Talk:Bangladesh

Broken link for citation 104

I tried following the link for citation 104 "The climate refugee challenge". The link appears to be broken. I believe the correct URL is: https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge

Please change the link to citation 104 to https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2018

Largest city is not Chitagong. --194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC) 194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done - thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

$751billion PPP (32nd) $273billion nominal (44th) Omer Roxy (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Drives on the right

People in Bangladesh drive on the right. The information is wrong Ryu tsui sen (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2018

The capital city and the largest city of Bangladesh is Dhaka and not Brahmanbaria. Fahmymalaysia (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 07:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2018

Article says Bangladesh is 14th in Corruption Perceptions Index while it's 145th. It's an important mistake and needs editing. Drq123 (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done as 14th is clearly stated here - Arjayay (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit war between Manipulateus and Vivaan65

Vivaan65 has notified me of the edit war with Manipulateus. From user contribs it appears both of them are relatively new to Wikipedia English (less than 100 edits and first edit being in this year). While looking at edit logs, it appears both of them yelling at each other and accusing one another of vandalism. In my opinion both of their edits are constructive, while both of them showing bit of knack towards POV pushing. I have made an edit to restore what I think would be more balanced version of this article. @Vivaan65: and @Manipulateus:, please work together to improve the article and avoid edit warring. Both of you have violated WP:3RR already. So, for any further disagreements, please take a moment to talk here before redoing and reverting edits. --nafSadh did say 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Let's settles the differences here first. Before that I am not going to accept a biased Bengalis only Bangladesh in the top section. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Also Vivaan65 has not been constructive anyone checking the logs can see he's been making unconstructive reverts that promotes a biased account of Bangladesh against the sources that I cited. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

See above, @Manipulateus. I have mentioned both of you and Vivaan65. Both of you had been warned for the 3RR violation yesterday. According to long held convention, when in dispute, and a discussion is ongoing, the article is kept in pre-dispute version. Please do not exacerbate. --nafSadh ^{did say} 15:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Do you have multiple accounts Nafsadh ? Just asking. --Manipulateus (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Why you ask? Also see this: User:Nafsadh/Doppelgangers. --nafSadh ^{did say} 18:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

@Aditya Kabir:, @Tarif Ezaz: Please help improve this Bangladesh article. Go though history of this article get some idea. I have already violated 3PR with Manipulateus.--Vivaan65 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

I request both of you to stop directly editing for the moment. Let us deescalate the situation. Can you guys tell what are you trying to achieve? May be other can lend a hand too. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows representation of editors from varying POV? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India POV that minimize the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh nationalism that is inclusive of Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims and I cannot reach a concensus with them even after citing sources (see also my talk page for my arguments) but know the article is not neutral (an undue weight given to Bengalis and the insignificance afforded to other ethnicities in the top section; check my edits in the history logs), what should I do? I am talking about the representation in terms of content not background of editors (that would be discrimination and also because I am aware that it would not make any sense because content does not always correlate with background or intention for example even a Pakistani editor could promote pro India content or an Indian editor could promote pro India content while making it appear that he is a Pakistani pretending to be Indian to put the blame on Indian editors).--Manipulateus (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)