User talk:Awesome Aasim

こんにちは

ℹ

This user is a native of the United States of America.

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

This user contributes using Microsoft Windows.

This user contributes using a
Microsoft Surface.

This user contributes using Microsoft Edge.

This user contributes using an
Android phone.

♂This contributor to Wikipedia is male.

This user is a Muslim. This person is very proud to be a Muslim.

ADHDThis user has ADHD.

JavaThis user can program in Java.

js-NThis user is fluent in JavaScript.

LuaThis user can program in Lua.

This editor is a WikiGnome.

This user is signed up for the Feedback Request Service.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user is a recent changes patroller with Twinkle!

This user uses Huggle to revert vandalism.

This user fights vandalism with Huggle and Twinkle.
Sometimes simultaneously...

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

RWThis user uses RedWarn to fight vandalism.

This user has both RedWarn and Twinkle, and may use them together!RW

Search user languages

I can't archive my talk page. But Wikipedia's bots can.

WikiLove

From User:RuiyuShen

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Nice heart! $\sideset {_{R}^{u}}{_{u}^{y}}\prod _{\clubsuit }^{i}$ ${}_{S}^{h}\!\Omega _{n}^{e}$ 04:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

From User:Path slopu

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 06:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

From User:RuiyuShen

Your user talk page is really awesome :) RuiyuShen 11:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Directory

• To communicate with me on wikiHow matters: wikiHow:User talk:Awesome-Aasim (post)
• To communicate with me on Fandom matters: wikia:community:User talk:Awesome Aasim
• To communicate with me on other wiki matters: Special:CentralAuth/Awesome Aasim then click on the appropriate wiki and find my talk page there.
• To communicate with me on cross-wiki issues: meta:User talk:Awesome Aasim (edit • new section)
• To communicate with me privately Special:EmailUser/Awesome Aasim

Talk

Before posting, please note the following:

• I am only a human. I make mistakes from time to time. Unless if the mistake is repeated, there is no need to warn me and I will likely thank you for reverting my error.
• Let's keep my talk page clean. Cursing is a bad habit and is not super professional. If you have trouble with cursing, you can view this wikiHow article that will help you stop cursing.
• Wikipedia matters go on this talk page only. If you have matters related to other projects, please see the talk pages for the full list of wikis that I edit.
• Check your CAPS LOCK key. Messages in ALL CAPS are also not considered civil. Use bold text or italicized text or underlined text for emphasis.
• I am not always online, but you may be able to get a faster reply if you email me. Note that if there is abuse, I may share the contents with administrators.

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"

• Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"

• In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record

• Obituary: Vami_IV

• Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday

• WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Asian witchcraft on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Evaluation of Vector 2022

Hi, I've gone through the RfC regarding Vector 2022 and beneath is the list of things that I could come up with. It's mostly either general themes or repeating conversations, or individual comments that attracted a lot of support !votes. It is smaller that I expected; I found that people either loved V22 and didn't have much to say, or hated it and would prefer WMF to scrap it altogether.

• A fix to the general waste of space waste of space, particularly on the sides. This was the main theme through most of question 1, so should be high priority.
• Make the user talk link not hidden by default.
• Add responsive mode on mobile, as a toggle.
• Provide a way to hide a username, possibly through a check box in the Appearance menu.
• A thinner right-side toolbar.
• Fix the poor autocomplete feature of V22's search bar, which doesn't link redirects and often gives nonsensical suggestions.
• There is still a lot of community pushback against V22 altogether, particularly with WMF's conduct when rolling out the skin. The WMF will need to solve this before community adoption of the skin is widespread.

Before I post it, I'd like to have you have a look at it and see if you have any feedback, or anything you think I've missed or should add. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 06:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)