User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

Barnstar!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		For your hard work using the admin tools to keep the wiki clean. Keep it up! Ashbey…whisper… 22:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

AMERICAN MONGREL

Have people become PC crazy?

I am getting really tired of defending the term "American Mongrel". Are you more than one race? More than 5 nationalities? 300 plus years of ancestry in the US and part Amer-Indian? What should one call the afore? An "English/Irish/Scot/Dane/Dutch/German/French/India-Indian AND Amer-Indian/Black/Creole American"?

Get real.

Many people have zero idea of their ancestry & wouldn't inclusiveness be better?

• I* think the term "American Mongrel" would be inclusive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joniwells (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

American Mongrel

I think you are too sensitive to the classic definition of mongrel. Do you like MUTT better? Our next President (to whom I donated much money) referred to himself as such. I live in So Cal and we are not only a mutli-ethnic but increasing a mixed society. I'm guessing you are not exposed to such as all of my background (Heinz 57 plus a dash of other spices) think the term American Mongrel is both amusing and appropiate.

Why don't you get out of your box ask some multi-cultural people (of all colors and backgrounds) what THEY think?

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Buckarootoo

The page "Stephen Epstein" title is far too generic. There are multiple physicians with that name. While the easiest thing to do would be to change the title of the article (which I cannot seem to do), the next best thing is to start a new page for the single person that article refers to, but make the title of that article more specific.

This will allow other people with the same name a point of reference from which to create individual pages.

In short, Stephen E. Epstein, MD, (famous though he may be) should not monopolize "Stephen Epstein" on Wikipedia.

Buckarootoo (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Page moving

Ah, now I see. Renaming a page is called moving a page.

Newbie error.

Hope you see what I was trying to do ... Buckarootoo (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Fortunately, at least one of your recent edits appeared to be constructive and has been praised. Please use the vandalism monitor for any great edits you would like to make, and read the problem page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 11:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, glad you liked it. :) — Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 19:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

user:168.170.203.240

Hello, Gogo Dodo. user:168.170.203.240 does nothing, but vandalising. IMO it is about time to block the user indefinetly. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

User page

No problem. I just blocked the IP as they made another edit. Strange person, keeps removing the word "game" or "games. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes they all look the same. Even if the IPs are from Florida and New Jersey. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Dallas Off Road Bicycle Association

Why was my page deleted?

I am a member of the Dallas Off Road Bicycle Association and there are are few of us that are working together to create our club a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MTBstig (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Pushtun soapboxer

I noticed that you blocked user:Checkeredcar for soapboxing on various Afghanistan-Pakistan pages. He's back as user:Redneck12, posting a shorter version of the material with all the same problems. He's also using IPs user:77.241.230.242 and user:91.75.74.12. Any chance these could get blocked as well? Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 12:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll be watching for more socks. Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 00:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

thanks

Just a quick note to thank you for the vandalism revert on my talkpage, cheers! Spitfire^Tally-ho! 19:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Survivor Talk page

No, that's fine, I'm pretty new to this as it is. ;) Thanks for changing that. Veego laberge (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Dwarfism

Hey thanks for fixing the spacing. All I did was delete some stupid line that made fun of dwarfs. Just trying to keep it professional here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reebokj18 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

December's Keep

The words may be by a non-notable writer, but the music is by Frederic Chopin; also it's not about a recording, but a song. I don't think Speedy A9 ("An article about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article has never existed or has been deleted.") applies. Could you please reinstate the article. PamD (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The deletion of Going to School page

Dear Gogo Dodo,

Hello! I hope you are doing well.

I am a new user of the Wiki and I had contributed an article on an organization called Going to School. The deletion log says that it was deleted due to copyright infringement. I do not understand how that could be as I had myself written that article.

Can you also please tell me what I can do in order to have the article back on the site?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best, Goingtoschool

--Goingtoschool (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Going to School Page

Hello again!

Thanks for your prompt reply. However, there has not been a copyright infringement as I work with Going to School and we own the material on the website.

I look forward to hearing from you.

--Goingtoschool (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Going to School Page

Hello!

Can you please tell me how we can go about getting a GNU Free Documentation License?

Also, if the owner of the content agrees to share it on Wiki, should that not be enough?

--Goingtoschool (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Message from Imunchies!

Hey um gogo dogo plz dont delete my post plz!!!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imunchies! (talk • contribs) 22:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delet my article

hey you deleted my article that hapend to be awsome posum!!!

dont delete my articles or il post that gogo dodo is a mean person thingy on my user page!!!

( T_T mean guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imunchies! (talk • contribs)

Sob Sob!!!

Jew is so evil

Love, Imunchies! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imunchies! (talk • contribs) 22:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Uh O no u didnt!!!

Wiki is so a social site how do you think so many ppl hate meh?

so um no more deleting stuff!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imunchies! (talk • contribs) 22:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

pplz

plz dont delet my acount im sry i didnt mean to afend you (ps.jew meant you) but i was angry at you for being a deleter. so plz forgive me??? plz dude dont plz???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imunchies! (talk • contribs) 22:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Imunchies!

Just letting you know in case you don't have it in your watchlist, I replied to your keep !vote. Have a nice day! :) — neuro^(talk) 22:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I wonder...

...if I could bother you with another script request? You did a great job on the XfD closer but I don't want to sound like someone who just asks and asks and asks... Anyway, running into a bunch of mistaken CSD taggings all the time, I really want some script that makes it easier to decline them without having to type the reasons all the time. I got a bunch of things I'd like in such a script but before bombarding you with them, I first wanted to ask whether you would be willing to think about scripting such a script for me :-) Regards SoWhy 10:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

What, you don't just delete everything on sight? =) Just kidding. It's an interesting idea and I can look into it. But I'd really like to finish up the CloseXFD script. I actually worked on it over the weekend and I got it put a "Close" link on all of the AfD listings like the AfDHelper script. It took me awhile to figure out why it was doing what it was doing. I'd really like to finish the first script before attempting another one. I really do plan to finish the CloseXfD script. Honest! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

No, I understand fully. I just wondered who I could annoy with that and your name popped up in my mind. As I said, no harm done. Regards SoWhy 21:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Need Help

I want to create an entry for Dynamic Producer. It's am organization for newbie producers. They have somehow made an impact the career of Trey Songz, etc. Unfortunately, I do not know how I should go about it without it sounding ike a PR article. Please help. Talentshout (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

for this: [1] Willking1979 (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome...apparently some IP user/troll cut and pasted an article onto your user page. Thanks for all you do, Willking1979 (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Tagging of pornographic actresses as spam

Really your comment that the porn actresses wiki pages are not spam and valid wiki pages is so absurd I dont know where to begin. First off all of those pages were created by kink.com and are first referenced and linked off of their wiki kink.com showing a list of the so called females porn actors that have starred in their productions. First if someone creates a wiki about a person, as I have in the past, and that person per se is notable to their community, or to their career or have done things that appear to be notable a wiki editor will delete it in a matter of about 10 seconds after it is posted since that person has to be mentioned somewhere in the news or media like cnn etc.. Ok, so be it, then please explain how someone more than likely using a fake "screen name" that all they had to do was spread their legs and get gang banged in a cheap porn flick, and now that gives them notability to appear in and have their own wikipedia site? 'nuf said <sig>webman1000</sig>

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh Really?=

Let´s just walk through a simple scenerio shall we? John or Mary doe of 13 years of age are doing a school report on an idea that came from their discovery that by placing "kinks" in their garden hose they can make water shoot out much faster. They go to wikipedia since their parents allow that content as its "ok" an ecylocpedia. They enter the words "kink" and arrive at the kink.com wikipedia. Then as the page was before they are invited to a whole different subject than kinks in hoses and make a click on "ana cruzes" link and arrive at a explicit porn page with the title "Im the bitch that your mother warned you about...", well you know with nice pornographic pictures that show and tell all. His/her father happens to be a badass attorney and is quite offended when john/jane doe shows what they discovered in wikipedia. So under many laws, not withstanding, the "Communications deceny act" or the "contemporary community standards" laws or "corruption of a minor", a case is launched agaisnt wikipedia and its editors. Turns out since the editors have the ability to "speak for wikipedia" by approving or disapproving changes etc to content that they themselves not only represent wikipedia but also are not free from personal liability in this matter end up forking the bill for a 100 million plus lawsuit. It seems there is a strange US law that states that all "indecent" material as porno that is hosted on the web on US servers, has to have a simple warning on the home page that the person who is about to visit this site must be over 18 years of age.. etc.. Strange but I didnt see that in any of the 100 plus porn star wikipedias. So the 6 million dollars that wikipedia is trying to raise may not be enough to withstand the lawsuits that will come from the open and blatant access to porn to minors which the wiki "porno portal" path is embarking. All the cute and bold phrases that "wiki doesnt censors" and "they are notable" probable wont mean a whole lot when this "porno portal" of wikipedia ends up exposing wikipedia and its editors to all kinds of civil (oh and criminal) liability from the jane and john does that unfortunately end up on porn pages by doing simple research projects etc.. Dont forget that wikiporn, like any other porn will run agaisnt really ugly laws in the US and about 50 other countries world wide who really dont jive on minors having access to graphic porn. Good luck. Oh and gogo all of the porn actresses tagges originated from the kink.com wiki. [User:webman1000|webman1000]] (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)<sig>webman1000</sig>

I just wanted to note that I've received the same nastygram on my talk page. Even if this doesn't fall under the purview of direct legal threat, its certainly a breach of civility, and generally speaking, I'm pretty sick of this editor's behavior. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 07:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Article deleted

Hello,

Why did you deleted the article "Rika Zaraï" (6 september 2008). She is a israelian singer very knew in France, in Israel (of course) and in lot of states in the world. 28 millions of records.

Genefou, a french Wikipedian (12 december 2008)

Sorry for my poor english —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genefou (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page on fr.wikipedia.org. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Good A7, I have restored it though and added a few content, she is indeed notable (it's weird there was no article about her here). -- lucasbfr ^talk 13:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Teletubbies edits

Hey--Do you have any idea WTF that Boatshops person was trying to do? I looked at the diffs and it looked as though he just altered the spacing, but the character count said he added like 20,000 bytes of info. What did I miss? GJC 05:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

You're welcome. Just doing my duty as part of the CVU. Have a great weekend. :) Willking1979 (talk) 21:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Bethan Probert

Hi, this article has just been recreated for the third time, despite my warning the editor to stop doing this. Please help!-- Myosotis Scorpioides 01:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Cheers! See you blocked another recreator I stumbled across tonight too...-- Myosotis Scorpioides 01:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

_David^WS _(contribs) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy holidays! _David^WS _(contribs) 19:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Columbia4life vandalized Red Bud, Illinois page

Hi. This is my first attempt at leaving a comment for someone. I saw User:Columbia4life had vandalized the Columbia High School page and you had said he/she was at risk of having editing privileges revoked. I thought I would let you know this person also vandalized the Red Bud, Illinois page.

Thanks.

Stlmopoet (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I looked over the guidelines about posting external links and I'm not sure I understand why the link I added was removed? It was not commercial in nature, and it linked to a more detailed recipe for the topic.

In the examples given for reasons to include an external link it says: "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons."

In this case it was a recipe so it seems out of scope to post the entire recipe directly into the entry? I'm not trying to cause trouble, but I would like to better understand what the criteria for an external link is. ThanksBlutopia (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you for getting rid of the vandalism on the Erin Andrews article. Here's another barnstar for you:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I award the The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for his tremendous efforts to minimize vandalism on Wikipedia pages. BlueAg09 (Talk) 07:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy editing! BlueAg09 (Talk) 07:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, looks like people are wanting some attention :\ Shame on them for starting rumors like that. Anyhow, her page definitely gets a lot of attention, especially since she's a huge internet icon. Go to any college football fan message board and you will find many threads devoted to her. She's pretty attractive to a lot of people :D BlueAg09 (Talk) 18:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)