User talk:Doug Weller
The current date and time is 13 May 2024 T 00:15 UTC.
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first... |
| Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia. If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click here to start a new topic.
|
| First, please remember that I am not trying to attack you, demean you, or hurt you in any way. I am only trying to protect the integrity of this project. If I did something wrong, let me know, but remember that I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please keep your comments civil. If you vandalize this page or swear at me, you will not only decrease the likelihood of a response, your edits could get you blocked. (see WP:NPA) When posting, do not assume I know which article you are talking about. If you leave a message saying "Why did you revert me?", I will not know what you mean. If you want a response consisting of something other than "What are you talking about", please include links and, if possible, diffs in your message. At the very least, mention the name of the article or user you are concerned with. If you are blocked from editing, you cannot post here, but your talk page is most likely open for you to edit. To request a review of your block, add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. (replace reason with why you think you should not be blocked.) I watch the talk pages of everyone I block, so I will almost definitely see you make your request. If I am making edits (check Special:Contributions/Doug Weller) and I do not answer your request soon, or you cannot edit your talk page for some reason, you can try sending me an email. Please note, however, that I rarely check my email more than a few times a day, so it may be a couple of hours before I respond. Administrators: If you see me do something that you think is wrong, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo my actions. I would, however, appreciate it if you let me know what I did wrong, so that I can avoid doing it in the future. |
You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise.
Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.
UTRS Account Request
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Dougweller (talk)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
SPLC
Gee, I injected my own opinion about SPLC and ADL because the articles involved have their own biased POV about the subjects of those articles, in which they are characterized as allegedly "right-wing." I will keep editing them until you stop labeling those persons and organizations as such or allow for parity. Wikipedia has a reputation now as the province of left-wing petty tyrants masquerading as editors. ESAD, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.242.83 (talk • contribs)
- Adding your own opinion is a violation of basic policies WP:VERIFY and WP:NOR. The articles you are discussing are John Tanton, who is not described as right-wing, a term not even in his article, NumbersUSA also not described as right-wing, and Virginia Abernethy. She's described as a leader of the radical right (which she might well agree with, by the way), but we don't call her right-wing, we say that the SPLC sees her as a leader. In all the discussions we've had about the SPLC it's been agreed that it is a reliable source for such descriptions as long was we make we attribute them to the SPLC and don't state as fact that the subject is, eg, right-wing. And the lead to her article says nothing about her being right-wing, that's a mention further down. Copying this to the IP's talk page. Dougweller (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
interests
I just want to fuck your sister, and laugh at you activists, I mean no harm to anyone. You don't want none (Jewish provocateurs) won't be none. Take care
I don't have a problem with Jews, it's the Zionism and Templars shit they try to run my life with. Can't even work cuz of it.
- Clear enough to add to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unavailable.undisclosed. Dougweller (talk) 12:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
Please comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Christopher Riordan Jones
Hi, Honestly I didn't know there was a Conflict of Interest issue on Wikipedia (I didn't read every guideline). Should I just take my entry down? I figured most authors just posted info about their work where it applies and set up their own bios (since they know the exact dates when their works were copy-written and published and such). I'm not sure what to do now. I only just created an account today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spawnoftyphon (talk • contribs) 16:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Spawnoftyphon. Thanks for this, thanks very much. Sadly I don't think you meet our criteria at WP:AUTHOR. And we don't add self-published books to articles, or in fact almost any books unless they have their own articles or the author does. I see you have found out how to ask for your article to be deleted, and as I am an Administrator I can and have done that. I really appreciate your attitude and cooperation. Now I am not saying that you are Christopher and it would be improper and very much against policy for me to try to suggest who you are in real life, but Riordan? Do you know if Christopher Riordan Jones is related to Rick Riordan? Dougweller (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ping Spawnoftyphon. Dougweller (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I am Christopher Riordan Jones, and no I am not related to Rick. I would be very sad if I was. He is the antithesis to everything I strive towards as a writer. Rick Riordan claims his works are devoted to preventing bullying and supporting those who are different, yet his books are devoted to the perspectives of blind demigods and gods who go around slaughtering monsters (specifically tragic creatures who have had their perspectives denied). Monsters have their perspectives in my books at least. I take some solace in that. Spawnoftyphon (talk) 17:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. Ref the Fried Bread page source for "fried slice" the article you have linked does not give a source for the use of the word "Fried Slice". If you read the article, the author is not calling fried bread fried slice - "for those of us who like to laugh in the face of heart disease and add that pièce de résistance, fried bread. Personally, I never truly feel I'm eating a full breakfast without a fried slice (of bread)."
The "of bread" should be added. I have never seen the term fried slice used in the UK to describe fried bread. You can, of course have a fried slice of bread, but the term a fried slice is not used.
Hope that helps
109.153.178.238 (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
human history correction
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/18-million-year-old-skull-indicates-there-may-have-been-just-one-human-species. Hello. This is a link for you to check on what you called my misunderstanding of the discoveries last year. I apologize for not including the dates and names or other facts. I thought I was posting for your review only. You have educates me on the use of your system. Thank you. As well the american cival war is incorrect in it claims. The southern states receeded because of the north was keeping their slaves. The south was the French run quarter and the north belonged to the English. The English won of course. I think it was dumbars proclamation that started it off. Not the emancipation proclamation. I hope I am replying to your message to me. If I did it wrong I apologize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Any rism (talk • contribs) 19:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The National Alliance still exists. See:
www.natall.com
The new Chairman is William White Williams.
See article by the SPLC called "Triumph of the Will"
and stop reverting edits that you have no idea are valid.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.34.131.84 (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Unsourced claims about living people can and often should be removed, see WP:BLP. Dougweller (talk) 09:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
A Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mughal Lohar duck again
Hey there, I think it's duck season again. New account Special:Contributions/SM2468 as compared to previously blocked Special:Contributions/468SM. Notice the lack of imagination with the name and similar pattern of editing on the same area of articles. Good day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Lack of imagination, good judgement. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement
Can you delete some last versions of History of Brahmin diet. They ripped off [1]-[2] Bladesmulti (talk) 13:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)