Talk:Coagula

February 2007

Early on Kate is identified as a lesbian

Is she? As I recall, she wears a button that says something like "elect a transsexual lesbian to the White House", but never actually says she identifies as lesbian, so she may always have been intended to be bisexual. —Celithemis 06:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Coagula Revival

Can anyone confirm that Miss Pollack intends to bring back Coagula in any future date? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardsharp21 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation, please

I was looking for a fairly well-known but not mainstream piece of music software called Coagula. This is some pretty bizarre and specialized info to appear under the term without a disambiguation page...24.17.180.126 (talk) 19:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The purpose of a disambiguation page is to distinguish between similarly named articles. Since there is no article for Coagula (software), there is also no disambiguation page. When an article about the software is created, it is likely this page will be moved to Coagula (comics) and the main Coagula pagename used as the disambiguation page. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coagula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120529061952/http://www.techgnosis.com/gaiman.html to http://www.techgnosis.com/gaiman.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

NFC update

In contravention of WP:NFCC#8, there is no sourced prose or critical commentary on the appearance of this character that requires copyrighted material (File:Coagula.jpg) to illustrate. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Given the above, IAW the NFCC, are there objections to removing the unnecessary copyrighted material from the article? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Despite these explanations here, and linking hereto in my edit removing the NFC (- NFC IAW Talk:Coagula#NFC update), Aspects (talk · contribs) replaced File:Coagula.jpg without participating in this linked discussion, and while falsely saying that the file was removed without explanation (rv unexplained file deletion). Can anybody either explain that user's edits, or possibly introduce reliably-sourced critical commentary on Coagula's appearance so as to have actual reason to retain the NFC? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, you wrote so much in code, especially when I saw NFC and not the correct NFC, I thought there was no explanation. I would have stated that since the file is a picture of the character used in the infobox on the character's article to identify the subject it thereby passes WP:NFCC. If you still think it does not pass WP:NFCC and given no responses here for years, you should take the file to WP:FFD to see if you can reach a consensus for its deletion. Aspects (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

There's nothing written in this article the understanding of which is dependent upon or assisted by the NFC; in fact, no aspect of the character's appearance is mentioned at all, for that matter, failing the requirement of WP:NFCC#8. I'm unconcerned with the file's deletion or not; it just isn't needed in this article. Do you have any reliable sources which make critical commentary on Coagula's appearance, such that this NFC is needed? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics template

BattyBot (talk · contribs) recently repeatedly removed the |B-Class-X= parameters from the {{WikiProject Comics}} ([1], [2]) despite the template itself showing they were still in use. I replaced them twice IAW the template documentation ([3], [4]), going so far as to include a {{bots}} to preclude the error yet again. Most recently, GoingBatty (talk · contribs) has reverted yet again (including the third unexplained removal of template spacing), saying that The B-class parameters were recently {{diff2|1193582963|removed}} from {{tl|WikiProject Comics}} (as a result of this discussion at WT:COUNCIL). They have now, also, removed the |B-Class-X= code from the template example at Template:WikiProject Comics/doc, to retroactively excuse the bot's edits. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Fourthords: Look at this diff, and you'll see that the B-Class parameters were removed from Template:WikiProject Comics by MSGJ BEFORE my bot's edits to update the talk pages where the template is used. Your reversions led me to notice the documentation was not updated at the same time the parameters were removed from the template, so I manually updated it. (I also asked MSGJ to update the documentation when they update a template.) I'm sorry that my bot edits weren't clear, so I used a more explicit edit summary to explain the removal of the template parameters. Did you have a question about discussion I linked? GoingBatty (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't have any input or interest about the WikiProject templates or their functionality; I implement them because other editors find utility in them. The above talk-page post was just to clearly explain the recent back-and-forth to other editors, in case our edit summaries were too opaque. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 17:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)