Talk:George Galloway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 142.254.26.9 (talk) at 06:17, 27 January 2020 (→‎Request edit on 6 June 2019). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured article candidateGeorge Galloway is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 21, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted

Wives

How can Galloway have married Rima Husseini in 2005 when he was still married to Amineh Abu-Zayyad until 2009? If he married Husseini only in an Islamic ceremony, it will not have ever had legal force in the UK, in which case she was never his wife and should be removed from the "Spouse(s)" section of the infobox; if it was a civil marriage, then he would have been guilty of bigamy (and the Husseini marriage would still have been void).

To my knowledge, Wikipedia does not endorse "non-marriages" (i.e. putative marriages or marriage-like ceremonies that provably have no legal force) being listed as marriages in this way, in which case Husseini should be removed.

--Vabadus91 (talk) 20:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the current source for his marriage to Amineh Abu-Zayyad marriage, Maya Wolfe-Robinson in The Guardian seems to ask the same question. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It says he married his current wife in a religious ceremony and then married her in a civil ceremony after his divorce. So there is nothing ambiguous about his current marital statue. I do not see any reason to mention that his religious marriage was not recognized under English law, but his consequent civil marriage was. TFD (talk) 01:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am still confused, unless he was a bigamist. Zezen (talk) 04:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abruptly leaves meeting in Oxford, February 2013

We do not need a whole subsection about this. One sentence would be enough.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 6 June 2019

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

  • For edit requests relating to a conflict of interest, please use {{edit COI}}.
  • If you are partially-blocked from editing the page, please use {{edit partially-blocked}}.
  • If the page is protected, use one of the following:
    • {{SPER}} for semi-protected pages
    • {{EPER}} for extended-confirmed protected pages
    • {{TPER}} for template-protected pages
    • {{FPER}} for fully-protected pages
    • {{IAER}} for interface admin protected pages

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.this whole articvle should be edited to paint a clearer non biased picture of him and what he has not as anti-semtic canon where he is portrayed as the perscuted victim of a "zionist" conspricy. If you think i am wrong replace every time isreal and jewish people are mentioned with palestinan and islam and vice versa and see if it does not read like it was written by a member of teh alt-right— Preceding unsigned comment added by Geofan1978 (talkcontribs) 02:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make any specific requests backed up with reliable sources.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well you could start by reverting a few changes made each day by the banned paid shill. Do you think that would help? or should I quote George:

"Now I know that standards have slipped in the last few years in Washington[Wikipedia], but for a lawyer[Editor] you are remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice[conflict of interest]. I am here today but last week you already found me guilty. You traduced my name around the world without ever having asked me a single question, without ever having contacted me, without ever having written to me or telephoned me, without any attempt to contact me whatsoever, and you call that justice." - George Galloway, Senate hearing (17 May 2005). No, let Wikipedias damaged reputation stand.

Conflict With Robert Maxwell

It seems to me that George Galloway exposing Robert Maxwell as an agent of Mossad, (or at least his accusation of that), with Maxwell’s death following a couple of weeks later, would be a topic that warrants inclusion in this article.

Is there any reason it has not been included?

Rantedia (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]