User talk:Oshwah: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has CheckUser privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted 1 edit by Q543frodomar (talk): WP:NPA. (TW)
Line 158: Line 158:


[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.135.85.198] Someone really needs a block... [[Special:Contributions/207.93.13.145|207.93.13.145]] ([[User talk:207.93.13.145|talk]]) 18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.135.85.198] Someone really needs a block... [[Special:Contributions/207.93.13.145|207.93.13.145]] ([[User talk:207.93.13.145|talk]]) 18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

== I AM BAMBIFAN101! ==

I ADMIT IT! I AM BAMBIFAN101 BUT PLEASE DON'T BLOCK ME! I JUST WANT TO EDIT LIKE EVERYONE ELSE! PLEASE!!!!

Revision as of 18:27, 5 December 2016



Let's chat


Click here to message me. I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page.

Please create your message with a subject/headline and sign your message using four tildes (~~~~) at the end.


Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.



User:Wiki-john836

Hi Oshwah,

Given this personal attack that this editor made on another user's talkpage, you may want to change their block duration to indef. Looking at their other edits, they are clearly WP:NOTHERE. 2601:1C0:103:976A:3464:725E:953E:6BFA (talk) 00:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weird, that's what I meant to do in the first place. Oh well... fixed :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING!!!!!!!!!

who is 39.43.44.18? he edited "Toyota" and it was deleted. L.S. inc. (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suspicious user reported: 73.206.252.27 L.S. inc. (talk) 01:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suspicious user reported: 72.221.79.111 L.S. inc. (talk) 02:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suspicious user reported: 50.186.85.75 L.S. inc. (talk) 02:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

user reported doing vandalism: 39.43.44.18 L.S. inc. (talk) 02:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suspicious user reported: 2602:306:32DA:4650:688D:A311:E808:8138 L.S. inc. (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@L.S. inc.: This is not the place for this. Please bring this to WP:AIV. 73.96.115.103 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CCS at K-bap

Hi, Oshwah. For the record, I felt that what was said at K-bap had such restrictive qualifications, and such mundane ones, tacked onto it that it could hardly be called a credible claim to be significant. It's the first Korean restaurant

  • in West Kalimantan
  • which is maintained and served directly by Korean people
  • who also brought original ingredients directly from Korea.

My reaction to these details was "So?". To me this is akin to being the first Asian restaurant in Fairfax County, Virginia, to put low-sodium soy sauce on the tables. It kind of undermines the meaning of the word "significant"; it's a weak advertising claim. That's my take, anyway. Largoplazo (talk) 12:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo - Hmm... your view is quite understandable, and I'm actually inclined to agree with you. Let's do this: Go ahead and re-tag the article for A7 as it was before. I'll let another administrator either agree and delete the page, or decline the tagging if they also feel that the article isn't eligible. Thanks for the message; I appreciate you for being open and expressing your thoughts about this article :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in no rush. :-) I put it up for AFD; maybe someone else will speedy it in the meantime. Thanks much for your reply! Largoplazo (talk) 12:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You got it :-). Let me know if I can do anything to help. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look who's back

And so it begins again their back Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 02:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of who I am, my purpose was to remove a source that is unequivocally banned from pro wrestling articles per WP:PW/RS. 188.95.52.251 (talk) 02:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WarMachineWildThing That was an LTA sock. Aaaaand he's gone! ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He returned!!

TheErectile has returned today in full force! Looks like their edits almost didn't get recognized by the other editor on the article - I saw it immediately as him though! :-D -- Dane2007 talk 16:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Tag Removal

Thank you for your concern in my article. I was instructed by another administrator to remove the speedy deletion tag manually myself. Unfortunately, the administrator was unable to remove the tag them self due to system issues. Therefore, they enlisted me help. I would never attempt to remove a speedy deletion tag without the permission of an administrator, all of which are far more experienced than myself. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roeroe03 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roeroe03 - Really? Where did this happen? Because the only person you talked to about this article was Ritchie333 here, who restored the article to a page on your user space here. According to this, he absolutely did not tell you that it was okay to re-create the article again, and then remove the speedy deletion tag after it was tagged. If you've talked to another administrator who told you to do this, please tell me who it was and provide me with the URL to where he/she said that... I'd be very interested to see this... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah - Keep in mind that she could've contacted an administrator another way, such as email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cannon212 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative Permission

I did not contact an administrator through a talk page. I spoke to a Wikipedia administrator over the phone and she walked me through the steps of restoring an article and removing a deletion tag. I can't remember her name, but I think it started with an S. If it would be of help to you, I can try and find the number I called. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roeroe03 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hacked Account

I'm incredibly sorry Oshwah. My account has been hacked repeatedly all day, as someone unfortunately found out my password. I already had an hacking issue sorted out with another administrator, but it appears my account has been accessed once again. To be clear, I did not personally edit a Phillipa Soo article, vandalize a feces article, or create/ restore "Lucaso the Voyager". I plan on creating a new account and hopefully avoid this problem again. Thank you, and I am once again terribly sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roeroe03 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lipstick And Luggage

Hello Oshwah, And I'm Lipstick and Luggage, first of all, I am new in Wikipedia and I would like something to do in the future at Wikipedia, to me I would love to be an Wiki Admin in a year while instead waiting, can I be a rollbacker first, Do rollbacker requires how many edits? Thank you. LAL (KB) (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lipstick and Luggage: First of all you should read the welcome page, and more precisely the policies and guidelines. I'm adding it to your talk page so you can have all the links in a single place.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jetstreamer, thank you for this one And I will review this. LAL (KB) (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please let us know if you have any more questions or need anything. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muscovy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscovy_%28disambiguation%29

Oshwah, you wrote me when you blocked me : During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. Shouldn't that apply FIRST to the ones who reverted mine first whithout any talk/consultation? I want to report Eriba-Marduk and Restoring Pages (and Autohistory which last 2 seem to at least pretend to be admin-members) , for inciting editwarring and replacing FACTS with fiction/propaganda with discussion and or sources/proof, shouldn't that outweigh the fact that I, admit blame and shame for that, violated 3R rule and perhaps if possible also seek protecting for the description as was there from 2008 - 2015 as which btw is FACT and can be proved as I did on my talkpage.

17:42, 30 November 2016 User account Restoring Pages was created appareant in collaborating with user Eriba-Marduk

BTW I won't revert it anymore. I get hopefully those 2 reported and or some form of protection for that page.


Ever tried that btw, seeking consesus with PAID kremlintrolls? I'm on (social) media all day English-Ukrianian-russian (I'm dutch myself) and try to weed out fake("news"/"facts") and put FACT news on my reddit. Ceesboogaart(talk) 16:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Actually, Ceesboogaart, the burden of proof is on the editor adding or restoring the content to provide a reliable source within a citation. The first two links lead to Wikipedia policies, and the last one leads to a Wikipedia how-to on creating correctly formatted references within Wikipedia. — Gestrid (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Oshwah, this paragraph was already on there from May 22 , 2008 till June 5, 2015! https://web.archive.org/web/20150515000000*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscovy_%28disambiguation%29 so I was not the starting editor in fact AT ALL, biggest part of that paragraph was on there https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muscovy_(disambiguation)&diff=587444509&oldid=569245996 I just linked to it earliest 1 year ago, and if that entry/paragraph was not proved (most are internal wikipedia-links) then wikipedia admins/contributors/members should look for other work or hobby, not doing what they supposed to do. Just check history of the page thats why I think it needs protecting comparing the 10 versions in webarchive.

And same burden of proof and citations apply then also to Eriba-Marduk and Restoring Pages for replacing/adding other entries instead which despite my enclopedic knowledge I can't find any evidence for, as I've show contrary evidence on my talk page! They provided no proof-citation whatsoever.. (made typo in my first msg saying with, came back to correct that) and adding that since i'm registred member never had a block before.

Further proof more, that from first msg from Eriba-Marduk, I tried to communicate on their talk page, they quickly blanked that. And as said 17:42, 30 November 2016 User account Restoring Pages was created appareant in collaborating with user Eriba-Marduk actions.

I hope I may assume there's no difference in treatment of members from RF and elsewhere??

Btw is the block now over? No, I won't revert that, will seek reporting those 2, and consultation /mediation on that muscovy subject, and perhaps protection if agreed on, btw mentioning muscovy/muscovites is enough to get banned on nearly any RF website.


Ceesboogaart (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Restoring_Pages&diff=next&oldid=752495146 seeing this, at least one of them is used to removing content without explanation Ceesboogaart (talk) 21:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP has been warned several time......

This IP has been warned several times by several users and they continue to Vandalize several articles. Can you please put a stop to this. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WarMachineWildThing: Brought it to WP:AIV as Oshwah is currently inactive for 20 hours. -- Dane2007 talk 04:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 07:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WarMachineWildThing - My apologies, I was busy that day and just now have had a chance to catch back up on messages and emails. The IP has been blocked. Please don't hesitate to bring any more to my attention. If I'm inactive (which I tend to be on the weekends and occasionally when things get busy with work), remember that you're always welcome to file a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism for assistance as well :-). Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you don't see it.....

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 12:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WarMachineWildThing - I'll be checking my email messages today. Stand by. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandal is back

Hi! That notorious IP vandal is back at Visa requirements for British citizens adding nonsense in Notes ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]). He is also frequenting other articles at random ([9]) The only problem is that it seems he is now using a dynamic IP range.--Twofortnights (talk) 12:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twofortnights - My apologies for the delay getting back to you. I was busy with real-life stuff :-). It appears that the article mentioned here has been protected. I'll poke around and check out the state of the other articles that the IP has messed with and make sure they don't need it as well. Thanks for the heads up! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey admin

[10] Someone really needs a block... 207.93.13.145 (talk) 18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I AM BAMBIFAN101!

I ADMIT IT! I AM BAMBIFAN101 BUT PLEASE DON'T BLOCK ME! I JUST WANT TO EDIT LIKE EVERYONE ELSE! PLEASE!!!!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oshwah&oldid=753187538"