Talk:Peter Strzok: Difference between revisions
PackMecEng (talk | contribs) m →Why doesn't Lisa Page have her own page?: +reflisttalk |
PackMecEng (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Looks like some new news with Strzok's involvment on the [[Michael Flynn]] case.[https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/495627-flynn-documents-are-the-smoking-gun-on-comeys-fbi][https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/30/fbi-closed-flynn-case-early-2017-peter-strzok-orde/][https://www.newsmax.com/us/strzok-page/2020/04/30/id/965493/][https://www.foxnews.com/politics/strzok-stopped-bureau-from-ending-flynn-probe-despite-lack-of-derogatory-evidence-unsealed-documents-reveal][https://www.foxnews.com/media/brett-tolman-peter-strzok-was-at-the-heart-of-the-trump-russia-storm] Altering interview notes and trying to purposly get Flynn fired. The Hill reporting notes from director of counterintelligence on what Strzok said {{tq|"What's our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"}}.[https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/495401-fbi-officials-discussed-trying-to-get-flynn-to-lie-in-interview-get] [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) |
Looks like some new news with Strzok's involvment on the [[Michael Flynn]] case.[https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/495627-flynn-documents-are-the-smoking-gun-on-comeys-fbi][https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/30/fbi-closed-flynn-case-early-2017-peter-strzok-orde/][https://www.newsmax.com/us/strzok-page/2020/04/30/id/965493/][https://www.foxnews.com/politics/strzok-stopped-bureau-from-ending-flynn-probe-despite-lack-of-derogatory-evidence-unsealed-documents-reveal][https://www.foxnews.com/media/brett-tolman-peter-strzok-was-at-the-heart-of-the-trump-russia-storm] Altering interview notes and trying to purposly get Flynn fired. The Hill reporting notes from director of counterintelligence on what Strzok said {{tq|"What's our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"}}.[https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/495401-fbi-officials-discussed-trying-to-get-flynn-to-lie-in-interview-get] [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
Not sure of a purposed text yet, but this is pretty fresh and something people should keep an eye on. I am sure this article will become popular fairly soon. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 20:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 1 May 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Strzok article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why doesn't Lisa Page have her own page?
Both Strzok and Page are most famous for their text messages, and the role they have played in the Russia Collusion investigations by the IC Muller, as well as various Congressional committees.
Yet there is no Wikipedia page for Page, it refers here.
She seems as well known and important as Strzok to the story, why does she not rate her own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 21:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Lisa Page is only notable for this particular story linking her to Peter Strzok. Hence her story can be fully covered here. See WP:BLP1E as the relevant policy. — JFG talk 23:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
As of 12/2/2019 Lisa Page has apparently become more of a news item on her own: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by AltSyzygy (talk • contribs) 22:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
References
Fox News Commentary
Why does this section exist? Should there be sections for CNN Commentary, MSNBC Commentary, NYT or WaPo, etc? Does every article about a controversial political figure contain a section like this? I don't think so ! WBcoleman (talk) 23:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Why was my edit undone
I added citations referencing the actual text messages and they were undone by Volunteer Marek. A link to primary documentation seems way better than links to news articles *about* the text messages. Am I missing something here? Nweil (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
OPR investigation
The FBI OPR investigation of Strzok is highly relevant to his career as an FBI agent.
The data provided is (a) factual, (b) accurate, and (c) sourced.
The primary source for the information is the head of the FBI's OPR. The secondary source is Strzok himself (since he filed the letter as an exhibit to his lawsuit against the Attorney General.
- a & b: so what? c: Wrong. It's two WP:PRIMARY sources. Read the link. --Calton | Talk 07:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
New Documents
Looks like some new news with Strzok's involvment on the Michael Flynn case.[1][2][3][4][5] Altering interview notes and trying to purposly get Flynn fired. The Hill reporting notes from director of counterintelligence on what Strzok said "What's our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"
.[6] PackMecEng (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure of a purposed text yet, but this is pretty fresh and something people should keep an eye on. I am sure this article will become popular fairly soon. PackMecEng (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- Biography articles needing attention
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- District of Columbia articles needing attention
- C-Class FBI articles
- High-importance FBI articles
- WikiProject FBI articles
- FBI articles needing attention
- C-Class U.S. Presidents articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Presidents articles
- WikiProject U.S. Presidents articles
- U.S. Presidents articles needing attention
- United States articles needing attention
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Law enforcement articles
- Mid-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- C-Class Espionage articles
- Low-importance Espionage articles
- C-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- C-Class Donald Trump articles
- Mid-importance Donald Trump articles
- WikiProject Donald Trump articles