Talk:Piers Morgan: Difference between revisions
→Great interview: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Philip Cross (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1097935617 by 172.197.107.167 (talk) WP:FORUM, no suggestion as to how to improve this article |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Peirs is Welsh not Irish. This should be changed. [[User:Akmal94|Akmal94]] ([[User talk:Akmal94|talk]]) 01:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
Peirs is Welsh not Irish. This should be changed. [[User:Akmal94|Akmal94]] ([[User talk:Akmal94|talk]]) 01:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Great interview == |
|||
We’ll done Piers. That interview with Mickey Rourke was brilliant [[Special:Contributions/172.197.107.167|172.197.107.167]] ([[User talk:172.197.107.167|talk]]) 11:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:36, 13 July 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Piers Morgan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Covid restrictions and Antigua
The Irish News are reporting that Morgan has been accused of hypocrisy for making repeated calls for people to comply with Covid restrictions and then travelling to Antigua over Christmas 2020 in breach of the rules. See https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2021/01/06/news/calls-for-piers-morgan-to-be-dismissed-from-gmb-amid-claims-he-broke-covid-rules-to-holiday-in-caribbean-2178423/. Greenshed (talk) 01:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Piers Morgan quits his job on ITV after storming off stage on GMB.
Yes Piers Morgan quit his job at ITV after storming off stage during Good Morning Britain. Here are some links: https://www.lotuseaters.com/the-podcast-of-the-lotus-eaters-85-10-03-21 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/10/itv-market-value-loses-200m-as-piers-morgan-leaves-good-morning-britain https://www.itv.com/news/2021-03-10/piers-morgan-says-woke-crowd-has-not-cancelled-him-and-he-will-re-emerge-from-temporary-hibernation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.122.40 (talk) 21:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- What is your point? Are you going to edit the article? Your theguardian and itv-dot-com sources seem noteworthy/trustable under wiki common policy.. Have at it! -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 15:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- All fully sourced in the article now, thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello and how are you @ @Martinevans123: ? Re your (or your BOT's?) edit of my personally, fully intended Talk page comment diff is shown here in which you or your BOT changed my text from, "have at it" to --> "have a look at it" -- Umm. No. (Not what I wrote or intended.) I meant what I wrote. Please get a handle on your BOT, or tendencies to edit Talk Pages, as it is definitely *POOR FORM* to edit peoples' TALK comments directly. You are putting words in their mouths that way. Your BOT (or you) could "comment" a new comment, after their comment, with a proposed edit or suggestion or correction or grammatical/typographical fix, but, don't edit what I, a human, drafted in my own words please. I hope you will take this lesson to heart and it'll serve as a lesson to others too as a better workaround. Thanks for listening. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 16:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note Peter. I do sincerely apologise. I don't have any bots, thanks. I certainly won't be editing your comments again. What does "have at it" mean? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello and how are you @ @Martinevans123: ? Re your (or your BOT's?) edit of my personally, fully intended Talk page comment diff is shown here in which you or your BOT changed my text from, "have at it" to --> "have a look at it" -- Umm. No. (Not what I wrote or intended.) I meant what I wrote. Please get a handle on your BOT, or tendencies to edit Talk Pages, as it is definitely *POOR FORM* to edit peoples' TALK comments directly. You are putting words in their mouths that way. Your BOT (or you) could "comment" a new comment, after their comment, with a proposed edit or suggestion or correction or grammatical/typographical fix, but, don't edit what I, a human, drafted in my own words please. I hope you will take this lesson to heart and it'll serve as a lesson to others too as a better workaround. Thanks for listening. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 16:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Rearrangement by User:Philip Cross
I have restructured the article so that it now pivots on the change in Morgan's career in 2004. Despite his effective switch from primarily working in newspapers to television personality around that time, certain sections are split between the two. The passage on Meghan, Duchess of Sussex is the most obvious example. The controversies/feuds section being near the end of the article meant duplication was inevitable. The likely adjudication of Ofcom on his comments about the Duchess should mean their decision will not be repeated in three sections. Philip Cross (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- The bigger problem, IMHO, is that more than half of the article is spent on detailing these controversies. Is it really that important of an aspect of this person's career; or is this just the usual WP:NOTNEWS type of coverage that is a fair bit UNDUE? I wouldn't be against keeping it, I just think it needs to be trimmed down... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "was a English broadcaster ..." to "is an English broadcaster ...". 182.48.131.97 (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done for now: Is he currently on a show? Please provide WP:Reliable sources of this, for the change to be made. Terasail[✉] 14:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Ethnciity
Peirs is Welsh not Irish. This should be changed. Akmal94 (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Journalism articles
- Mid-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- B-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report