User talk:123Hedgehog456

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 123Hedgehog456 (talk | contribs) at 03:33, 19 July 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, 123Hedgehog456! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! WayneSlam 19:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Warning vandals

Hi, I wonder if you've seen the TW menu that offers warnings for vandals. It is convenient and should automatically put in headings for a new month when appropriate. Thanks for your efforts to combat vandalizm! Nadiatalent (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Reviewing

Hi! Regarding this edit that you reviewed as approved, I'm sorry but I had to reverse you because the new name added wasn't in the reference cited. Not all vandalism is blatant, it is often subtle; e.g. changing demographic or sports statistics. This can require a reviewer to fact-check the article and its references before approving or rejecting an edit. Sometimes when I'm still not sure after doing all that, I don't do anything and leave it to editors more familiar with that particular article. Pending changes is still pretty new here, so there's not a lot of documentation on any single "right way" to do reviewing, but I've described some of what I put into it. Hope you find it helpful! --Ashanda (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PublicHedgehog456

I have deleted both the redirects at PublicHedgehog456 (talk · contribs · count) to this account. I'm not familiar with your situation here, but if that was a former account of yours you need to log in as that account and make those edits. Regards, Syrthiss (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, I'm sure I put a reason in when I made it, because it's for public places. 123Hedgehog456 16:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You hadn't, but thats fine. I see you've logged in with the other account and made the edits. :) Thanks! Syrthiss (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping me! That's strange, because I did put in a reason when I created the account. 123Hedgehog456 16:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that I hadn't seen. I was referring to the edit summary I saw when the page popped up in recentchanges. I tried to look at the account creation logs, but nothing was coming up. At your discretion, you might place a notice on your userpage for 123 that public is an alternate account of yours (like my note on my userpage about syrcatbot (talk · contribs · count)). That may help to keep nosy administrators from bugging you needlessly. Syrthiss (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I'm redesigning my userpage, so I'll include a note about it. Thanks for your help, anyway. 123Hedgehog456 17:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For fighting vandalism, and for noticing the "sad face" on your profile for not having any barnstars to treasure, I hereby grant you the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! Keep up the good work! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aww, thank you, I really like it. 123Hedgehog456 19:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! You are very kind. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu

Ubuntu, did you get it?

Reply on my talk.

Crystal Linux Talk to Crystal Linux... 23:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IRC chat

Hello, there is an upcoming, very informal discussion on IRC on the freenode channel ##chzzalpha connect (quick webchat link) on the 6th March 2011 at 17:00 UTC concerning ways to improve help over IRC, and other matters relating to Wiki?edia channels in general, but mostly about #wikipedia-en-help.

This is just a friendly, informal chat. Nothing official, no fixed agenda. There is nothing 'secretive' about it - anyone is quite welcome. Some of you had a chat there, the other day. We wanted to invite them to carry on discussions, at a prearranged time - and thought it courteous to ask group contacts and channel founders too. Or if you signed up manually.

If you aren't at all interested, feel free to remove yourself from the names we've spammed this to, which is in User:123Hedgehog456/IRC informal chat users. If you didn't sign up, well, people have been adding loads of names to the list, so someone might have accidentally added your name.

Thank you,  Chzz  ►  and 123Hedgehog456 19:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Message made by Chzz, with help from 123Hedgehog456.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of 123Hedgehog456 (talk) at 22:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Delivery Successful

Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (IRC chat) was completed successfully. Happy editing!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 22:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

Jimmy Ibbotson

Now I have to deal with yet another cyber ghost who thinks he knows more about my own personal life than I do. I AM JIMMY IBBOTSON. I AM MAKING CHANGES TO THE PAGES CONCERNING MY LIFE, MY CHILDREN, MY EX-WIVES, AND MY MUSIC. I am not vandalizing, as you say, these pages or the changes I am making. WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT I SIMPLY ASK FOR A SMALL AMOUNT OF PRIVACY WHEN IT COMES TO MY CHILDREN? I WANT THE PERSONAL LIFE SECTION REMOVED. AS IT HAS BEEN ENTERED BY PEOPLE WHO DO NOT KNOW ME, IT IS VERY INCORRECT! Ibbymusic (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC) JIMMY IBBOTSON[reply]

Hmm, I'm not saying that you aren't Jimmy Ibbotson, but the removal of content from pages without explanation is generally frowned upon. If you are, I believe you: but you need to contact the Wikimedia Foundation and tell them. I'm not even sure if you can request the removal of an encyclopedic content section, but if it incorrect, feel free to remove it, providing a good edit summary with a reliable source containing proof it is incorrect. But keep in mind that people will come along and probably find a source and add the correct information. 123Hedgehog456 19:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This seems to be the major problem with wikipedia. ANYONE can contribute whatever they want, about WHOEVER they want, without accurate sources. Yet, the actual individual being written about CANNOT make changes without contacting the wikipedia foundation? You must be joking. I made my final edit to the personal life section. That's all the public needs to know about my family. Can you understand that, and respect that please?

I do not have the time, nor energy, to correct all of the other mistakes that are contained on many of the other pages some crazed, obsessed fan has written about me.

Jimmy IbbotsonIbbymusic (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've just got confused at this point. #wikipedia-en-help connect it may be advisable to click the green connect link, type in a name and press the button. There's people there who can definitely help you. 123Hedgehog456 20:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ibbymusic's comment "without reliable sources" is wrong. Most legitimate looking edits still may be reverted if we can't verify them easily. We've got a whole policy on Biographies of living people which was created to stop unsourced addition of content. ManishEarthTalkStalk 08:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Nice way of promoting ACC

You've got a nice way of promoting ACC in your signature!
PS: you might want to shorten the [http://toolserver.og/~acc Request an account] to [[tools:~acc|Request an account]]. It makes the signature a wee bit smaller ManishEarthTalkStalk 13:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks. I've added the new link and it looks a lot better now! Hope the pending requests come streaming in, I'm bored. --123Hedgehog456 : 16:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm dropping by to say the same thing. It's a great way to encourage users to create accounts. I only worked ACC in the dead of night so most of the requests seem to have come from India. Quite frankly, it was totally boring so I stopped. I'd like to get active again there eventually though. Anyway, it's a great idea.
PS: I like your page notice. Regards, 07:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Aww, thanks. My pagenotice seems a bit mad, but I was in a mad mood when I made it. I hope lots of people start promoting ACC, or at least using it. --123Hedgehog456 : 07:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I would pick up the idea of promoting ACC, but I don't know if I could factor it in to my sig well enough.
Hmmmm... Swarm X - Create an account!
What do you think? Swarm X 08:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since most of my work is vandalism reversion, my signature ends up on a lot of talk pages, so ACC is promoted a lot. --123Hedgehog456 : Create an account! 08:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. Have you previously edited under a different account? You come across as a long time editor, yet you've only been here for less than two months. Swarm X 08:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my userpage contains details. I was here on a previous account for about a year, can't remember, before forgetting my password. --123Hedgehog456 : Create an account! 08:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Facepalm Facepalm. I'm blind. But I guess I'm also clueful for guessing that. Anyway, I'm spiraling off topic. Hope ACC picks up for you. Not that it ever does, but accept my sentiments. Regards, Swarm X 08:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Slam Dunk Award

File:SlamDunkActionShot3.jpg
Slakr's Slam Dunk Award

For maintaining awesome cool, being completely professional, showing excellent judgment, and basically scoring a slam dunk (in my eyes) while dealing with a hot-tempered user, I hereby award you your very own slam dunk.

Use it wisely. Don't waste it on schoolyard pickup games: save it for that game-winning, send-'em-packing moment. :P Heh, anyway, keep up the great work, and cheers =) --slakrtalk / 19:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

Wikipedia:ACC tool users' pledge, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:ACC tool users' pledge and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:ACC tool users' pledge during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Oaths

[1].  Chzz  ►  22:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

Your sig

Could you not link to ACC in your signature? We want most people to create an account the normal way because it's faster and easier for them. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 15:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mail list bounce

Just so you know because of excessive bounces coming from your current email, the system has unsubscribed you from accounts-enwiki-l. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bretforton

Hi. Nice to see the improvements. What do you think of that dingy Planet Produce image? I tried to get rid of it last year but User:Zaps93, who created it, reverted, and I couldn't be bothered to pursue it. One thing that the image is doing currently is creating white space to the left of the infobox, so, if it has to remain, it would be best to relocate it right at the bottom, presumably with some short reference to the company, which has a website. (I'm also wondering whether some of the Fleece stuff should be moved to the Fleece article.) Best. --GuillaumeTell 18:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, I agree with all your suggested improvements. It'd be nice to describe industry in the area, and the education section needs quite a bit of improvement to fully describe standards of education in the village. Also, it does seem quite ridiculous to have the section on the Fleece bigger than its own article. I'll try and find a few reliable sources about industry and education, and move the image. And improve the Fleece section. It'd be nice to have some help. --123Ħeðŋeħøŋ456 18:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

Hello, 123Hedgehog456. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs
22:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

I'm really sorry, I've just had to change my email address and I forgot to change in on Wikipedia. I've changed it now, so could you please re-email me? Thanks, 123Ħeðŋeħøŋ456 09:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, its not needed. Nevermind. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs
09:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enquiry

hello why huggle doesnt work in ar.wikipedia.org , i am rollback in arabic wikipedia , there are translation for the program here [2] , put i dont know what to do to make the programm active in arabic wikipedia. i am sorry for my languege because i Do not speak English fluently

thanks--ASammour (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 03:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]