Talk:Ron Walsh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 17:33, 23 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Requested move 13 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. The move arguments are persuasive: there's no effective coverage of any other Ron Walsh. I find rough consensus to move. The dab page will be retained to serve people looking for the soap character or Ronald Walsh. Cúchullain t/c 14:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Ron Walsh (footballer)Ron Walsh – More notable than the other Ron Walsh, some obscure soapie character who doesn't even have their own section. Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 23:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC) --Relisted.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that the soapie guy isn't the primary topic, but the footballer isn't very notable either, so I've created a dab page. If anyone really disagrees, then the dab page can be moved to Ron Walsh (disambiguation). The-Pope (talk) 12:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. No primary topic. DAB works well enough. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support no disambiguation page needed, only the footballer has an article (the politician is Ronald, but not Ron). Peter James (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.