User talk:Lettashtohr

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/71|April+Further with Art+Feminism]]
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

August and New Achievements at Women in Red

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/87|Indigenous women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/88|Women of marginalized populations]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/89|Women writers]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/90|Geofocus: Bottom 10]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed!]] For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Apap (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julie Apap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julie Apap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Lettashtohr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lettashtohr! You created a thread called Reliable sources problem at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Julie Apap

Hello, Lettashtohr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julie Apap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Apap has been accepted

Julie Apap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red April Events

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you very much for your services as a member of the jury for Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Malta -- ToniSant (talk) 12:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adelaide Conroy (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adelaide Conroy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adelaide Conroy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

History

Please, stop trying to change the history [1][2]. It's very annoying. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

That's just extremely insensitive in current climate. Kyiv was not part of RUSSIA in 1917 but of Russian Empire and Soviet Union, and it's important to mention that Kyiv is MODERN DAT UKRAINE. Check those wiki pages for references about History that you claim to know.

Ukrainian heritage has been eradicated for decades and incorporated with a pan-russian culture. Not at the time of war, for Ukrainian people like myself it is important to separate the two into legitimate categories, where all culture produced is not attributed to the colonising state.

Check your sources. Lettashtohr (talk) 12:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Russian Empire (and in this case Russian Provisional Government) and Russia are synonymous. And if you acknowledge that it was part of the Russian Empire, why change it to Ukraine? It looks like deliberately introducing factual errors for the sake of WP:RIGHTINGGREATWRONGS and continuing this can lead to a block. Mellk (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Russian empire is not a synonym for modern day Russia. I don't know even where to begin to explain that highly colonial pan-russianism. It's like saying that Budapest (Hungary) is now Austria, in a 19th century article because it was part of Austrian Empire then. One must not allow coloniser to inherit the cultural heritage of the temporary colonised lands beyond the time of the existence of the coloniser's Empire.

The comment that - --in April 1917 Kiev was part of Russia--> is just not true, Russia did not exist then. In until March 1917 Kyiv was Russian Empire, in March it was part of Ukrainian People's Republic and governed by Tsentralna Rada until 1922.

So no, in those 3 years Kyiv was not Russia but was more Ukrainian than ever in its history until it fully became Ukraine in 1991.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Council_of_Ukraine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_People%27s_Republic

If we were to be exact and mention the actual origin of Deren, it will be closer to Ukraine or Ukrainian people's republic than to Russia, territory of the later did not include Kyiv when it was formed in 1991.

As for Gogol - in his time nationality like "Russian Empire" did not exist. If one considers his Ukrainian upbringing, origin where he was born and the anti Russian empirialist themes he covered in his works, his nationality = his ethnic origin (or Narodnost in Russian) which is Ukrainian and not Russian. Source - the article about Gogol. Lettashtohr (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Janusz Ostrogski—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 23:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wiśniowiecki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Mellk (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)