Talk:Arvind Kejriwal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grabup (talk | contribs) at 18:07, 28 April 2024 (Undid revision 1221232568 by 103.52.220.45 (talk) Read WP:TALK#POSITIVE, which says “ Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article; not to criticize, pick apart, or vent about the current status of an article or its subject. This is especially true on the talk pages of biographies of living people.”). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kejriwal arrested

Kejariwal arrested today by ED, plz add । 45.124.142.140 (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as you have not cited reliable sources, without which no article should be changed. - Arjayay (talk) 16:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I am searching the source 45.124.142.140 (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the source
He is arrested today evening
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/arvind-kejriwal-arrested-by-enforcement-directorate-in-liquor-policy-case-5284679?_gl=1*1gfabjs*_ga*Mm9HdzBGbW1KZGxuemxISmhRcUNhUGpKaHRwcjZtblBubm9FT1p3NjNicEtkb3ZhTjVpUnJxZGYzOUtGYXoxUA
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/ed-arrests-delhi-chief-minister-arvind-kejriwal-in-liquor-policy-case-253073 45.124.142.140 (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

In Indian politics, controversies emerge regularly. It's unnecessary to list every daily controversy. To avoid negativity the controversies section has been removed. Not to be added or reverted before we discuss it here. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 21:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "Lawsuits" section, each part of the section eventually states that Kejriwal apologized. I'm not sure what purpose this section serves in the BLP. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 12:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please go through WP:CENSOR. You cannot delete a well sourced section, just because you feel "I'm not sure what purpose this section serves in the BLP." Aren't lawsuits part and parcel of every politician? Please start a WP:RFC. This section was sourced by WP:RS and criticism is a part of WP:BLP, if required we can always move it a new article instead of deleting it and retain a summary in the section. Please establish a consensus via WP:RFC before deleting it. I will be restoring it. --TheMandarin (talk) 05:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RFC isn't called before a discussion. I agree that there should be no separate "controversies" section, anything noteworthy should be integrated in proper sections and negative or positive things shouldn't be inflated. The controversies section is inflated negative aspects some of which are simply trivial. Not everything is included in articles. I don't see a similar controversies section on most major politician articles. MrMkG (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN referral

Greetings. I'm following up on a post at WP:BLPN regarding a recent edit. The source offered to support the content in this edit does not appear to be particularly reliable as to BLP content, nor is the content apparently worth any WP:WEIGHT in this subject's biography. It's just someone's opinion of him. So I removed it. See also WP:BLPSPS and WP:RS for more detail on third-party claims and reliable sources.

That said, the BLPN OP was unwilling to discuss the problematic edit here with its proponent. That's also unacceptable. Talk page it, please. Then follow up again at BLPN if there's a genuine failure to reach a consensus. If your consensus is hung up on reliability of a source, see WP:RSN. And WP:ANI is where abusive editing is remedied. Cheers! JFHJr () 22:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a single book cannot be used for conspiracy theory, and this has to be backed up by third party reliable sources. ---TheMandarin (talk) 14:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Court upholding arrest

TheMandarin, I seem to be running into trouble with my edits, so I am asking you for help. Can I add this:

The High Court of Delhi has ruled that Arvind Kejriwal's arrest in the liquor case is valid and rejected the CM's plea against his arrest.[1][2][3]

to this article? If so, where?-Haani40 (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being backed by multiple RS, this is a valid addition. Also, the lead is already bloated, so this can be to the relevant section or the main article related to arrest. --TheMandarin (talk) 19:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks!-Haani40 (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's already present and with better wording. This wording can make it sound like a conviction instead of a denial of dismissal of a case. MrMkG (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Anand, Akriti (2024-04-09). "'Arvind Kejriwal's arrest in liquor case valid': Delhi HC rejects CM's plea". mint. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
  2. ^ Ojha, Srishti (2024-04-09). "Arvind Kejriwal's plea against arrest dismissed, court says he 'conspired'". India Today. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
  3. ^ "Arvind Kejriwal To Stay In Jail, Petition Against Arrest Rejected". NDTV.com. 2019-02-22. Retrieved 2024-04-11.