly backed by Pakistan's [[Inter Services Intelligence]] (ISI) agency,<ref name=letjemisi>[http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=917228 "Who will strike first"], [[The Economist]], December 20, 2001.</ref> a charge Pakistan denied.{{cn|date=January 2012}} In the [[Western countries|Western]] media, coverage of the standoff focused on the possibility of a [[Nuclear warfare|nuclear war]] between the two countries and the implications of the potential conflict on the United States-led [[War on Terrorism]]. Tensions de-escalated following international [[diplomatic]] mediation which resulted in the October 2002 withdrawal of Indian<ref name=toiwithdraw>[http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?artid=25384627 "India to withdraw troops from Pak border"], [[Times of India]], October 16, 2002.</ref> and Pakistani troops<ref name=bbcwithdraw>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/2335599.stm "Pakistan to withdraw front-line troops"], [[BBC]], October 17, 2002.</ref> from the International Border.
The military build up was initiated by India responding to a terrorist attack on the [[Parliament of India|Indian Parliament]] on December 13, 2001 during which twelve people, including the five men who attacked the building, were killed. India claimed that the attacks were carried out by two Pakistan based [[Terrorist]] groups fighting Indian rule in Kashmir, [[Lashkar-e-Taiba]] (LeT) and [[Jaish-e-Mohammad]] (JeM), both of whom, were backed by Pakistan's [[Inter Services Intelligence]] (ISI) agency,<ref name=letjemisi>[http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=917228 "Who will strike first"], [[The Economist]], December 20, 2001.</ref> a charge Pakistan denied.{{cn|date=January 2012}} In the [[Western countries|Western]] media, coverage of the standoff focused on the possibility of a [[Nuclear warfare|nuclear war]] between the two countries and the implications of the potential conflict on the United States-led [[War on Terrorism]]. Tensions de-escalated following international [[diplomatic]] mediation which resulted in the October 2002 withdrawal of Indian<ref name=toiwithdraw>[http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?artid=25384627 "India to withdraw troops from Pak border"], [[Times of India]], October 16, 2002.</ref> and Pakistani troops<ref name=bbcwithdraw>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/2335599.stm "Pakistan to withdraw front-line troops"], [[BBC]], October 17, 2002.</ref> from the International Border.


== Parliament attack ==
== Parliament attack ==

Revision as of 12:32, 31 January 2012

2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff
Part of the Indo-Pakistani Wars
DateDecember 13, 2001 - June 10, 2002
Location
India-Pakistan border
Result De-escalation arranged by Russia and the United States.
Belligerents

 India


 Indian Army

 Pakistan


 Pakistan Army
Commanders and leaders
India PM Atal Vajpayee
India President K. R. Narayanan
Gen. S. Padmanabhan, COAS
ACM S. Krishnaswamy
Adm. Madhvendra Singh
Pakistan Gen Pervez Musharraf
Gen. Aziz Khan
Gen. Yusaf Khan
ACM Mushaf Ali Mir
Adm. Shahid Karimullah
Strength
500,000 to 700,000 soldiers[1] 300,000 to 400,000 soldiers[1]
Casualties and losses
789 killed[2] - 1874 killed or wounded.[3] Unknown[citation needed]

The 2001–2002 India–Pakistan standoff was a military standoff between India and Pakistan that resulted in the massing of troops on either side of the International Border (IB) and along the Line of Control (LoC) in the region of Kashmir. This was the second major military standoff between India and Pakistan following the successful detonation of nuclear devices by both countries in 1998 and the most recent standoff between the nuclear rivals. The other had been the Kargil War.

The military build up was initiated by India responding to a terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament on December 13, 2001 during which twelve people, including the five men who attacked the building, were killed. India claimed that the attacks were carried out by two Pakistan based Terrorist groups fighting Indian rule in Kashmir, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), both of whom, were backed by Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) agency,[4] a charge Pakistan denied.[citation needed] In the Western media, coverage of the standoff focused on the possibility of a nuclear war between the two countries and the implications of the potential conflict on the United States-led War on Terrorism. Tensions de-escalated following international diplomatic mediation which resulted in the October 2002 withdrawal of Indian[5] and Pakistani troops[6] from the International Border.

Parliament attack

On the morning of December 13, 2001, a group of five armed men attacked the Indian Parliament by breaching the security cordon at Gate 12. The five men killed seven people before being shot dead by the Parliament security.

World leaders and leaders in India's immediate neighbourhood condemned the attack on the Parliament, including Pakistan. On December 14, the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) blamed Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed for the attack. Home Minister LK Advani claimed, "we have received some clues about yesterday's incident, which shows that a neighbouring country, and some terrorist organisations active there behind it,"[7] in an indirect reference to Pakistan and Pakistan-based militant groups. The same day, in a demarche to Pakistani High Commissioner to India Ashraf Jehangir Qazi, India demanded that Pakistan stop the activities of LeT and JeM, that Pakistan apprehend the organisation's leaders and that Pakistan curb the financial assets and the group's access to these assets.[8] In response to the Indian government's statements, Pakistani forces were put on high alert the same day. Pakistan military spokesman Major-General Rashid Qureshi claimed that the Parliament attack was a "drama staged by Indian intelligence agencies to defame the freedom struggle in 'occupied Kashmir'" and further warned that India would pay "heavily if they engage in any misadventure".[9] On December 20, amid calls from the United States and the United Nations (UN) to exercise restraint, India mobilised and deployed its troops to Kashmir and the Indian part of the Punjab in what was India's largest military mobilization since the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War. The mobilization was known as Operation Parakram (Sanskrit: Valor).[10]

Confrontations

December–January

Following India's move, Pakistan responded by moving large numbers of its troops from the border with Afghanistan, where they had been trying to contain Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters, to the Indian border. In late December, both countries moved ballistic missiles closer to each other's border, and mortar and artillery fire was reported in Kashmir.[11] By January 2002, India had mobilized around 500,000 troops and three armored divisions on the Pakistani border concentrated along the Line of Control in Kashmir. Pakistan responded similarly, deploying around 300,000 troops to that region.[1] This was the largest buildup on the subcontinent since the 1971 war.

On January 12, 2002, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf gave a speech intended to reduce tensions with India. He declared that Pakistan would combat extremism on its own soil, but said that Pakistan had a right to Kashmir.[12]

Indian leaders reacted with skepticism. Minister of State for External Affairs Omar Abdullah, a Kashmiri himself said that the speech was nothing new, and others said that it would 'not make any change in the Indian stand'.[13] Still, tensions eased somewhat. The Indian President told his generals that there would be no attack "for now."[14]

May–June

However, tensions escalated dramatically in May. On May 14, three gunmen killed 34 people in an army camp near Jammu, most of them the wives and children of Hindu and Sikh soldiers serving in Kashmir. The Army was angered by the attack and pressed Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee and his cabinet for permission to attack Pakistani military targets.[14] On May 18, India expelled Pakistan’s ambassador. That same day, thousands of villagers fled Pakistani artillery fire in Jammu.[15] On May 2, clashes killed 6 Pakistani soldiers and 1 Indian soldier, as well as civilians from both sides.[16] On May 22, Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee warned his troops to prepare for a "decisive battle." Beginning on May 24 and lasting for several days, Pakistan carried out a series of missile tests. On June 7, an Indian UAV was shot down inside Pakistan near the city of Lahore.[17]

At the same time, attempts to defuse the situation continued. Alarmed at the possibility of nuclear war, the US ordered all non-essential citizens to leave India on May 31.[18] Both Vajpayee and Musharraf blamed each other for the standoff, and a visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin could not mediate a solution. But by mid-June, the Indian government accepted Musharraf’s pledge to end militant infiltration into India, and on June 10, air restrictions over India were ended and Indian warships removed from Pakistan’s coast.[19]

While tensions remained high throughout the next few months, both governments began easing the situation in Kashmir. By October 2002, India and Pakistan had begun to demobilize their troops along their border, and in 2003 a cease-fire between the two nations was signed. No threat of conflict on such a grand scale has occurred again since 2002.

Cost of standoff

The Indian cost for the buildup was 21,600 crore (US$2.7 billion), while the Pakistani cost was estimated to be $1.4 billion. Also it took India months to mobilize and lost 789 men in the process. Around 100 soldiers were killed in the initial phase of laying mines, another 250 were injured. The remaining casualties were a result of artillery duels with Pakistan and vehicle accidents.[20][21]

Threat of nuclear war

As both India and Pakistan are armed with nuclear weapons, the possibility a conventional war could escalate into a nuclear one were raised several times during the standoff. Various statements on this subject were made by Indian and Pakistani officials during the conflict, mainly concerning a no first use policy. Indian Foreign Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh said on June 5 that India would not use nuclear weapons first,[22] while Musharraf said on June 5 he would not renounce Pakistan's right to use nuclear weapons first.[23] The possession of nuclear weapons by both parties proved a decisive factor in preventing all out war.[24] A Defense Intelligence Agency report in May 2002 estimated that a nuclear war between India and Pakistan could, in a worst-case scenario, lead to 8–12 million deaths initially and millions more later from radiation poisoning.[25]

There was also concern that a June 6, 2002 asteroid explosion over Earth, known as the Eastern Mediterranean Event, could have caused a nuclear conflict had it exploded over India or Pakistan.[26]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Kashmir Crisis Global Security.org
  2. ^ "Op Parakram claimed 798 soldiers". The Times Of India.
  3. ^ Pandit, Rajat (1 May 2003). "India suffered 1,874 casualties without fighting a war". Retrieved 12 January 2012.
  4. ^ "Who will strike first", The Economist, December 20, 2001.
  5. ^ "India to withdraw troops from Pak border", Times of India, October 16, 2002.
  6. ^ "Pakistan to withdraw front-line troops", BBC, October 17, 2002.
  7. ^ "Parliament attack: Advani points towards neighbouring country", Rediff, December 14, 2001.
  8. ^ "Govt blames LeT for Parliament attack, asks Pak to restrain terrorist outfits", Rediff, December 14, 2001.
  9. ^ "Pakistan forces put on high alert: Storming of parliament", Dawn (newspaper), December 15, 2001.
  10. ^ "Gen. Padmanabhan mulls over lessons of Operation Parakram". The Hindu. Chennai, India. February 6, 2004.
  11. ^ Pakistan, India 'move missiles' to border CNN, December 26, 2001.
  12. ^ Musharraf declares war on extremism, BBC, January 12, 2002.
  13. ^ "Musharraf's speech greeted with skepticism in India", Rediff, May 27, 2002.
  14. ^ a b "The Stand-off", The New Yorker, February 13, 2006.
  15. ^ "India expels Pakistan's ambassador", CBC.ca, May 18, 2002.
  16. ^ "Six more Pak soldiers killed", The Tribune, May 21, 2002.
  17. ^ IAF's Searcher-II Loss on June 07, 2002
  18. ^ Disarmament Diplomacy: News Review – India and Pakistan Camped on Brink of War over Kashmir
  19. ^ India-Pakistan Conflict, globalsecurity.org
  20. ^ [1][dead link]
  21. ^ http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-07-31/india/27204243_1_op-parakram-indian-soldiers-operation-parakram htm
  22. ^ "India will not use nuclear weapons first"
  23. ^ Irish Examiner – 2002/06/05: "Musharraf refuses to renounce first use of nuclear weapons", Irish Examiner, June 5, 2002
  24. ^ "IPRI :: Islamabad Policy Research Institute". Ipripak.org. Retrieved 2012-01-13.
  25. ^ Disarmament Diplomacy: News Review – India and Pakistan Camped on Brink of War over Kashmir
  26. ^ "Near-Earth Objects Pose Threat, General Says"

External links

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-07-31/india/27204243_1_op-parakram-indian-soldiers-operation-parakram